Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM

We investigate the late Paleocene/early Eocene (PE) climate using the coupled atmosphere-ocean-sea ice model ECHAM5/MPI-OM. The surface in our PE control simulation is on average 297 K warm and ice-free, despite a moderate atmospheric CO2 concentration of 560 ppm. Compared to a pre-industrial refere...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate of the Past
Main Authors: Heinemann, M., Jungclaus, J. H., Marotzke, J.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-785-2009
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/785/2009/
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.sd4vsy
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.sd4vsy 2023-05-15T13:11:36+02:00 Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM Heinemann, M. Jungclaus, J. H. Marotzke, J. 2018-09-27 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-785-2009 https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/785/2009/ en eng doi:10.5194/cp-5-785-2009 10670/1.sd4vsy https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/785/2009/ undefined Geographica Helvetica - geography eISSN: 1814-9332 geo envir Text https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_18cf/ 2018 fttriple https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-785-2009 2023-01-22T17:11:38Z We investigate the late Paleocene/early Eocene (PE) climate using the coupled atmosphere-ocean-sea ice model ECHAM5/MPI-OM. The surface in our PE control simulation is on average 297 K warm and ice-free, despite a moderate atmospheric CO2 concentration of 560 ppm. Compared to a pre-industrial reference simulation (PR), low latitudes are 5 to 8 K warmer, while high latitudes are up to 40 K warmer. This high-latitude amplification is in line with proxy data, yet a comparison to sea surface temperature proxy data suggests that the Arctic surface temperatures are still too low in our PE simulation. To identify the mechanisms that cause the PE-PR surface temperature differences, we fit two simple energy balance models to the ECHAM5/MPI-OM results. We find that about 2/3 of the PE-PR global mean surface temperature difference are caused by a smaller clear sky emissivity due to higher atmospheric CO2 and water vapour concentrations in PE compared to PR; 1/3 is due to a smaller planetary albedo. The reduction of the pole-to-equator temperature gradient in PE compared to PR is due to (1) the large high-latitude effect of the higher CO2 and water vapour concentrations in PE compared to PR, (2) the lower Antarctic orography, (3) the smaller surface albedo at high latitudes, and (4) longwave cloud radiative effects. Our results support the hypothesis that local radiative effects rather than increased meridional heat transports were responsible for the "equable" PE climate. Text albedo Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Sea ice Unknown Antarctic Arctic Climate of the Past 5 4 785 802
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic geo
envir
spellingShingle geo
envir
Heinemann, M.
Jungclaus, J. H.
Marotzke, J.
Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM
topic_facet geo
envir
description We investigate the late Paleocene/early Eocene (PE) climate using the coupled atmosphere-ocean-sea ice model ECHAM5/MPI-OM. The surface in our PE control simulation is on average 297 K warm and ice-free, despite a moderate atmospheric CO2 concentration of 560 ppm. Compared to a pre-industrial reference simulation (PR), low latitudes are 5 to 8 K warmer, while high latitudes are up to 40 K warmer. This high-latitude amplification is in line with proxy data, yet a comparison to sea surface temperature proxy data suggests that the Arctic surface temperatures are still too low in our PE simulation. To identify the mechanisms that cause the PE-PR surface temperature differences, we fit two simple energy balance models to the ECHAM5/MPI-OM results. We find that about 2/3 of the PE-PR global mean surface temperature difference are caused by a smaller clear sky emissivity due to higher atmospheric CO2 and water vapour concentrations in PE compared to PR; 1/3 is due to a smaller planetary albedo. The reduction of the pole-to-equator temperature gradient in PE compared to PR is due to (1) the large high-latitude effect of the higher CO2 and water vapour concentrations in PE compared to PR, (2) the lower Antarctic orography, (3) the smaller surface albedo at high latitudes, and (4) longwave cloud radiative effects. Our results support the hypothesis that local radiative effects rather than increased meridional heat transports were responsible for the "equable" PE climate.
format Text
author Heinemann, M.
Jungclaus, J. H.
Marotzke, J.
author_facet Heinemann, M.
Jungclaus, J. H.
Marotzke, J.
author_sort Heinemann, M.
title Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM
title_short Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM
title_full Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM
title_fullStr Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM
title_full_unstemmed Warm Paleocene/Eocene climate as simulated in ECHAM5/MPI-OM
title_sort warm paleocene/eocene climate as simulated in echam5/mpi-om
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-785-2009
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/785/2009/
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
genre albedo
Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet albedo
Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Sea ice
op_source Geographica Helvetica - geography
eISSN: 1814-9332
op_relation doi:10.5194/cp-5-785-2009
10670/1.sd4vsy
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/785/2009/
op_rights undefined
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-785-2009
container_title Climate of the Past
container_volume 5
container_issue 4
container_start_page 785
op_container_end_page 802
_version_ 1766248136152449024