Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements

This paper argues that participatory governance initiatives like co-management can be made effective through agency rulemaking. Using the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board as a case study, this paper affirms that it is possible for marginalized stakeholders to participate in co-mana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sari Graben
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.32920/22223365.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Assessing_Stakeholder_Participation_in_Sub-Arctic_Co-Management_Administrative_Rulemaking_and_Private_Agreements/22223365
id fttorometrofigs:oai:figshare.com:article/22223365
record_format openpolar
spelling fttorometrofigs:oai:figshare.com:article/22223365 2023-11-12T04:13:44+01:00 Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements Sari Graben 2023-03-06T20:07:15Z https://doi.org/10.32920/22223365.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Assessing_Stakeholder_Participation_in_Sub-Arctic_Co-Management_Administrative_Rulemaking_and_Private_Agreements/22223365 unknown doi:10.32920/22223365.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Assessing_Stakeholder_Participation_in_Sub-Arctic_Co-Management_Administrative_Rulemaking_and_Private_Agreements/22223365 CC BY 4.0 Environmental and natural resources law co-management Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board decision-making Text Journal contribution 2023 fttorometrofigs https://doi.org/10.32920/22223365.v1 2023-10-15T05:43:34Z This paper argues that participatory governance initiatives like co-management can be made effective through agency rulemaking. Using the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board as a case study, this paper affirms that it is possible for marginalized stakeholders to participate in co-management and alter decision-making. By using its formal authority to generate rules that reflect community perspectives, this board contextualized environmental assessment in community-based perspectives. The study of participation presented here illustrates: 1) that a high level of agency support for community participation in rule-making can lead to rules which reflect community perspectives; and 2) that agency implementation of community perspectives has led to the increased use of stakeholder collaboration through private agreement. Nonetheless, the paper also addresses limitations on the ability to translate social needs into privately negotiated agreements where negotiations depart from highly commoditized terms. Consequently, this paper questions the use of negotiated agreements to meet the goals of stakeholder participation, as conceived by deliberative democratic strands of new governance. Dans cet article, l’auteure soutient que le pouvoir de règlementation d’un organisme peut rendre plus efficace de nouvelles initiatives en matière de gouvernance telles que la cogestion. Prenant l’Office d’examen des répercussions environnementales de la vallée du Mackenzie comme exemple, elle affirme que des parties prenantes marginalisées ont la possibilité de participer à de nouvelles modalités de gouvernance comme la cogestion et d’influer sur la prise de décision. En exerçant son pouvoir d’adopter des règles inspirées des valeurs communautaires, l’Office a procédé à une évaluation environnementale en tenant compte du contexte communautaire. L’étude de participation présentée ici démontre: 1) que, lorsqu’un organisme appuie fortement la participation de la collectivité à l’élaboration des règles, les règles adoptées ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Mackenzie Valley Research from Toronto Metropolitan University Arctic Mackenzie Valley ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666)
institution Open Polar
collection Research from Toronto Metropolitan University
op_collection_id fttorometrofigs
language unknown
topic Environmental and natural resources law
co-management
Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board
decision-making
spellingShingle Environmental and natural resources law
co-management
Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board
decision-making
Sari Graben
Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
topic_facet Environmental and natural resources law
co-management
Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board
decision-making
description This paper argues that participatory governance initiatives like co-management can be made effective through agency rulemaking. Using the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board as a case study, this paper affirms that it is possible for marginalized stakeholders to participate in co-management and alter decision-making. By using its formal authority to generate rules that reflect community perspectives, this board contextualized environmental assessment in community-based perspectives. The study of participation presented here illustrates: 1) that a high level of agency support for community participation in rule-making can lead to rules which reflect community perspectives; and 2) that agency implementation of community perspectives has led to the increased use of stakeholder collaboration through private agreement. Nonetheless, the paper also addresses limitations on the ability to translate social needs into privately negotiated agreements where negotiations depart from highly commoditized terms. Consequently, this paper questions the use of negotiated agreements to meet the goals of stakeholder participation, as conceived by deliberative democratic strands of new governance. Dans cet article, l’auteure soutient que le pouvoir de règlementation d’un organisme peut rendre plus efficace de nouvelles initiatives en matière de gouvernance telles que la cogestion. Prenant l’Office d’examen des répercussions environnementales de la vallée du Mackenzie comme exemple, elle affirme que des parties prenantes marginalisées ont la possibilité de participer à de nouvelles modalités de gouvernance comme la cogestion et d’influer sur la prise de décision. En exerçant son pouvoir d’adopter des règles inspirées des valeurs communautaires, l’Office a procédé à une évaluation environnementale en tenant compte du contexte communautaire. L’étude de participation présentée ici démontre: 1) que, lorsqu’un organisme appuie fortement la participation de la collectivité à l’élaboration des règles, les règles adoptées ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sari Graben
author_facet Sari Graben
author_sort Sari Graben
title Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_short Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_full Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_fullStr Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements
title_sort assessing stakeholder participation in sub-arctic co-management: administrative rulemaking and private agreements
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.32920/22223365.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Assessing_Stakeholder_Participation_in_Sub-Arctic_Co-Management_Administrative_Rulemaking_and_Private_Agreements/22223365
long_lat ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666)
geographic Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
geographic_facet Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
genre Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
genre_facet Arctic
Mackenzie Valley
op_relation doi:10.32920/22223365.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Assessing_Stakeholder_Participation_in_Sub-Arctic_Co-Management_Administrative_Rulemaking_and_Private_Agreements/22223365
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.32920/22223365.v1
_version_ 1782331601930158080