Limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy

We present scanning superconducting quantum interference device microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc=1.5 K) and PrOs4Sb12 (Tc=1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to vi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Review B
Main Authors: Hicks, Clifford William, Kirtley, John R, Lippman, Thomas M, Koshnick, Nicholas C, Huber, Martin E, Maeno, Yoshiteru, Yuhasz, William M, Maple, M Brian, Moler, Kathryn A
Other Authors: University of St Andrews. School of Physics and Astronomy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
QC
IPY
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3294
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501
Description
Summary:We present scanning superconducting quantum interference device microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4 (Tc=1.5 K) and PrOs4Sb12 (Tc=1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However, in neither Sr2RuO4 nor PrOs4Sb12 do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr2RuO4, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a px±ipy superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ∼0.1% and ∼0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ∼30 nm for random domains or ∼500 nm for periodic domains. Publisher PDF Peer reviewed