The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:

In determining the fracture toughness of a test specimen, standards currently require either locally-measured load-line displacements or clip gage displacements. In order to measure these parameters, secondary sensors generally need to be installed and calibrated, which often comes at a higher cost....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walters, C.L., Voormeeren, L.O., Janssen, M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3
id fttno:oai:tudelft.nl:uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3
record_format openpolar
spelling fttno:oai:tudelft.nl:uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3 2023-05-15T14:24:39+02:00 The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters: Walters, C.L. Voormeeren, L.O. Janssen, M. 2013-01-01 http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3 en eng uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3 475384 http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3 Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE 2013, June 9-14, 2013 Nantes, France. OMAE2013-10378, 1-11 Marine High Tech Maritime and Offshore Systems Industrial Innovation Building Engineering & Civil Engineering SD - Structural Dynamics TS - Technical Sciences article 2013 fttno 2022-04-10T16:06:11Z In determining the fracture toughness of a test specimen, standards currently require either locally-measured load-line displacements or clip gage displacements. In order to measure these parameters, secondary sensors generally need to be installed and calibrated, which often comes at a higher cost. As crosshead displacements are automatically measured in most modern material test machines, use of the crosshead measurements alone would be less expensive. Although much criticism exists on the accuracy of this approach in determining CTOD values, the method can still prove sufficiently accurate for many applications. The current paper aims to assess the magnitude of the errors that arise from using the crosshead displacement in fracture mechanics testing of steels with the Single Edge Notched Bending (SENB) specimen geometry. The results show that for steels with sufficiently large toughness, the use of the crosshead displacement to calculate J and convert to CTOD produces results within 10% of calculating the CTOD directly with conventional techniques. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic TU Delft: Institutional Repository (Delft University of Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection TU Delft: Institutional Repository (Delft University of Technology)
op_collection_id fttno
language English
topic Marine
High Tech Maritime and Offshore Systems
Industrial Innovation
Building Engineering & Civil Engineering
SD - Structural Dynamics
TS - Technical Sciences
spellingShingle Marine
High Tech Maritime and Offshore Systems
Industrial Innovation
Building Engineering & Civil Engineering
SD - Structural Dynamics
TS - Technical Sciences
Walters, C.L.
Voormeeren, L.O.
Janssen, M.
The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:
topic_facet Marine
High Tech Maritime and Offshore Systems
Industrial Innovation
Building Engineering & Civil Engineering
SD - Structural Dynamics
TS - Technical Sciences
description In determining the fracture toughness of a test specimen, standards currently require either locally-measured load-line displacements or clip gage displacements. In order to measure these parameters, secondary sensors generally need to be installed and calibrated, which often comes at a higher cost. As crosshead displacements are automatically measured in most modern material test machines, use of the crosshead measurements alone would be less expensive. Although much criticism exists on the accuracy of this approach in determining CTOD values, the method can still prove sufficiently accurate for many applications. The current paper aims to assess the magnitude of the errors that arise from using the crosshead displacement in fracture mechanics testing of steels with the Single Edge Notched Bending (SENB) specimen geometry. The results show that for steels with sufficiently large toughness, the use of the crosshead displacement to calculate J and convert to CTOD produces results within 10% of calculating the CTOD directly with conventional techniques.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Walters, C.L.
Voormeeren, L.O.
Janssen, M.
author_facet Walters, C.L.
Voormeeren, L.O.
Janssen, M.
author_sort Walters, C.L.
title The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:
title_short The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:
title_full The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:
title_fullStr The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:
title_full_unstemmed The use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:
title_sort use of crosshead displacement in determining fracture parameters:
publishDate 2013
url http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE 2013, June 9-14, 2013 Nantes, France. OMAE2013-10378, 1-11
op_relation uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3
475384
http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6cc90400-edf9-4280-aa8a-3fdc18480bf3
_version_ 1766297077797617664