Traduire la religiosité amérindienne

This paper attempts to translate the religious worldview of Northern Canadian First Nation peoples through the relativization of concepts from more recent religions such as Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. These dualist religions are first contrasted with the monistic religious conception...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Théologiques
Main Author: Legros, Dominique
Format: Text
Language:French
Published: Faculté de théologie et de sciences des religions, Université de Montréal 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7202/017776ar
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/017776ar
id fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10.7202/017776ar
record_format openpolar
spelling fttriple:oai:gotriple.eu:10.7202/017776ar 2023-05-15T18:41:19+02:00 Traduire la religiosité amérindienne Translating the Amerindian cereosity Legros, Dominique 2007-01-01 https://doi.org/10.7202/017776ar http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/017776ar fr fre Faculté de théologie et de sciences des religions, Université de Montréal Érudit doi:10.7202/017776ar http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/017776ar Théologiques hisphilso relig Text https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/resource_types/c_18cf/ 2007 fttriple https://doi.org/10.7202/017776ar 2023-01-22T16:36:54Z This paper attempts to translate the religious worldview of Northern Canadian First Nation peoples through the relativization of concepts from more recent religions such as Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. These dualist religions are first contrasted with the monistic religious conceptions of the universe found in Ancient Greece and Rome. This initial analysis leads one to recognize that religion may very well proclaim the non-existence of Paradise outside this world. By further comparing the Ancient Greek and Roman monistic religions with those of the Australian Aborigines, this paper argues that a monistic conception of the world may in turn be conceived without the existence of God, gods, goddesses and even half-gods as among the Greeks or the Romans. At this juncture, the paper opens on an analysis of the religious episteme of the Tutchone Athapaskan peoples of the Yukon Territory — a religious episteme which admits the existence of no gods, no goddesses, and a fortiori no God. A discussion is then put forward on Tutchone notions of shadow-souls, breaths, yindi’ (intellect) and the relations of those realities with that of zhäak (powers and healing songs) of animals and other natural phenomena before concluding with a final relativization of religious deistic worldviews.a Cet article rend compte de l’épistémè religieux des peuples amérindiens du Nord du Canada en relativisant les concepts les plus fondamentaux de religions plus récentes, telles que le judaïsme, le bouddhisme, le christianisme et l’islam. Cette relativisation est effectuée en contrastant leur conception dualiste du monde avec celle des religions monistes grecque et romaine anciennes. Ce premier examen permet de constater qu’une religion peut parfaitement prôner la non-existence d’un paradis en dehors de l’ici-bas. En comparant ensuite les religions anciennes de la Grèce et de Rome et celles des aborigènes australiens, l’article révèle qu’une conception moniste du monde peut à son tour se concevoir sans l’existence de Dieu, ni ... Text Tutchone Yukon Unknown Canada Yukon Théologiques 15 2 133 161
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id fttriple
language French
topic hisphilso
relig
spellingShingle hisphilso
relig
Legros, Dominique
Traduire la religiosité amérindienne
topic_facet hisphilso
relig
description This paper attempts to translate the religious worldview of Northern Canadian First Nation peoples through the relativization of concepts from more recent religions such as Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. These dualist religions are first contrasted with the monistic religious conceptions of the universe found in Ancient Greece and Rome. This initial analysis leads one to recognize that religion may very well proclaim the non-existence of Paradise outside this world. By further comparing the Ancient Greek and Roman monistic religions with those of the Australian Aborigines, this paper argues that a monistic conception of the world may in turn be conceived without the existence of God, gods, goddesses and even half-gods as among the Greeks or the Romans. At this juncture, the paper opens on an analysis of the religious episteme of the Tutchone Athapaskan peoples of the Yukon Territory — a religious episteme which admits the existence of no gods, no goddesses, and a fortiori no God. A discussion is then put forward on Tutchone notions of shadow-souls, breaths, yindi’ (intellect) and the relations of those realities with that of zhäak (powers and healing songs) of animals and other natural phenomena before concluding with a final relativization of religious deistic worldviews.a Cet article rend compte de l’épistémè religieux des peuples amérindiens du Nord du Canada en relativisant les concepts les plus fondamentaux de religions plus récentes, telles que le judaïsme, le bouddhisme, le christianisme et l’islam. Cette relativisation est effectuée en contrastant leur conception dualiste du monde avec celle des religions monistes grecque et romaine anciennes. Ce premier examen permet de constater qu’une religion peut parfaitement prôner la non-existence d’un paradis en dehors de l’ici-bas. En comparant ensuite les religions anciennes de la Grèce et de Rome et celles des aborigènes australiens, l’article révèle qu’une conception moniste du monde peut à son tour se concevoir sans l’existence de Dieu, ni ...
format Text
author Legros, Dominique
author_facet Legros, Dominique
author_sort Legros, Dominique
title Traduire la religiosité amérindienne
title_short Traduire la religiosité amérindienne
title_full Traduire la religiosité amérindienne
title_fullStr Traduire la religiosité amérindienne
title_full_unstemmed Traduire la religiosité amérindienne
title_sort traduire la religiosité amérindienne
publisher Faculté de théologie et de sciences des religions, Université de Montréal
publishDate 2007
url https://doi.org/10.7202/017776ar
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/017776ar
geographic Canada
Yukon
geographic_facet Canada
Yukon
genre Tutchone
Yukon
genre_facet Tutchone
Yukon
op_source Théologiques
op_relation doi:10.7202/017776ar
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/017776ar
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7202/017776ar
container_title Théologiques
container_volume 15
container_issue 2
container_start_page 133
op_container_end_page 161
_version_ 1766230822415761408