Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract ?In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMerieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Language:English
Published: Springer-Verlag 2011
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60077
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
id fttrinitycoll:oai:tara.tcd.ie:2262/60077
record_format openpolar
spelling fttrinitycoll:oai:tara.tcd.ie:2262/60077 2023-05-15T16:01:14+02:00 Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus 2011-10-13T00:53:55Z http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60077 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 en eng Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 0934-9723 (pISSN) 1435-4373 (eISSN) 0934-9723 (ISSN) 10096 (JournalID) s10096-010-1080-2 (publisherID) 1080 (ArticleID) http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60077 European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 30 2 259 264 doi:10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 The Author(s), 2010 Open Access 12 months Life Sciences 2011 fttrinitycoll https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 2020-02-16T13:53:02Z Abstract ?In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMerieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (?strain study?). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (?daily practice study?). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays. gunnar.andriesse@gmail.com (Andriesse, G. I.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Andriesse, G. I.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Elberts, S.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Vrolijk, A.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Verhulst, C.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.) Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center (VUmc) - Amsterdam - NETHERLANDS (Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.) NETHERLANDS Registration: 2010-09-22 Received: 2010-05-27 Accepted: 2010-09-22 ePublished: 2010-10-13 Other/Unknown Material DML The University of Dublin, Trinity College: TARA (Trinity's Access to Research Archive) Pasteur ENVELOPE(140.099,140.099,-66.625,-66.625) European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 30 2 259 264
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Dublin, Trinity College: TARA (Trinity's Access to Research Archive)
op_collection_id fttrinitycoll
language English
topic Life Sciences
spellingShingle Life Sciences
Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
topic_facet Life Sciences
description Abstract ?In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMerieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (?strain study?). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (?daily practice study?). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays. gunnar.andriesse@gmail.com (Andriesse, G. I.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Andriesse, G. I.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Elberts, S.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Vrolijk, A.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Verhulst, C.) Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital - Breda - NETHERLANDS (Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.) Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center (VUmc) - Amsterdam - NETHERLANDS (Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.) NETHERLANDS Registration: 2010-09-22 Received: 2010-05-27 Accepted: 2010-09-22 ePublished: 2010-10-13
title Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_short Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_full Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of staphylococcus aureus
publisher Springer-Verlag
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60077
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
long_lat ENVELOPE(140.099,140.099,-66.625,-66.625)
geographic Pasteur
geographic_facet Pasteur
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation 0934-9723 (pISSN)
1435-4373 (eISSN)
0934-9723 (ISSN)
10096 (JournalID)
s10096-010-1080-2 (publisherID)
1080 (ArticleID)
http://hdl.handle.net/2262/60077
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
30
2
259
264
doi:10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
op_rights The Author(s), 2010
Open Access
12 months
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
container_title European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
container_volume 30
container_issue 2
container_start_page 259
op_container_end_page 264
_version_ 1766397185653473280