Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview

This paper is an intragenetic typological study of participial systems in Uralic languages, a family demonstrating a significant degree of variation in this domain. The classification of participial forms is based primarily on two parameters, participial orientation, or relativizing capacity, and te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics
Main Author: Shagal, Ksenia
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2018.9.1.03
https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.03
_version_ 1831201976886493184
author Shagal, Ksenia
author_facet Shagal, Ksenia
author_sort Shagal, Ksenia
collection University of Tartu: ojs.utlib.ee
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics
container_volume 9
description This paper is an intragenetic typological study of participial systems in Uralic languages, a family demonstrating a significant degree of variation in this domain. The classification of participial forms is based primarily on two parameters, participial orientation, or relativizing capacity, and tense-aspect-modality (TAM). The sample comprises ten languages, and the data comes from descriptive studies as well as from native speakers and language experts. The study shows that participial systems in Uralic languages fall into three major groups, namely languages with inherently oriented participles, languages with contextually oriented participles, and languages featuring a combination of these participial types. The geographical distribution of participial systems shows strong areal tendencies resulting from language contact. For several centuries, western Uralic languages (e.g. Finnish and Hungarian) have been influenced by Slavic, Germanic and Baltic varieties, while eastern Uralic languages (e.g. Tundra Nenets and Khanty) historically form a linguistic area with northern Eurasian languages, such as Turkic and Yeniseian. As a result, the western varieties belong to the Standard Average European type with respect to participial properties, while the eastern ones make use of prenominal participial relative clauses, which are a well-known areal feature in North Asia. It is also noteworthy that Uralic languages do not show any clear matter borrowing in participial forms, so it is rather the pattern that is transmitted via contact.Аннотация. Ксения Шагал: Системы причастий в уральских языках: предварительный обзор. Данная статья представляет собой внутригенетическое типологическое исследование систем причастий в уральской языковой семье, которая отличается заметным разнообразием в этой области. Предлагаемая классификация причастных форм основана на двух основных параметрах: ориентации причастий и их видо-временных характеристиках. Изучаемая выборка включает в себя десять языков. Данные были получены в ходе работы ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre khanty
nenets
Tundra
genre_facet khanty
nenets
Tundra
id fttartuunivojs:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15207
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id fttartuunivojs
op_container_end_page 84
op_doi https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.03
op_relation https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2018.9.1.03/10177
https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2018.9.1.03
doi:10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.03
op_source Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018): Erinumber / Special issue: "Typology of Uralic languages: current views and new perspectives"; 55-84
2228-1339
1736-8987
publishDate 2018
publisher University of Tartu
record_format openpolar
spelling fttartuunivojs:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15207 2025-05-04T14:29:34+00:00 Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview Shagal, Ksenia 2018-12-31 application/pdf https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2018.9.1.03 https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.03 eng eng University of Tartu https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2018.9.1.03/10177 https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2018.9.1.03 doi:10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.03 Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018): Erinumber / Special issue: "Typology of Uralic languages: current views and new perspectives"; 55-84 2228-1339 1736-8987 Uralic languages participles relative clauses language contact areal linguistics info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2018 fttartuunivojs https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.03 2025-04-10T03:15:35Z This paper is an intragenetic typological study of participial systems in Uralic languages, a family demonstrating a significant degree of variation in this domain. The classification of participial forms is based primarily on two parameters, participial orientation, or relativizing capacity, and tense-aspect-modality (TAM). The sample comprises ten languages, and the data comes from descriptive studies as well as from native speakers and language experts. The study shows that participial systems in Uralic languages fall into three major groups, namely languages with inherently oriented participles, languages with contextually oriented participles, and languages featuring a combination of these participial types. The geographical distribution of participial systems shows strong areal tendencies resulting from language contact. For several centuries, western Uralic languages (e.g. Finnish and Hungarian) have been influenced by Slavic, Germanic and Baltic varieties, while eastern Uralic languages (e.g. Tundra Nenets and Khanty) historically form a linguistic area with northern Eurasian languages, such as Turkic and Yeniseian. As a result, the western varieties belong to the Standard Average European type with respect to participial properties, while the eastern ones make use of prenominal participial relative clauses, which are a well-known areal feature in North Asia. It is also noteworthy that Uralic languages do not show any clear matter borrowing in participial forms, so it is rather the pattern that is transmitted via contact.Аннотация. Ксения Шагал: Системы причастий в уральских языках: предварительный обзор. Данная статья представляет собой внутригенетическое типологическое исследование систем причастий в уральской языковой семье, которая отличается заметным разнообразием в этой области. Предлагаемая классификация причастных форм основана на двух основных параметрах: ориентации причастий и их видо-временных характеристиках. Изучаемая выборка включает в себя десять языков. Данные были получены в ходе работы ... Article in Journal/Newspaper khanty nenets Tundra University of Tartu: ojs.utlib.ee Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 9 1 55 84
spellingShingle Uralic languages
participles
relative clauses
language contact
areal linguistics
Shagal, Ksenia
Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview
title Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview
title_full Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview
title_fullStr Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview
title_full_unstemmed Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview
title_short Participial systems in Uralic languages: an overview
title_sort participial systems in uralic languages: an overview
topic Uralic languages
participles
relative clauses
language contact
areal linguistics
topic_facet Uralic languages
participles
relative clauses
language contact
areal linguistics
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2018.9.1.03
https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.03