Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes
This study was funded by the Russian Fund for the Fundamental Research (grant No. 18-04-00462). Call classifications by human observers are often subjective yet they are critical to studies of animal communication, because only the categories that are relevant for the animals themselves actually mak...
Published in: | Bioacoustics |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18808 https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 |
id |
ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/18808 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/18808 2023-07-02T03:32:50+02:00 Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes Danishevskaya, Anastasya Yu. Filatova, Olga A. Samarra, Filipa I P. Miller, Patrick J O. Ford, John K B Yurk, Harald Matkin, Craig O. Hoyt, Erich University of St Andrews. School of Biology University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute University of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences University of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolution University of St Andrews. Bioacoustics group 2019-10-31 13 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18808 https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 eng eng Bioacoustics Danishevskaya , A Y , Filatova , O A , Samarra , F I P , Miller , P J O , Ford , J K B , Yurk , H , Matkin , C O & Hoyt , E 2018 , ' Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes ' , Bioacoustics , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 0952-4622 PURE: 256460382 PURE UUID: 181522d2-d6f6-43d3-bf87-e76c23a7e6db RIS: urn:2AE82DDA7959EFAD287D6A771385E1FC Scopus: 85055862864 WOS: 000507252300002 http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18808 https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 © 2018, Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 Crowd intelligence Categorization Killer whale Dialect GC Oceanography QH301 Biology NDAS GC QH301 Journal article 2019 ftstandrewserep https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 2023-06-13T18:28:17Z This study was funded by the Russian Fund for the Fundamental Research (grant No. 18-04-00462). Call classifications by human observers are often subjective yet they are critical to studies of animal communication, because only the categories that are relevant for the animals themselves actually make sense in terms of correlation to the context. In this paper we test whether independent observers can correctly detect differences and similarities in killer whale repertoires. We used repertoires with different a priori levels of similarity: from different ecotypes, from different oceans, from different populations within the same ocean, and from different local subpopulations of the same population. Calls from nine killer whale populations/subpopulations were pooled into a joint sample set, and eight independent observers were asked to classify the calls into separate categories. None of the observers’ classifications strongly followed the known phylogeny of the analyzed repertoires. However, some phylogenetic relationships were reflected in the classifications substantially better than others. Most observers correctly separated the calls from two North Pacific ecotypes. Call classifications averaged across multiple observers reflected the known repertoire phylogenies better than individual classifications, and revealed the similarity of repertoires at the level of subpopulations within the same population, or closely related populations. Postprint Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Killer Whale Killer whale University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository Pacific Bioacoustics 29 1 15 27 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftstandrewserep |
language |
English |
topic |
Crowd intelligence Categorization Killer whale Dialect GC Oceanography QH301 Biology NDAS GC QH301 |
spellingShingle |
Crowd intelligence Categorization Killer whale Dialect GC Oceanography QH301 Biology NDAS GC QH301 Danishevskaya, Anastasya Yu. Filatova, Olga A. Samarra, Filipa I P. Miller, Patrick J O. Ford, John K B Yurk, Harald Matkin, Craig O. Hoyt, Erich Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes |
topic_facet |
Crowd intelligence Categorization Killer whale Dialect GC Oceanography QH301 Biology NDAS GC QH301 |
description |
This study was funded by the Russian Fund for the Fundamental Research (grant No. 18-04-00462). Call classifications by human observers are often subjective yet they are critical to studies of animal communication, because only the categories that are relevant for the animals themselves actually make sense in terms of correlation to the context. In this paper we test whether independent observers can correctly detect differences and similarities in killer whale repertoires. We used repertoires with different a priori levels of similarity: from different ecotypes, from different oceans, from different populations within the same ocean, and from different local subpopulations of the same population. Calls from nine killer whale populations/subpopulations were pooled into a joint sample set, and eight independent observers were asked to classify the calls into separate categories. None of the observers’ classifications strongly followed the known phylogeny of the analyzed repertoires. However, some phylogenetic relationships were reflected in the classifications substantially better than others. Most observers correctly separated the calls from two North Pacific ecotypes. Call classifications averaged across multiple observers reflected the known repertoire phylogenies better than individual classifications, and revealed the similarity of repertoires at the level of subpopulations within the same population, or closely related populations. Postprint Peer reviewed |
author2 |
University of St Andrews. School of Biology University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute University of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences University of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolution University of St Andrews. Bioacoustics group |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Danishevskaya, Anastasya Yu. Filatova, Olga A. Samarra, Filipa I P. Miller, Patrick J O. Ford, John K B Yurk, Harald Matkin, Craig O. Hoyt, Erich |
author_facet |
Danishevskaya, Anastasya Yu. Filatova, Olga A. Samarra, Filipa I P. Miller, Patrick J O. Ford, John K B Yurk, Harald Matkin, Craig O. Hoyt, Erich |
author_sort |
Danishevskaya, Anastasya Yu. |
title |
Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes |
title_short |
Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes |
title_full |
Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes |
title_fullStr |
Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes |
title_sort |
crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18808 https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 |
geographic |
Pacific |
geographic_facet |
Pacific |
genre |
Killer Whale Killer whale |
genre_facet |
Killer Whale Killer whale |
op_relation |
Bioacoustics Danishevskaya , A Y , Filatova , O A , Samarra , F I P , Miller , P J O , Ford , J K B , Yurk , H , Matkin , C O & Hoyt , E 2018 , ' Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes ' , Bioacoustics , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 0952-4622 PURE: 256460382 PURE UUID: 181522d2-d6f6-43d3-bf87-e76c23a7e6db RIS: urn:2AE82DDA7959EFAD287D6A771385E1FC Scopus: 85055862864 WOS: 000507252300002 http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18808 https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 |
op_rights |
© 2018, Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1538902 |
container_title |
Bioacoustics |
container_volume |
29 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
15 |
op_container_end_page |
27 |
_version_ |
1770272517559156736 |