Summary: | `!-- Début du contenu @xml:lang="en" --bThe authors analyze how the powerful Republic of Novgorod was represented in Russian historical and political writing between the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. In the European tradition, a republic typically was military and modeled on the Roman Republic and its military strength. In contrast, the trading republic was considered a small state, militarily inferior to great monarchies. Russian social thought, starting with A.I. Mankiev`!-- Fin du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b `!-- Début du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b’`!-- Fin du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b `!-- Début du contenu @xml:lang="en" --bs, identified Novgorod with a military republic while remaining ambivalent in assessing its military might. The influence of Roman imagery and the general discourse on `!-- Fin du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b `!-- Début du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b“`!-- Fin du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b `!-- Début du contenu @xml:lang="en" --bglory and grandeur`!-- Fin du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b `!-- Début du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b”`!-- Fin du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b `!-- Début du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b of the late eighteenth century brought about the emergence of a model of old Novgorod as a military republic and set aside the trading republic as a conceptual toolkit for studying the town’s future historical development. Recognition of military power in the Republic of Novgorod undermined one of the key arguments in favor of monarchy – the claim that monarchy alone is able to effectively control and protect a vast territory. Thus, viewing Novgorod as a military republic was an important step towards the rise, in early‑nineteenth‑century Russian society, of a republican alternative to a seemingly immutable monarchy.`!-- Fin du contenu @xml:lang="en" --b Les auteurs analysent la représentation qui est faite de la toute puissante république de Novgorod dans les écrits historiques et politiques russes du xviii e – début du xix e siècle. Dans la tradition européenne, ...
|