Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture)

This article considers what happened to American anthropology, which was initiated by the scientist Franz Boas, who commanded all fields of anthropology, physical, biological, and cultural. Boas was a brave field worker who explored Eskimo land, and inspired two famous students, Ruth Benedict and Ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Portis-Winner, Irene
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06
https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06
id fttartuunivojs:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15698
record_format openpolar
spelling fttartuunivojs:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15698 2024-06-23T07:52:31+00:00 Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture) Portis-Winner, Irene 2009-12-15 application/pdf https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06 https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06 eng eng University of Tartu Press https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06/10660 https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06 doi:10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06 Copyright (c) 2019 Sign Systems Studies Sign Systems Studies; Vol. 37 No. 1/2 (2009); 114-168 1736-7409 1406-4243 10.12697/37.1-2 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2009 fttartuunivojs https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.0610.12697/37.1-2 2024-06-04T03:10:17Z This article considers what happened to American anthropology, which was initiated by the scientist Franz Boas, who commanded all fields of anthropology, physical, biological, and cultural. Boas was a brave field worker who explored Eskimo land, and inspired two famous students, Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead, to cross borders in new kinds of studies. After this florescence, there was a general return to linear descriptive positivism, superficial comparisons of quantitative cultural traits, and false evolutionary schemes, which did not introduce us to the personalities and inner worlds of the tribal peoples studied. The 1953 study by the philosopher David Bidney was a revelation. Bidney enunciated and clarified all my doubts about the paths of anthropology and his work became to some extent a model for a narration of the story of American anthropology. In many ways he envisaged a semiotics of culture formulated by Lotman. I try to illustrate the fallacies listed by Bidney and how they have been partially overcome in some later anthropological studies which have focused on symbolism, artistry, and subjective qualities of the people studied. I then try to give an overview of the school started by Lotman that spans all human behavior, that demonstrates the complexity of meaning and communication, in vast areas of knowledge, from art, literature, science, and philosophy, that abjured strict relativism and closed systems and has become an inspiration for those who want anthropology to encompass the self and the other, and Bahtin’s double meaning. This paper was inspired by Bidney as a call to explore widely all possible worlds, not to abandon science and reality but to explore deeper inner interrelations and how the aesthetic may be indeed be paramount in the complexities of communication. Article in Journal/Newspaper eskimo* University of Tartu: ojs.utlib.ee Benedict ENVELOPE(-66.585,-66.585,-66.157,-66.157)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tartu: ojs.utlib.ee
op_collection_id fttartuunivojs
language English
description This article considers what happened to American anthropology, which was initiated by the scientist Franz Boas, who commanded all fields of anthropology, physical, biological, and cultural. Boas was a brave field worker who explored Eskimo land, and inspired two famous students, Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead, to cross borders in new kinds of studies. After this florescence, there was a general return to linear descriptive positivism, superficial comparisons of quantitative cultural traits, and false evolutionary schemes, which did not introduce us to the personalities and inner worlds of the tribal peoples studied. The 1953 study by the philosopher David Bidney was a revelation. Bidney enunciated and clarified all my doubts about the paths of anthropology and his work became to some extent a model for a narration of the story of American anthropology. In many ways he envisaged a semiotics of culture formulated by Lotman. I try to illustrate the fallacies listed by Bidney and how they have been partially overcome in some later anthropological studies which have focused on symbolism, artistry, and subjective qualities of the people studied. I then try to give an overview of the school started by Lotman that spans all human behavior, that demonstrates the complexity of meaning and communication, in vast areas of knowledge, from art, literature, science, and philosophy, that abjured strict relativism and closed systems and has become an inspiration for those who want anthropology to encompass the self and the other, and Bahtin’s double meaning. This paper was inspired by Bidney as a call to explore widely all possible worlds, not to abandon science and reality but to explore deeper inner interrelations and how the aesthetic may be indeed be paramount in the complexities of communication.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Portis-Winner, Irene
spellingShingle Portis-Winner, Irene
Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture)
author_facet Portis-Winner, Irene
author_sort Portis-Winner, Irene
title Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture)
title_short Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture)
title_full Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture)
title_fullStr Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture)
title_full_unstemmed Facing emergences: Past traces and new directions in American anthropology (Why American anthropology needs semiotics of culture)
title_sort facing emergences: past traces and new directions in american anthropology (why american anthropology needs semiotics of culture)
publisher University of Tartu Press
publishDate 2009
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06
https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06
long_lat ENVELOPE(-66.585,-66.585,-66.157,-66.157)
geographic Benedict
geographic_facet Benedict
genre eskimo*
genre_facet eskimo*
op_source Sign Systems Studies; Vol. 37 No. 1/2 (2009); 114-168
1736-7409
1406-4243
10.12697/37.1-2
op_relation https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06/10660
https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06
doi:10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.06
op_rights Copyright (c) 2019 Sign Systems Studies
op_doi https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.0610.12697/37.1-2
_version_ 1802643837148987392