Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | French |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 |
| id |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.gvurzo |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openpolar |
| spelling |
fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.gvurzo 2023-05-15T16:46:49+02:00 Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases Eerola, Aleksi Reuchamps, Min 2016-01-01 http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 fr fre 10670/1.gvurzo http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 lic_cairn other Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques, Volume 77, 2, 2016-12-19, pp.319-336 scipo droit Journal Article https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_6501/ 2016 fttriple 2023-01-22T17:40:36Z This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Unknown |
| institution |
Open Polar |
| collection |
Unknown |
| op_collection_id |
fttriple |
| language |
French |
| topic |
scipo droit |
| spellingShingle |
scipo droit Eerola, Aleksi Reuchamps, Min Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases |
| topic_facet |
scipo droit |
| description |
This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy. |
| format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| author |
Eerola, Aleksi Reuchamps, Min |
| author_facet |
Eerola, Aleksi Reuchamps, Min |
| author_sort |
Eerola, Aleksi |
| title |
Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases |
| title_short |
Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases |
| title_full |
Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases |
| title_fullStr |
Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases |
| title_sort |
constitutional modernisation and deliberative democracy: a political science assessment of four cases |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 |
| genre |
Iceland |
| genre_facet |
Iceland |
| op_source |
Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques, Volume 77, 2, 2016-12-19, pp.319-336 |
| op_relation |
10670/1.gvurzo http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 |
| op_rights |
lic_cairn other |
| _version_ |
1766036914805145600 |