When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals

We present four new records of the Matuyama–Brunhes (M–B) reversal from sediments of the Equatorial Indian Ocean, West Equatorial Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans with deposition rates between 2 cm/kyr and 4.5 cm/kyr. The magnetic measurements were performed using 8 cc cubic samples and provided we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Main Authors: Valet, Jean-pierre, Meynadier, Laure, Simon, Quentin, Thouveny, Nicolas
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Science Bv
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45561.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45562.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45564.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45565.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45567.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.a4l2by
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.a4l2by 2023-05-15T17:35:53+02:00 When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals Valet, Jean-pierre Meynadier, Laure Simon, Quentin Thouveny, Nicolas https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055 https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45561.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45562.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45564.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45565.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45567.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/ en eng Elsevier Science Bv doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055 10670/1.a4l2by https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45561.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45562.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45564.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45565.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45567.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/ lic_creative-commons other Archimer, archive institutionnelle de l'Ifremer Earth And Planetary Science Letters (0012-821X) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2016-11 , Vol. 453 , P. 96-107 envir geo Text https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_18cf/ fttriple https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055 2023-01-22T17:10:52Z We present four new records of the Matuyama–Brunhes (M–B) reversal from sediments of the Equatorial Indian Ocean, West Equatorial Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans with deposition rates between 2 cm/kyr and 4.5 cm/kyr. The magnetic measurements were performed using 8 cc cubic samples and provided well-defined reverse and normal polarity directions prior and after the last reversal. In three records stepwise demagnetization of the transitional samples revealed a succession of scattered directions instead of a well-defined characteristic component of magnetization. There is no relationship with changes in magnetic mineralogy, magnetic concentration and magnetic grain sizes. This behavior could be caused by weakly magnetized sediment. However the transitional samples of two cores have almost three orders of magnitude stronger magnetizations than the non-transitional samples that yielded unambiguous primary directions in the other two cores. Moreover a similar proportion of magnetic grains was aligned in all records. Therefore, the large amount of magnetic grains oriented by the weak transitional field did not contribute to improve the definition of the characteristic component. We infer that the weakness of the field might not be only responsible. Assuming that the transitional period is dominated by a multipolar field, it is likely that the rapidly moving non-dipole components generated different directions that were recorded over the 2 cm stratigraphic thickness of each sample. These components are carried by grains with similar magnetic properties yielding scattered directions during demagnetization. In contrast, the strongly magnetized sediments of the fourth core from the West Equatorial Pacific Ocean were exempt of problems during demagnetization. The declinations rotate smoothly between the two polarities while the inclinations remain close to zero. This scenario results from post-depositional realignment that integrated various amounts of pre- and post-transitional magnetic directions within each sample. ... Text North Atlantic Unknown Indian Pacific Earth and Planetary Science Letters 453 96 107
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language English
topic envir
geo
spellingShingle envir
geo
Valet, Jean-pierre
Meynadier, Laure
Simon, Quentin
Thouveny, Nicolas
When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals
topic_facet envir
geo
description We present four new records of the Matuyama–Brunhes (M–B) reversal from sediments of the Equatorial Indian Ocean, West Equatorial Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans with deposition rates between 2 cm/kyr and 4.5 cm/kyr. The magnetic measurements were performed using 8 cc cubic samples and provided well-defined reverse and normal polarity directions prior and after the last reversal. In three records stepwise demagnetization of the transitional samples revealed a succession of scattered directions instead of a well-defined characteristic component of magnetization. There is no relationship with changes in magnetic mineralogy, magnetic concentration and magnetic grain sizes. This behavior could be caused by weakly magnetized sediment. However the transitional samples of two cores have almost three orders of magnitude stronger magnetizations than the non-transitional samples that yielded unambiguous primary directions in the other two cores. Moreover a similar proportion of magnetic grains was aligned in all records. Therefore, the large amount of magnetic grains oriented by the weak transitional field did not contribute to improve the definition of the characteristic component. We infer that the weakness of the field might not be only responsible. Assuming that the transitional period is dominated by a multipolar field, it is likely that the rapidly moving non-dipole components generated different directions that were recorded over the 2 cm stratigraphic thickness of each sample. These components are carried by grains with similar magnetic properties yielding scattered directions during demagnetization. In contrast, the strongly magnetized sediments of the fourth core from the West Equatorial Pacific Ocean were exempt of problems during demagnetization. The declinations rotate smoothly between the two polarities while the inclinations remain close to zero. This scenario results from post-depositional realignment that integrated various amounts of pre- and post-transitional magnetic directions within each sample. ...
format Text
author Valet, Jean-pierre
Meynadier, Laure
Simon, Quentin
Thouveny, Nicolas
author_facet Valet, Jean-pierre
Meynadier, Laure
Simon, Quentin
Thouveny, Nicolas
author_sort Valet, Jean-pierre
title When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals
title_short When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals
title_full When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals
title_fullStr When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals
title_full_unstemmed When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals
title_sort when and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals
publisher Elsevier Science Bv
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45561.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45562.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45564.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45565.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45567.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/
geographic Indian
Pacific
geographic_facet Indian
Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Archimer, archive institutionnelle de l'Ifremer
Earth And Planetary Science Letters (0012-821X) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2016-11 , Vol. 453 , P. 96-107
op_relation doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055
10670/1.a4l2by
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45561.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45562.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45564.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45565.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/45567.pdf
https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00347/45868/
op_rights lic_creative-commons
other
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055
container_title Earth and Planetary Science Letters
container_volume 453
container_start_page 96
op_container_end_page 107
_version_ 1766135185481400320