Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?

When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant-lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Main Authors: Zuo, Jiawei, Webb, A. Alexander G., Chin, Emily J., Ackerman, Lukáš, Harvey, Jason, Haproff, Peter J., Müller, Thomas, Wang, Qin, Hickman, Arthur H., Sorger, Dominik, Ramírez‐Salazar, Anthony
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117283
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519
id ftsubgoettingen:oai:publications.goettingen-research-online.de:2/117283
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsubgoettingen:oai:publications.goettingen-research-online.de:2/117283 2023-12-24T10:17:13+01:00 Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates? Zuo, Jiawei Webb, A. Alexander G. Chin, Emily J. Ackerman, Lukáš Harvey, Jason Haproff, Peter J. Müller, Thomas Wang, Qin Hickman, Arthur H. Sorger, Dominik Ramírez‐Salazar, Anthony Zuo, Jiawei Webb, A. Alexander G. Chin, Emily J. Ackerman, Lukáš Harvey, Jason Haproff, Peter J. Müller, Thomas Wang, Qin Hickman, Arthur H. Sorger, Dominik Ramírez‐Salazar, Anthony 2022 https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117283 https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519 en eng https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117283 doi:10.1029/2022GC010519 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/article journal_article yes published_version 2022 ftsubgoettingen https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519 2023-11-26T23:11:58Z When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant-lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland), some phaneritic ultramafic rocks have been dominantly interpreted as subduction-related, tectonically-exhumed mantle slices or cumulates. Here, we compared Eoarchean phaneritic ultramafic rocks from the Isua supracrustal belt with mantle peridotites, cumulates, and phaneritic ultramafic samples from the Paleoarchean East Pilbara Terrane (Australia), which is widely interpreted to have formed in non-plate tectonic settings. Our findings show that Pilbara samples have cumulate and polygonal textures, melt-enriched trace element patterns, relative enrichment of Os, Ir, and Ru versus Pt and Pd, and chromite-spinel with variable TiO2 and Mg#, and relatively consistent Cr#. Both, new and existing data show that cumulates and mantle rocks potentially have similar whole-rock geochemical characteristics, deformation fabrics, and alteration features. Geochemical modeling results indicate that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks have interacted with low-Pt and Pd melts generated by sequestration of Pd and Pt into sulphide and/or alloy during magmatism. Such melts cannot have interacted with a mantle wedge. Correspondingly, geochemical compositions and rock textures suggest that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks are not tectonically-exhumed mantle peridotites, but are cumulates that experienced metasomatism by fluids and co-genetic melts. Because such rocks could have formed in either plate or non-plate tectonic settings, they cannot be used to differentiate early Earth tectonic settings. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland GRO.publications (Göttingen Research Online Publications - Göttingen University) Greenland Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 23 12
institution Open Polar
collection GRO.publications (Göttingen Research Online Publications - Göttingen University)
op_collection_id ftsubgoettingen
language English
description When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant-lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland), some phaneritic ultramafic rocks have been dominantly interpreted as subduction-related, tectonically-exhumed mantle slices or cumulates. Here, we compared Eoarchean phaneritic ultramafic rocks from the Isua supracrustal belt with mantle peridotites, cumulates, and phaneritic ultramafic samples from the Paleoarchean East Pilbara Terrane (Australia), which is widely interpreted to have formed in non-plate tectonic settings. Our findings show that Pilbara samples have cumulate and polygonal textures, melt-enriched trace element patterns, relative enrichment of Os, Ir, and Ru versus Pt and Pd, and chromite-spinel with variable TiO2 and Mg#, and relatively consistent Cr#. Both, new and existing data show that cumulates and mantle rocks potentially have similar whole-rock geochemical characteristics, deformation fabrics, and alteration features. Geochemical modeling results indicate that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks have interacted with low-Pt and Pd melts generated by sequestration of Pd and Pt into sulphide and/or alloy during magmatism. Such melts cannot have interacted with a mantle wedge. Correspondingly, geochemical compositions and rock textures suggest that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks are not tectonically-exhumed mantle peridotites, but are cumulates that experienced metasomatism by fluids and co-genetic melts. Because such rocks could have formed in either plate or non-plate tectonic settings, they cannot be used to differentiate early Earth tectonic settings.
author2 Zuo, Jiawei
Webb, A. Alexander G.
Chin, Emily J.
Ackerman, Lukáš
Harvey, Jason
Haproff, Peter J.
Müller, Thomas
Wang, Qin
Hickman, Arthur H.
Sorger, Dominik
Ramírez‐Salazar, Anthony
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Zuo, Jiawei
Webb, A. Alexander G.
Chin, Emily J.
Ackerman, Lukáš
Harvey, Jason
Haproff, Peter J.
Müller, Thomas
Wang, Qin
Hickman, Arthur H.
Sorger, Dominik
Ramírez‐Salazar, Anthony
spellingShingle Zuo, Jiawei
Webb, A. Alexander G.
Chin, Emily J.
Ackerman, Lukáš
Harvey, Jason
Haproff, Peter J.
Müller, Thomas
Wang, Qin
Hickman, Arthur H.
Sorger, Dominik
Ramírez‐Salazar, Anthony
Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
author_facet Zuo, Jiawei
Webb, A. Alexander G.
Chin, Emily J.
Ackerman, Lukáš
Harvey, Jason
Haproff, Peter J.
Müller, Thomas
Wang, Qin
Hickman, Arthur H.
Sorger, Dominik
Ramírez‐Salazar, Anthony
author_sort Zuo, Jiawei
title Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_short Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_full Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_fullStr Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_full_unstemmed Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_sort earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
publishDate 2022
url https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117283
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117283
doi:10.1029/2022GC010519
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519
container_title Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
container_volume 23
container_issue 12
_version_ 1786205201682661376