Marin diplomati i Arktis

The Arctic area is in a state of rapid change. New fairways open up as the ice melts, which – in turn – presents both opportunities and threats to the neighboring states. As the Arctic is of both economical and strategic interest, these states include both great powers like the U.S. and Russia but a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lüning, Carl
Format: Bachelor Thesis
Language:Swedish
Published: Försvarshögskolan 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699
id ftswedishndc:oai:DiVA.org:fhs-6699
record_format openpolar
spelling ftswedishndc:oai:DiVA.org:fhs-6699 2023-05-15T14:53:38+02:00 Marin diplomati i Arktis Lüning, Carl 2016 application/pdf http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699 swe swe Försvarshögskolan http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Marin Diplomati Marin Strategi Säkerhetspolitik Arktis Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap Student thesis info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis text 2016 ftswedishndc 2022-11-18T06:50:24Z The Arctic area is in a state of rapid change. New fairways open up as the ice melts, which – in turn – presents both opportunities and threats to the neighboring states. As the Arctic is of both economical and strategic interest, these states include both great powers like the U.S. and Russia but also small powers like Norway and Denmark. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate how these states use their armed forces in claim of the Arctic and – more specifically – how Maritime Diplomacy is used in this situation. The thesis furthers attempts to address the question whether there are differences between the large states on the one hand, and the smaller ones on the other when using Maritime Diplomacy. The theoretical framework used in the thesis comes from several well known scholars and military theorists including Cable and Corbett which focus on maritime strategy. The analyses suggest that there are indeed significant differences between the studied states in terms of their use of Maritime Diplomacy. The thesis concludes that the four nations uses it’s maritime diplomacy tools in a coherent way. But there is a difference between great powers and smaller states since the smaller tend to use influence as a tool in greater extent. The thesis also shows that Russia as the only state that uses a coercive tool. Bachelor Thesis Arctic Arktis Arktis* Swedish National Defence College: Publications (DiVA) Arctic Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Swedish National Defence College: Publications (DiVA)
op_collection_id ftswedishndc
language Swedish
topic Marin Diplomati
Marin Strategi
Säkerhetspolitik
Arktis
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
spellingShingle Marin Diplomati
Marin Strategi
Säkerhetspolitik
Arktis
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
Lüning, Carl
Marin diplomati i Arktis
topic_facet Marin Diplomati
Marin Strategi
Säkerhetspolitik
Arktis
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
description The Arctic area is in a state of rapid change. New fairways open up as the ice melts, which – in turn – presents both opportunities and threats to the neighboring states. As the Arctic is of both economical and strategic interest, these states include both great powers like the U.S. and Russia but also small powers like Norway and Denmark. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate how these states use their armed forces in claim of the Arctic and – more specifically – how Maritime Diplomacy is used in this situation. The thesis furthers attempts to address the question whether there are differences between the large states on the one hand, and the smaller ones on the other when using Maritime Diplomacy. The theoretical framework used in the thesis comes from several well known scholars and military theorists including Cable and Corbett which focus on maritime strategy. The analyses suggest that there are indeed significant differences between the studied states in terms of their use of Maritime Diplomacy. The thesis concludes that the four nations uses it’s maritime diplomacy tools in a coherent way. But there is a difference between great powers and smaller states since the smaller tend to use influence as a tool in greater extent. The thesis also shows that Russia as the only state that uses a coercive tool.
format Bachelor Thesis
author Lüning, Carl
author_facet Lüning, Carl
author_sort Lüning, Carl
title Marin diplomati i Arktis
title_short Marin diplomati i Arktis
title_full Marin diplomati i Arktis
title_fullStr Marin diplomati i Arktis
title_full_unstemmed Marin diplomati i Arktis
title_sort marin diplomati i arktis
publisher Försvarshögskolan
publishDate 2016
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699
geographic Arctic
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
genre Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
genre_facet Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
op_relation http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
_version_ 1766325238437511168