Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods

22 pgs. One random and two nonrandom but potentially more cost effective station selection methods were used to collect bag seine samples in seven Texas bay systems during October 1980-March 1981. Three-way analyses of variance were used to compare mean catch rates of five juvenile fishes among stat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Osburn, H.R.
Format: Book
Language:unknown
Published: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries Branch 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/19960
id fttexasamunigalv:oai:tamug-ir.tdl.org:1969.3/19960
record_format openpolar
spelling fttexasamunigalv:oai:tamug-ir.tdl.org:1969.3/19960 2023-11-12T04:25:13+01:00 Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods Osburn, H.R. 1988 http://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/19960 unknown Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries Branch 219.00 http://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/19960 seine nets catch/effort marine fish Micropogon undulatus Atlantic croaker Paralichthys lethostigma southern flounder striped mullet Mugil cephalus red drum Cynoscion nebulosus spotted seatrout Sciaenops ocellata Book 1988 fttexasamunigalv 2023-10-30T16:14:44Z 22 pgs. One random and two nonrandom but potentially more cost effective station selection methods were used to collect bag seine samples in seven Texas bay systems during October 1980-March 1981. Three-way analyses of variance were used to compare mean catch rates of five juvenile fishes among station selection methods, month and bay systems. Station selection method significantly affected the catch rates of Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus), southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma) and striped mullet (Mugil cephalus) but not those of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) and spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus). Significant differences were found among months and among bay systems for all species tested. Highly variable catch rates caused by changes in gear efficiency and patchy distribution of captured organisms may have obscured the ability to detect meaningful differences among the selection methods. Successful monitoring of juvenile fish should include year-round random sampling in each bay system. Utilization of nonrandom station selection methods, if economially necessary, should be done with caution and the data segregated from those collected randomly. http://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htm Book Red drum Sciaenops ocellatus Texas A&M University Galveston Campus: DSpace Repository
institution Open Polar
collection Texas A&M University Galveston Campus: DSpace Repository
op_collection_id fttexasamunigalv
language unknown
topic seine nets
catch/effort
marine fish
Micropogon undulatus
Atlantic croaker
Paralichthys lethostigma
southern flounder
striped mullet
Mugil cephalus
red drum
Cynoscion nebulosus
spotted seatrout
Sciaenops ocellata
spellingShingle seine nets
catch/effort
marine fish
Micropogon undulatus
Atlantic croaker
Paralichthys lethostigma
southern flounder
striped mullet
Mugil cephalus
red drum
Cynoscion nebulosus
spotted seatrout
Sciaenops ocellata
Osburn, H.R.
Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods
topic_facet seine nets
catch/effort
marine fish
Micropogon undulatus
Atlantic croaker
Paralichthys lethostigma
southern flounder
striped mullet
Mugil cephalus
red drum
Cynoscion nebulosus
spotted seatrout
Sciaenops ocellata
description 22 pgs. One random and two nonrandom but potentially more cost effective station selection methods were used to collect bag seine samples in seven Texas bay systems during October 1980-March 1981. Three-way analyses of variance were used to compare mean catch rates of five juvenile fishes among station selection methods, month and bay systems. Station selection method significantly affected the catch rates of Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus), southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma) and striped mullet (Mugil cephalus) but not those of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) and spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus). Significant differences were found among months and among bay systems for all species tested. Highly variable catch rates caused by changes in gear efficiency and patchy distribution of captured organisms may have obscured the ability to detect meaningful differences among the selection methods. Successful monitoring of juvenile fish should include year-round random sampling in each bay system. Utilization of nonrandom station selection methods, if economially necessary, should be done with caution and the data segregated from those collected randomly. http://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htm
format Book
author Osburn, H.R.
author_facet Osburn, H.R.
author_sort Osburn, H.R.
title Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods
title_short Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods
title_full Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods
title_fullStr Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods
title_sort comparison of random and nonrandom bag seine station selection methods
publisher Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries Branch
publishDate 1988
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/19960
genre Red drum
Sciaenops ocellatus
genre_facet Red drum
Sciaenops ocellatus
op_relation 219.00
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/19960
_version_ 1782339551045353472