Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests

Developed nations, especially Nordic countries such as Iceland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland allocate a sizeable portion of their budget for social welfare. On the contrary, developing counties' allocation for social welfare has been negligible. The question is: can state intervention th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Developing Areas
Main Authors: Khan, Habibullah, Bashar, Omar K. M. R.
Other Authors: Swinburne University of Technology
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Journal of Developing Areas 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/412085
https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0137
id ftswinburne:tle:f197dec5-3e92-4373-9bad-1a3727d58c22:28f49f06-0da8-44be-9edc-ad1dd0a9c582:1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftswinburne:tle:f197dec5-3e92-4373-9bad-1a3727d58c22:28f49f06-0da8-44be-9edc-ad1dd0a9c582:1 2023-05-15T16:52:15+02:00 Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests Khan, Habibullah Bashar, Omar K. M. R. Swinburne University of Technology 2015 http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/412085 https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0137 unknown Journal of Developing Areas http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/412085 https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0137 Copyright © 2015. The Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 49, no. 4 (Fall 2015), pp. 285-300 Journal article 2015 ftswinburne https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0137 2019-09-07T22:48:32Z Developed nations, especially Nordic countries such as Iceland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland allocate a sizeable portion of their budget for social welfare. On the contrary, developing counties' allocation for social welfare has been negligible. The question is: can state intervention through social welfare provisions ensure sustained economic growth? In other words, do social expenditures promote economic growth? This study seeks to answer this question by establishing links between social expenditures and economic growth in Australia and New Zealand, and draw lessons for fast developing ASEAN economies as they aspire to be developed nations soon. Using annual data from 1980 to 2012, we deploy cointegration and error correction methods for establishing long-run relationship between social expenditures and economic growth. We conduct Granger causality tests for testing short-term direction of causality among the variables. For Australia, economic growth is found to have three main determinants- education, health and social expenditures. For New Zealand, health and social expenditures have been found as the main determinants of growth. However, no long-run relationship could be established among the variables when we included budget deficit in our model. The Granger causality tests indicate that one way causality running from economic growth to health expenditure, and social expenditure to economic growth in Australia. In case of New Zealand, on the other hand, one-way causality runs from education expenditure to economic growth, health expenditure to education expenditure, economic growth to health expenditure, and education expenditure to budget deficit. Social welfare expenditures also Granger cause economic growth. Our findings suggest that social expenditures promoted growth in Australia and New Zealand. The fast developing economies such as Singapore and Malaysia, which aim to achieve the developed country status by 2020 and usually do not allocate sizeable portion of their budget for social welfare, should adopt more 'generous' social policies for the sake of a balanced development. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Swinburne University of Technology: Swinburne Research Bank New Zealand Norway The Journal of Developing Areas 49 4 285 300
institution Open Polar
collection Swinburne University of Technology: Swinburne Research Bank
op_collection_id ftswinburne
language unknown
description Developed nations, especially Nordic countries such as Iceland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland allocate a sizeable portion of their budget for social welfare. On the contrary, developing counties' allocation for social welfare has been negligible. The question is: can state intervention through social welfare provisions ensure sustained economic growth? In other words, do social expenditures promote economic growth? This study seeks to answer this question by establishing links between social expenditures and economic growth in Australia and New Zealand, and draw lessons for fast developing ASEAN economies as they aspire to be developed nations soon. Using annual data from 1980 to 2012, we deploy cointegration and error correction methods for establishing long-run relationship between social expenditures and economic growth. We conduct Granger causality tests for testing short-term direction of causality among the variables. For Australia, economic growth is found to have three main determinants- education, health and social expenditures. For New Zealand, health and social expenditures have been found as the main determinants of growth. However, no long-run relationship could be established among the variables when we included budget deficit in our model. The Granger causality tests indicate that one way causality running from economic growth to health expenditure, and social expenditure to economic growth in Australia. In case of New Zealand, on the other hand, one-way causality runs from education expenditure to economic growth, health expenditure to education expenditure, economic growth to health expenditure, and education expenditure to budget deficit. Social welfare expenditures also Granger cause economic growth. Our findings suggest that social expenditures promoted growth in Australia and New Zealand. The fast developing economies such as Singapore and Malaysia, which aim to achieve the developed country status by 2020 and usually do not allocate sizeable portion of their budget for social welfare, should adopt more 'generous' social policies for the sake of a balanced development.
author2 Swinburne University of Technology
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Khan, Habibullah
Bashar, Omar K. M. R.
spellingShingle Khan, Habibullah
Bashar, Omar K. M. R.
Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests
author_facet Khan, Habibullah
Bashar, Omar K. M. R.
author_sort Khan, Habibullah
title Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests
title_short Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests
title_full Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests
title_fullStr Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests
title_full_unstemmed Social expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand using cointegration and causality tests
title_sort social expenditure and economic growth: evidence from australia and new zealand using cointegration and causality tests
publisher Journal of Developing Areas
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/412085
https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0137
geographic New Zealand
Norway
geographic_facet New Zealand
Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source The Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 49, no. 4 (Fall 2015), pp. 285-300
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/412085
https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0137
op_rights Copyright © 2015.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0137
container_title The Journal of Developing Areas
container_volume 49
container_issue 4
container_start_page 285
op_container_end_page 300
_version_ 1766042411813830656