The Effects of Access Restrictions and Communication Strategies for Divisive Environmental Management
In 2018, the U.S. National Park Service announced a controversial plan to translocate 20−30 gray wolves (Canis lupus) to Isle Royale National Park to increase genetic diversity and ultimately the dwindling wolf population. Media were restricted physical access during the translocations, citing safet...
| Published in: | Environmental Science & Policy |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
UST Research Online
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.stthomas.edu/cas_media_pub/17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.013 https://ir.stthomas.edu/context/cas_media_pub/article/1016/viewcontent/Killion_Freedman_Neuzil_Effects.pdf |
| Summary: | In 2018, the U.S. National Park Service announced a controversial plan to translocate 20−30 gray wolves (Canis lupus) to Isle Royale National Park to increase genetic diversity and ultimately the dwindling wolf population. Media were restricted physical access during the translocations, citing safety concerns for the wolves and management team, as well as logistical challenges because of the remoteness of the park. Given these restrictions, we used interviews and quantitative analyses of news stories and press releases to examine what communication strategies the National Park Service and its partners deployed and how access restriction affected the way news outlets covered the events. By identifying source diversity groups, we found U.S. government sources were predominately featured with few other source types included, and that coverage heavily relied on press release information. We discuss the implications of this communication strategy and potential consequences for access restrictions when covering divisive events in remote locations. |
|---|