Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data

The design and funding for aerial surveys were provided by Ireland's Dept of Communication, Climate Action and Environment and the Dept of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, under the ObSERVE Programme established in 2014. We are grateful for the support and assistance of both Depts in undert...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecography
Main Authors: Critchley, E. J., Grecian, W. J., Bennison, A., Kane, A., Wischnewski, S., Canadas, A., Tierney, D., Quinn, J. L., Jessopp, M. J.
Other Authors: University of St Andrews. School of Biology, University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
DAS
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18945
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653
id ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/18945
record_format openpolar
spelling ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/18945 2023-07-02T03:29:30+02:00 Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data Critchley, E. J. Grecian, W. J. Bennison, A. Kane, A. Wischnewski, S. Canadas, A. Tierney, D. Quinn, J. L. Jessopp, M. J. University of St Andrews. School of Biology University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit 2019-11-18T12:30:07Z 13 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18945 https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653 eng eng Ecography Critchley , E J , Grecian , W J , Bennison , A , Kane , A , Wischnewski , S , Canadas , A , Tierney , D , Quinn , J L & Jessopp , M J 2019 , ' Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data ' , Ecography , vol. Early View . https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653 0906-7590 PURE: 263350485 PURE UUID: 4d1b31c5-e0ab-49de-b430-5068c5f88adc WOS: 000494283700001 Scopus: 85074788812 ORCID: /0000-0002-6428-719X/work/65014439 http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18945 https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653 Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley & Sons on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Aerial survey Biotelemetry Central place foragers Foraging radius Seabirds Species distribution modelling QH301 Biology DAS QH301 Journal article 2019 ftstandrewserep https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653 2023-06-13T18:27:56Z The design and funding for aerial surveys were provided by Ireland's Dept of Communication, Climate Action and Environment and the Dept of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, under the ObSERVE Programme established in 2014. We are grateful for the support and assistance of both Depts in undertaking this work. Funding for development of projected distributions was provided by the Petroleum Infrastructure Program (IS013/08), and funding for telemetry work was provided by the Zoological Society of London (Good gifts programme), Petroleum Infrastructure Programme (IS013/08) and the Irish Research Council (GOIPD/2015/81) Ireland's Dept of Agriculture, Fisheries and the Marine. Relatively simple foraging radius models have the potential to generate predictive distributions for a large number of species rapidly, thus providing a cost‐effective alternative to large‐scale surveys or complex modelling approaches. Their effectiveness, however, remains largely untested. Here we compare foraging radius distribution models for all breeding seabirds in Ireland, to distributions of empirical data collected from tracking studies and aerial surveys. At the local/colony level, we compared foraging radius distributions to GPS tracking data from seabirds with short (Atlantic puffin Fratercula arctica, and razorbill Alca torda) and long (Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus, and European storm‐petrel Hydrobates pelagicus) foraging ranges. At the regional/national level, we compared foraging radius distributions to extensive aerial surveys conducted over a two‐year period. Foraging radius distributions were significantly positively correlated with tracking data for all species except Manx shearwater. Correlations between foraging radius distributions and aerial survey data were also significant, but generally weaker than those for tracking data. Correlations between foraging radius distributions and aerial survey data were benchmarked against generalised additive models (GAMs) of the aerial survey data that included a range of ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Alca torda Atlantic puffin fratercula Fratercula arctica Razorbill University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository Ecography 43 2 184 196
institution Open Polar
collection University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository
op_collection_id ftstandrewserep
language English
topic Aerial survey
Biotelemetry
Central place foragers
Foraging radius
Seabirds
Species distribution modelling
QH301 Biology
DAS
QH301
spellingShingle Aerial survey
Biotelemetry
Central place foragers
Foraging radius
Seabirds
Species distribution modelling
QH301 Biology
DAS
QH301
Critchley, E. J.
Grecian, W. J.
Bennison, A.
Kane, A.
Wischnewski, S.
Canadas, A.
Tierney, D.
Quinn, J. L.
Jessopp, M. J.
Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data
topic_facet Aerial survey
Biotelemetry
Central place foragers
Foraging radius
Seabirds
Species distribution modelling
QH301 Biology
DAS
QH301
description The design and funding for aerial surveys were provided by Ireland's Dept of Communication, Climate Action and Environment and the Dept of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, under the ObSERVE Programme established in 2014. We are grateful for the support and assistance of both Depts in undertaking this work. Funding for development of projected distributions was provided by the Petroleum Infrastructure Program (IS013/08), and funding for telemetry work was provided by the Zoological Society of London (Good gifts programme), Petroleum Infrastructure Programme (IS013/08) and the Irish Research Council (GOIPD/2015/81) Ireland's Dept of Agriculture, Fisheries and the Marine. Relatively simple foraging radius models have the potential to generate predictive distributions for a large number of species rapidly, thus providing a cost‐effective alternative to large‐scale surveys or complex modelling approaches. Their effectiveness, however, remains largely untested. Here we compare foraging radius distribution models for all breeding seabirds in Ireland, to distributions of empirical data collected from tracking studies and aerial surveys. At the local/colony level, we compared foraging radius distributions to GPS tracking data from seabirds with short (Atlantic puffin Fratercula arctica, and razorbill Alca torda) and long (Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus, and European storm‐petrel Hydrobates pelagicus) foraging ranges. At the regional/national level, we compared foraging radius distributions to extensive aerial surveys conducted over a two‐year period. Foraging radius distributions were significantly positively correlated with tracking data for all species except Manx shearwater. Correlations between foraging radius distributions and aerial survey data were also significant, but generally weaker than those for tracking data. Correlations between foraging radius distributions and aerial survey data were benchmarked against generalised additive models (GAMs) of the aerial survey data that included a range of ...
author2 University of St Andrews. School of Biology
University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute
University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Critchley, E. J.
Grecian, W. J.
Bennison, A.
Kane, A.
Wischnewski, S.
Canadas, A.
Tierney, D.
Quinn, J. L.
Jessopp, M. J.
author_facet Critchley, E. J.
Grecian, W. J.
Bennison, A.
Kane, A.
Wischnewski, S.
Canadas, A.
Tierney, D.
Quinn, J. L.
Jessopp, M. J.
author_sort Critchley, E. J.
title Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data
title_short Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data
title_full Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data
title_fullStr Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data
title_sort assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18945
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653
genre Alca torda
Atlantic puffin
fratercula
Fratercula arctica
Razorbill
genre_facet Alca torda
Atlantic puffin
fratercula
Fratercula arctica
Razorbill
op_relation Ecography
Critchley , E J , Grecian , W J , Bennison , A , Kane , A , Wischnewski , S , Canadas , A , Tierney , D , Quinn , J L & Jessopp , M J 2019 , ' Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data ' , Ecography , vol. Early View . https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653
0906-7590
PURE: 263350485
PURE UUID: 4d1b31c5-e0ab-49de-b430-5068c5f88adc
WOS: 000494283700001
Scopus: 85074788812
ORCID: /0000-0002-6428-719X/work/65014439
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18945
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653
op_rights Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley & Sons on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04653
container_title Ecography
container_volume 43
container_issue 2
container_start_page 184
op_container_end_page 196
_version_ 1770274793272115200