Kant's Theory of Feeling

Two main contemporary interpretations of Kant’s account concerning the feeling of pleasure and displeasure argue that he explains feeling either causally or as an intentional mental state. According to the causal interpretation a feeling is an opaque sensation, which could not be explained by itself...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cvejić, Igor
Other Authors: Grubor, Nebojša, Babić, Jovan, Popović, Una
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:srp
Published: 2018
Subjects:
eco
Online Access:http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2910/Disertacija.pdf
http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=48753679
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.4qoob8
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10670/1.4qoob8 2023-05-15T18:13:04+02:00 Kant's Theory of Feeling Kantova teorija osećaja Cvejić, Igor Grubor, Nebojša Babić, Jovan Popović, Una 2018-01-01 http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2910/Disertacija.pdf http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=48753679 sr srp 10670/1.4qoob8 http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2910/Disertacija.pdf http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=48753679 other Repository of Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory of the University in Belgrade phil eco Other https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_1843/ 2018 fttriple 2023-01-22T17:11:46Z Two main contemporary interpretations of Kant’s account concerning the feeling of pleasure and displeasure argue that he explains feeling either causally or as an intentional mental state. According to the causal interpretation a feeling is an opaque sensation, which could not be explained by itself, but rather by its causes. As claimed by Rachel Zuckert, chosen due to her detailed explanation of intentional interpretation, feeling for Kant could be understood as a second order mental state, as a ‘consciousness of’ or ‘representations of’ another mental state and its relational characteristic. Relaying on Kant’s division of the faculties of the soul, the thesis will be defended, that both interpretations could not adequately explain Kant’s account of feeling. According to the difference between basic determinations of the soul, feelings, as mental states sui generis, are themselves not representations, therefore, they are nor sensations, nor second-order representations. Instead, a feeling should be understood as a subjective causality of representation, a tendency to maintain or restrain the state of representation – which is by itself manifested as a consciousness. Uobičajene su interpretacije po kojima Kant osećaje objašnjava ili kauzalno ili kao intencionalna stanja. Pod kauzalnim objašnjenjem, podrazumeva se da je osećaj prost oset (materijalna predstava čula) koja se ne može nikako drugačije objasniti osim preko svojih uzroka. Prema intencionalnom objašnjenju, kakvo je ono Rejčel Zakert, Kant osećaj shvata kao mentalno stanje drugog reda, kao svest o, ili predstavu o, nekom drugom stanju i njegovoj relacionoj karakteristici. Oslanjajući se na podelu osnovnih moći duše, u radu će se braniti teza da obe prethodne interpretacije ne mogu adekvatno da objasne Kantovo shvatanje osećaja. Prema razlici osnovnih odredbi duše osećaji, kao mentalna stanja sui generis, sami nisu predstave, prema tome ni oset, ni predstava višeg reda. Naprotiv, osećaj jeste subjektivni kauzalitet predstave, težnja da se u datom ... Other/Unknown Material sami Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language srp
topic phil
eco
spellingShingle phil
eco
Cvejić, Igor
Kant's Theory of Feeling
topic_facet phil
eco
description Two main contemporary interpretations of Kant’s account concerning the feeling of pleasure and displeasure argue that he explains feeling either causally or as an intentional mental state. According to the causal interpretation a feeling is an opaque sensation, which could not be explained by itself, but rather by its causes. As claimed by Rachel Zuckert, chosen due to her detailed explanation of intentional interpretation, feeling for Kant could be understood as a second order mental state, as a ‘consciousness of’ or ‘representations of’ another mental state and its relational characteristic. Relaying on Kant’s division of the faculties of the soul, the thesis will be defended, that both interpretations could not adequately explain Kant’s account of feeling. According to the difference between basic determinations of the soul, feelings, as mental states sui generis, are themselves not representations, therefore, they are nor sensations, nor second-order representations. Instead, a feeling should be understood as a subjective causality of representation, a tendency to maintain or restrain the state of representation – which is by itself manifested as a consciousness. Uobičajene su interpretacije po kojima Kant osećaje objašnjava ili kauzalno ili kao intencionalna stanja. Pod kauzalnim objašnjenjem, podrazumeva se da je osećaj prost oset (materijalna predstava čula) koja se ne može nikako drugačije objasniti osim preko svojih uzroka. Prema intencionalnom objašnjenju, kakvo je ono Rejčel Zakert, Kant osećaj shvata kao mentalno stanje drugog reda, kao svest o, ili predstavu o, nekom drugom stanju i njegovoj relacionoj karakteristici. Oslanjajući se na podelu osnovnih moći duše, u radu će se braniti teza da obe prethodne interpretacije ne mogu adekvatno da objasne Kantovo shvatanje osećaja. Prema razlici osnovnih odredbi duše osećaji, kao mentalna stanja sui generis, sami nisu predstave, prema tome ni oset, ni predstava višeg reda. Naprotiv, osećaj jeste subjektivni kauzalitet predstave, težnja da se u datom ...
author2 Grubor, Nebojša
Babić, Jovan
Popović, Una
format Other/Unknown Material
author Cvejić, Igor
author_facet Cvejić, Igor
author_sort Cvejić, Igor
title Kant's Theory of Feeling
title_short Kant's Theory of Feeling
title_full Kant's Theory of Feeling
title_fullStr Kant's Theory of Feeling
title_full_unstemmed Kant's Theory of Feeling
title_sort kant's theory of feeling
publishDate 2018
url http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2910/Disertacija.pdf
http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=48753679
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_source Repository of Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory of the University in Belgrade
op_relation 10670/1.4qoob8
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2910/Disertacija.pdf
http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=48753679
op_rights other
_version_ 1766185555575439360