North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System

Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology are now at the forefront of geologic timekeeping. While this technique heavily relies on the accuracy of astronomical calculations, solar system chaos limits how far back astronomical calculations can be performed with confidence. High‐resolution paleoclimate re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
Main Authors: De Vleeschouwer, David, Penman, Donald E., D'haenens, Simon, Wu, Fei, Westerhold, Thomas, Vahlenkamp, Maximilian, Cappelli, Carlotta, Agnini, Claudia, Kordesch, Wendy E. C., King, Daniel J., van der Ploeg, Robin, Pälike, Heiko, Turner, Sandra Kirtland, Wilson, Paul, Norris, Richard D., Zachos, James C., Bohaty, Steven M., Hull, Pincelli M., 3 Department of Geosciences Utah State University Logan UT USA, 4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Yale University New Haven CT USA, 7 School of Earth Sciences State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources China University of Geosciences Wuhan China, 2 MARUM ‐ Center for Marine Environmental Sciences University of Bremen Bremen Germany, 8 Dipartimento di Geoscienze Università di Padova Padova Italy, 9 Greater Farallones Association San Francisco CA USA, 10 School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand, 11 Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands, 13 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of California – Riverside Riverside CA USA, 14 Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton National Oceanography Centre Southampton UK, 15 Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA, 16 Department of Earth & Planetary Science University of California Santa Cruz CA USA
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004555
http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/11187
id ftsubggeo:oai:e-docs.geo-leo.de:11858/11187
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection GEO-LEOe-docs (FID GEO)
op_collection_id ftsubggeo
language English
topic ddc:551
North Atlantic
Eocene
cyclostratigraphy
astrochronology
spellingShingle ddc:551
North Atlantic
Eocene
cyclostratigraphy
astrochronology
De Vleeschouwer, David
Penman, Donald E.
D'haenens, Simon
Wu, Fei
Westerhold, Thomas
Vahlenkamp, Maximilian
Cappelli, Carlotta
Agnini, Claudia
Kordesch, Wendy E. C.
King, Daniel J.
van der Ploeg, Robin
Pälike, Heiko
Turner, Sandra Kirtland
Wilson, Paul
Norris, Richard D.
Zachos, James C.
Bohaty, Steven M.
Hull, Pincelli M.
3 Department of Geosciences Utah State University Logan UT USA
4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Yale University New Haven CT USA
7 School of Earth Sciences State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources China University of Geosciences Wuhan China
2 MARUM ‐ Center for Marine Environmental Sciences University of Bremen Bremen Germany
8 Dipartimento di Geoscienze Università di Padova Padova Italy
9 Greater Farallones Association San Francisco CA USA
10 School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand
11 Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
13 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of California – Riverside Riverside CA USA
14 Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton National Oceanography Centre Southampton UK
15 Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
16 Department of Earth & Planetary Science University of California Santa Cruz CA USA
North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System
topic_facet ddc:551
North Atlantic
Eocene
cyclostratigraphy
astrochronology
description Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology are now at the forefront of geologic timekeeping. While this technique heavily relies on the accuracy of astronomical calculations, solar system chaos limits how far back astronomical calculations can be performed with confidence. High‐resolution paleoclimate records with Milankovitch imprints now allow reversing the traditional cyclostratigraphic approach: Middle Eocene drift sediments from Newfoundland Ridge are well‐suited for this purpose, due to high sedimentation rates and distinct lithological cycles. Per contra, the stratigraphies of Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Sites U1408–U1410 are highly complex with several hiatuses. Here, we built a two‐site composite and constructed a conservative age‐depth model to provide a reliable chronology for this rhythmic, highly resolved (<1 kyr) sedimentary archive. Astronomical components (g‐terms and precession constant) are extracted from proxy time‐series using two different techniques, producing consistent results. We find astronomical frequencies up to 4% lower than reported in astronomical solution La04. This solution, however, was smoothed over 20‐Myr intervals, and our results therefore provide constraints on g‐term variability on shorter, million‐year timescales. We also report first evidence that the g 4 –g 3 “grand eccentricity cycle” may have had a 1.2‐Myr period around 41 Ma, contrary to its 2.4‐Myr periodicity today. Our median precession constant estimate (51.28 ± 0.56″/year) confirms earlier indicators of a relatively low rate of tidal dissipation in the Paleogene. Newfoundland Ridge drift sediments thus enable a reliable reconstruction of astronomical components at the limit of validity of current astronomical calculations, extracted from geologic data, providing a new target for the next generation of astronomical calculations. Plain Language Summary: The traditional cyclostratigraphic approach is to align and correlate a geologic depth‐series with an astronomical solution. However, the chaotic nature of ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author De Vleeschouwer, David
Penman, Donald E.
D'haenens, Simon
Wu, Fei
Westerhold, Thomas
Vahlenkamp, Maximilian
Cappelli, Carlotta
Agnini, Claudia
Kordesch, Wendy E. C.
King, Daniel J.
van der Ploeg, Robin
Pälike, Heiko
Turner, Sandra Kirtland
Wilson, Paul
Norris, Richard D.
Zachos, James C.
Bohaty, Steven M.
Hull, Pincelli M.
3 Department of Geosciences Utah State University Logan UT USA
4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Yale University New Haven CT USA
7 School of Earth Sciences State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources China University of Geosciences Wuhan China
2 MARUM ‐ Center for Marine Environmental Sciences University of Bremen Bremen Germany
8 Dipartimento di Geoscienze Università di Padova Padova Italy
9 Greater Farallones Association San Francisco CA USA
10 School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand
11 Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
13 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of California – Riverside Riverside CA USA
14 Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton National Oceanography Centre Southampton UK
15 Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
16 Department of Earth & Planetary Science University of California Santa Cruz CA USA
author_facet De Vleeschouwer, David
Penman, Donald E.
D'haenens, Simon
Wu, Fei
Westerhold, Thomas
Vahlenkamp, Maximilian
Cappelli, Carlotta
Agnini, Claudia
Kordesch, Wendy E. C.
King, Daniel J.
van der Ploeg, Robin
Pälike, Heiko
Turner, Sandra Kirtland
Wilson, Paul
Norris, Richard D.
Zachos, James C.
Bohaty, Steven M.
Hull, Pincelli M.
3 Department of Geosciences Utah State University Logan UT USA
4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Yale University New Haven CT USA
7 School of Earth Sciences State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources China University of Geosciences Wuhan China
2 MARUM ‐ Center for Marine Environmental Sciences University of Bremen Bremen Germany
8 Dipartimento di Geoscienze Università di Padova Padova Italy
9 Greater Farallones Association San Francisco CA USA
10 School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand
11 Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
13 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of California – Riverside Riverside CA USA
14 Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton National Oceanography Centre Southampton UK
15 Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
16 Department of Earth & Planetary Science University of California Santa Cruz CA USA
author_sort De Vleeschouwer, David
title North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System
title_short North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System
title_full North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System
title_fullStr North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System
title_full_unstemmed North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System
title_sort north atlantic drift sediments constrain eocene tidal dissipation and the evolution of the earth‐moon system
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004555
http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/11187
genre Newfoundland
North Atlantic
genre_facet Newfoundland
North Atlantic
op_relation doi:10.1029/2022PA004555
http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/11187
op_rights This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004555
container_title Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
container_volume 38
container_issue 2
_version_ 1785564176794517504
spelling ftsubggeo:oai:e-docs.geo-leo.de:11858/11187 2023-12-17T10:44:51+01:00 North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth‐Moon System De Vleeschouwer, David Penman, Donald E. D'haenens, Simon Wu, Fei Westerhold, Thomas Vahlenkamp, Maximilian Cappelli, Carlotta Agnini, Claudia Kordesch, Wendy E. C. King, Daniel J. van der Ploeg, Robin Pälike, Heiko Turner, Sandra Kirtland Wilson, Paul Norris, Richard D. Zachos, James C. Bohaty, Steven M. Hull, Pincelli M. 3 Department of Geosciences Utah State University Logan UT USA 4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Yale University New Haven CT USA 7 School of Earth Sciences State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources China University of Geosciences Wuhan China 2 MARUM ‐ Center for Marine Environmental Sciences University of Bremen Bremen Germany 8 Dipartimento di Geoscienze Università di Padova Padova Italy 9 Greater Farallones Association San Francisco CA USA 10 School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand 11 Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands 13 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of California – Riverside Riverside CA USA 14 Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton National Oceanography Centre Southampton UK 15 Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA 16 Department of Earth & Planetary Science University of California Santa Cruz CA USA 2023-02-09 https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004555 http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/11187 eng eng doi:10.1029/2022PA004555 http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gldocs-11858/11187 This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ddc:551 North Atlantic Eocene cyclostratigraphy astrochronology doc-type:article 2023 ftsubggeo https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004555 2023-11-19T23:12:31Z Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology are now at the forefront of geologic timekeeping. While this technique heavily relies on the accuracy of astronomical calculations, solar system chaos limits how far back astronomical calculations can be performed with confidence. High‐resolution paleoclimate records with Milankovitch imprints now allow reversing the traditional cyclostratigraphic approach: Middle Eocene drift sediments from Newfoundland Ridge are well‐suited for this purpose, due to high sedimentation rates and distinct lithological cycles. Per contra, the stratigraphies of Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Sites U1408–U1410 are highly complex with several hiatuses. Here, we built a two‐site composite and constructed a conservative age‐depth model to provide a reliable chronology for this rhythmic, highly resolved (<1 kyr) sedimentary archive. Astronomical components (g‐terms and precession constant) are extracted from proxy time‐series using two different techniques, producing consistent results. We find astronomical frequencies up to 4% lower than reported in astronomical solution La04. This solution, however, was smoothed over 20‐Myr intervals, and our results therefore provide constraints on g‐term variability on shorter, million‐year timescales. We also report first evidence that the g 4 –g 3 “grand eccentricity cycle” may have had a 1.2‐Myr period around 41 Ma, contrary to its 2.4‐Myr periodicity today. Our median precession constant estimate (51.28 ± 0.56″/year) confirms earlier indicators of a relatively low rate of tidal dissipation in the Paleogene. Newfoundland Ridge drift sediments thus enable a reliable reconstruction of astronomical components at the limit of validity of current astronomical calculations, extracted from geologic data, providing a new target for the next generation of astronomical calculations. Plain Language Summary: The traditional cyclostratigraphic approach is to align and correlate a geologic depth‐series with an astronomical solution. However, the chaotic nature of ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland North Atlantic GEO-LEOe-docs (FID GEO) Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology 38 2