Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence
Double-observer line transect methods are becoming increasingly widespread, especially for the estimation of marine mammal abundance from aerial and shipboard surveys when detection of animals on the line is uncertain. The resulting data supplement conventional distance sampling data with two-sample...
Published in: | Biometrics |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/1928 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949660683&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
id |
ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/1928 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/1928 2024-09-30T14:38:34+00:00 Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence Buckland, Stephen Terrence Laake, Jeffrey L. Borchers, David Louis University of St Andrews.School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews.Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland University of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Institute University of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Institute University of St Andrews.Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling 2011-07-22T11:00:10Z 9 372411 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10023/1928 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949660683&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng Biometrics 401968 f929d6e1-1769-4ac0-a560-532a9648a864 000275727200020 77949660683 Buckland , S T , Laake , J L & Borchers , D L 2010 , ' Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence ' , Biometrics , vol. 66 , no. 1 , pp. 169-177 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x 0006-341X standrews_research_output: 22395 ORCID: /0000-0002-3944-0754/work/72842437 ORCID: /0000-0002-9939-709X/work/73701012 https://hdl.handle.net/10023/1928 doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949660683&partnerID=8YFLogxK © International Biometric Society. This is an author version of this article. The definitive version is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com Distance sampling Double-observer methods Full independence Limiting independence Line transect sampling Point independence QA Mathematics SDG 14 - Life Below Water QA Journal article 2011 ftstandrewserep https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x 2024-09-11T00:10:43Z Double-observer line transect methods are becoming increasingly widespread, especially for the estimation of marine mammal abundance from aerial and shipboard surveys when detection of animals on the line is uncertain. The resulting data supplement conventional distance sampling data with two-sample mark–recapture data. Like conventional mark–recapture data, these have inherent problems for estimating abundance in the presence of heterogeneity. Unlike conventional mark–recapture methods, line transect methods use knowledge of the distribution of a covariate, which affects detection probability (namely, distance from the transect line) in inference. This knowledge can be used to diagnose unmodeled heterogeneity in the mark–recapture component of the data. By modeling the covariance in detection probabilities with distance, we show how the estimation problem can be formulated in terms of different levels of independence. At one extreme, full independence is assumed, as in the Petersen estimator (which does not use distance data); at the other extreme, independence only occurs in the limit as detection probability tends to one. Between the two extremes, there is a range of models, including those currently in common use, which have intermediate levels of independence. We show how this framework can be used to provide more reliable analysis of double-observer line transect data. We test the methods by simulation, and by analysis of a dataset for which true abundance is known. We illustrate the approach through analysis of minke whale sightings data from the North Sea and adjacent waters. Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper minke whale University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository Petersen ENVELOPE(-101.250,-101.250,-71.917,-71.917) Biometrics 66 1 169 177 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftstandrewserep |
language |
English |
topic |
Distance sampling Double-observer methods Full independence Limiting independence Line transect sampling Point independence QA Mathematics SDG 14 - Life Below Water QA |
spellingShingle |
Distance sampling Double-observer methods Full independence Limiting independence Line transect sampling Point independence QA Mathematics SDG 14 - Life Below Water QA Buckland, Stephen Terrence Laake, Jeffrey L. Borchers, David Louis Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence |
topic_facet |
Distance sampling Double-observer methods Full independence Limiting independence Line transect sampling Point independence QA Mathematics SDG 14 - Life Below Water QA |
description |
Double-observer line transect methods are becoming increasingly widespread, especially for the estimation of marine mammal abundance from aerial and shipboard surveys when detection of animals on the line is uncertain. The resulting data supplement conventional distance sampling data with two-sample mark–recapture data. Like conventional mark–recapture data, these have inherent problems for estimating abundance in the presence of heterogeneity. Unlike conventional mark–recapture methods, line transect methods use knowledge of the distribution of a covariate, which affects detection probability (namely, distance from the transect line) in inference. This knowledge can be used to diagnose unmodeled heterogeneity in the mark–recapture component of the data. By modeling the covariance in detection probabilities with distance, we show how the estimation problem can be formulated in terms of different levels of independence. At one extreme, full independence is assumed, as in the Petersen estimator (which does not use distance data); at the other extreme, independence only occurs in the limit as detection probability tends to one. Between the two extremes, there is a range of models, including those currently in common use, which have intermediate levels of independence. We show how this framework can be used to provide more reliable analysis of double-observer line transect data. We test the methods by simulation, and by analysis of a dataset for which true abundance is known. We illustrate the approach through analysis of minke whale sightings data from the North Sea and adjacent waters. Peer reviewed |
author2 |
University of St Andrews.School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews.Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland University of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Institute University of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Institute University of St Andrews.Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Buckland, Stephen Terrence Laake, Jeffrey L. Borchers, David Louis |
author_facet |
Buckland, Stephen Terrence Laake, Jeffrey L. Borchers, David Louis |
author_sort |
Buckland, Stephen Terrence |
title |
Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence |
title_short |
Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence |
title_full |
Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence |
title_fullStr |
Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence |
title_sort |
double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10023/1928 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949660683&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-101.250,-101.250,-71.917,-71.917) |
geographic |
Petersen |
geographic_facet |
Petersen |
genre |
minke whale |
genre_facet |
minke whale |
op_relation |
Biometrics 401968 f929d6e1-1769-4ac0-a560-532a9648a864 000275727200020 77949660683 Buckland , S T , Laake , J L & Borchers , D L 2010 , ' Double-observer line transect methods : levels of independence ' , Biometrics , vol. 66 , no. 1 , pp. 169-177 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x 0006-341X standrews_research_output: 22395 ORCID: /0000-0002-3944-0754/work/72842437 ORCID: /0000-0002-9939-709X/work/73701012 https://hdl.handle.net/10023/1928 doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949660683&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
op_rights |
© International Biometric Society. This is an author version of this article. The definitive version is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x |
container_title |
Biometrics |
container_volume |
66 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
169 |
op_container_end_page |
177 |
_version_ |
1811641196646236160 |