À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC

Water shortages remind us that polar ices constitute the biggest source of drinking water in the world. Under the form of icebergs, they represent more drinking water than the annual production of all rivers of the world combined. Hence, icebergs have an important potential for drinking water produc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revue québécoise de droit international
Main Author: Quilleré-Majzoub, Fabienne
Format: Text
Language:French
Published: Société québécoise de droit international 2007
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7202/1068961ar
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1068961ar
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10.7202/1068961ar
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10.7202/1068961ar 2023-05-15T13:43:55+02:00 À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS? Discussion Autour DU STATUT OF ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC Quilleré-Majzoub, Fabienne 2007-01-01 https://doi.org/10.7202/1068961ar http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1068961ar fr fre Société québécoise de droit international Érudit doi:10.7202/1068961ar http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1068961ar other Revue québécoise de droit international / Quebec Journal of International Law / Revista quebequense de derecho internacional geo droit Text https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_18cf/ 2007 fttriple https://doi.org/10.7202/1068961ar 2023-01-22T17:36:19Z Water shortages remind us that polar ices constitute the biggest source of drinking water in the world. Under the form of icebergs, they represent more drinking water than the annual production of all rivers of the world combined. Hence, icebergs have an important potential for drinking water production. In the absence of a specific status, their conditions of exploitation fall under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay Convention). They are thus available for anybody's exploitation while in the high sea, as long as it is in respect of the sovereign rights of coastal States; either their territorial sea or their exclusive economic zone. Conversely to the Arctic, which is also submitted to the Montego Bay Convention, exploitation of any sort is forbidden in the Antarctic, as prescribed by the Antarctic Treaty System. The assimilation of icebergs to the waters in which they float, bring about the lack of continuity in which they are taken into account by international law. The currents propositions related to the unification of their status are not satisfying and international law as it is does not propose any transposable solution. Therefore, it is necessary to define which pathways can lead to a solution that will generate sufficient consensus to be the subject of a future status. Les pénuries d’eau nous rappellent que les glaces polaires constituent le plus grand réservoir d’eau douce de la planète. Sous forme d’icebergs, elles représentent plus d’eau douce que la production annuelle cumulée de toutes les rivières du globe. Les icebergs présentent donc des potentialités énormes de production d’eau douce. À défaut d’un statut spécifique, les conditions de leur exploitation sont établies par la Convention de Montego Bay sur le droit de la mer. Ils font ainsi l’objet d’une liberté d’exploitation au profit de tous dans la haute mer, et dans le respect des droits souverains des États côtiers, soit dans la mer territoriale ou dans la zone économique exclusive. Contrairement à l’Arctique également ... Text Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Iceberg* Iceberg* Law of the Sea Unknown Antarctic Arctic The Antarctic Revue québécoise de droit international 20 1 199 225
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language French
topic geo
droit
spellingShingle geo
droit
Quilleré-Majzoub, Fabienne
À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
topic_facet geo
droit
description Water shortages remind us that polar ices constitute the biggest source of drinking water in the world. Under the form of icebergs, they represent more drinking water than the annual production of all rivers of the world combined. Hence, icebergs have an important potential for drinking water production. In the absence of a specific status, their conditions of exploitation fall under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Montego Bay Convention). They are thus available for anybody's exploitation while in the high sea, as long as it is in respect of the sovereign rights of coastal States; either their territorial sea or their exclusive economic zone. Conversely to the Arctic, which is also submitted to the Montego Bay Convention, exploitation of any sort is forbidden in the Antarctic, as prescribed by the Antarctic Treaty System. The assimilation of icebergs to the waters in which they float, bring about the lack of continuity in which they are taken into account by international law. The currents propositions related to the unification of their status are not satisfying and international law as it is does not propose any transposable solution. Therefore, it is necessary to define which pathways can lead to a solution that will generate sufficient consensus to be the subject of a future status. Les pénuries d’eau nous rappellent que les glaces polaires constituent le plus grand réservoir d’eau douce de la planète. Sous forme d’icebergs, elles représentent plus d’eau douce que la production annuelle cumulée de toutes les rivières du globe. Les icebergs présentent donc des potentialités énormes de production d’eau douce. À défaut d’un statut spécifique, les conditions de leur exploitation sont établies par la Convention de Montego Bay sur le droit de la mer. Ils font ainsi l’objet d’une liberté d’exploitation au profit de tous dans la haute mer, et dans le respect des droits souverains des États côtiers, soit dans la mer territoriale ou dans la zone économique exclusive. Contrairement à l’Arctique également ...
format Text
author Quilleré-Majzoub, Fabienne
author_facet Quilleré-Majzoub, Fabienne
author_sort Quilleré-Majzoub, Fabienne
title À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
title_short À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
title_full À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
title_fullStr À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
title_full_unstemmed À QUI APPARTIENNENT LES ICEBERGS ? DISCUSSION AUTOUR DU STATUT DES ICEBERGS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
title_sort à qui appartiennent les icebergs ? discussion autour du statut des icebergs en droit international public
publisher Société québécoise de droit international
publishDate 2007
url https://doi.org/10.7202/1068961ar
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1068961ar
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Iceberg*
Iceberg*
Law of the Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Iceberg*
Iceberg*
Law of the Sea
op_source Revue québécoise de droit international / Quebec Journal of International Law / Revista quebequense de derecho internacional
op_relation doi:10.7202/1068961ar
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1068961ar
op_rights other
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7202/1068961ar
container_title Revue québécoise de droit international
container_volume 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 199
op_container_end_page 225
_version_ 1766194985067085824