Marin diplomati i Arktis
The Arctic area is in a state of rapid change. New fairways open up as the ice melts, which – in turn – presents both opportunities and threats to the neighboring states. As the Arctic is of both economical and strategic interest, these states include both great powers like the U.S. and Russia but a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Bachelor Thesis |
Language: | Swedish |
Published: |
Försvarshögskolan
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699 |
id |
ftswedishndc:oai:DiVA.org:fhs-6699 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftswedishndc:oai:DiVA.org:fhs-6699 2023-05-15T14:53:38+02:00 Marin diplomati i Arktis Lüning, Carl 2016 application/pdf http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699 swe swe Försvarshögskolan http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Marin Diplomati Marin Strategi Säkerhetspolitik Arktis Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap Student thesis info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis text 2016 ftswedishndc 2022-11-18T06:50:24Z The Arctic area is in a state of rapid change. New fairways open up as the ice melts, which – in turn – presents both opportunities and threats to the neighboring states. As the Arctic is of both economical and strategic interest, these states include both great powers like the U.S. and Russia but also small powers like Norway and Denmark. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate how these states use their armed forces in claim of the Arctic and – more specifically – how Maritime Diplomacy is used in this situation. The thesis furthers attempts to address the question whether there are differences between the large states on the one hand, and the smaller ones on the other when using Maritime Diplomacy. The theoretical framework used in the thesis comes from several well known scholars and military theorists including Cable and Corbett which focus on maritime strategy. The analyses suggest that there are indeed significant differences between the studied states in terms of their use of Maritime Diplomacy. The thesis concludes that the four nations uses it’s maritime diplomacy tools in a coherent way. But there is a difference between great powers and smaller states since the smaller tend to use influence as a tool in greater extent. The thesis also shows that Russia as the only state that uses a coercive tool. Bachelor Thesis Arctic Arktis Arktis* Swedish National Defence College: Publications (DiVA) Arctic Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Swedish National Defence College: Publications (DiVA) |
op_collection_id |
ftswedishndc |
language |
Swedish |
topic |
Marin Diplomati Marin Strategi Säkerhetspolitik Arktis Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap |
spellingShingle |
Marin Diplomati Marin Strategi Säkerhetspolitik Arktis Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap Lüning, Carl Marin diplomati i Arktis |
topic_facet |
Marin Diplomati Marin Strategi Säkerhetspolitik Arktis Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap |
description |
The Arctic area is in a state of rapid change. New fairways open up as the ice melts, which – in turn – presents both opportunities and threats to the neighboring states. As the Arctic is of both economical and strategic interest, these states include both great powers like the U.S. and Russia but also small powers like Norway and Denmark. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate how these states use their armed forces in claim of the Arctic and – more specifically – how Maritime Diplomacy is used in this situation. The thesis furthers attempts to address the question whether there are differences between the large states on the one hand, and the smaller ones on the other when using Maritime Diplomacy. The theoretical framework used in the thesis comes from several well known scholars and military theorists including Cable and Corbett which focus on maritime strategy. The analyses suggest that there are indeed significant differences between the studied states in terms of their use of Maritime Diplomacy. The thesis concludes that the four nations uses it’s maritime diplomacy tools in a coherent way. But there is a difference between great powers and smaller states since the smaller tend to use influence as a tool in greater extent. The thesis also shows that Russia as the only state that uses a coercive tool. |
format |
Bachelor Thesis |
author |
Lüning, Carl |
author_facet |
Lüning, Carl |
author_sort |
Lüning, Carl |
title |
Marin diplomati i Arktis |
title_short |
Marin diplomati i Arktis |
title_full |
Marin diplomati i Arktis |
title_fullStr |
Marin diplomati i Arktis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Marin diplomati i Arktis |
title_sort |
marin diplomati i arktis |
publisher |
Försvarshögskolan |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699 |
geographic |
Arctic Norway |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Norway |
genre |
Arctic Arktis Arktis* |
genre_facet |
Arctic Arktis Arktis* |
op_relation |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-6699 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
_version_ |
1766325238437511168 |