Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice

Geomorphological mapping is a well-established method for examining earth surface processes and landscape evolution in a range of environmental contexts. In glacial research, it provides crucial data for a wide range of process-oriented studies and palaeoglaciological reconstructions; in the latter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth-Science Reviews
Main Authors: Chandler, Benjamin M.P., Lovell, Harold, Boston, Clare M., Lukas, Sven, Barr, Iestyn D., Benediktsson, Ívar Örn, Benn, Douglas I., Clark, Chris D., Darvill, Christopher M., Evans, David J.A., Ewertowski, Marek W., Loibl, David, Margold, Martin, Otto, Jan-Christoph, Roberts, David H., Stokes, Chris R., Storrar, Robert D., Stroeven, Arjen P.
Other Authors: University of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Institute
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
GIS
G1
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015
id ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/18224
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository
op_collection_id ftstandrewserep
language English
topic Glacial geomorphology
Geomorphological mapping
GIS
Remote sensing
Field mapping
G Geography (General)
G1
spellingShingle Glacial geomorphology
Geomorphological mapping
GIS
Remote sensing
Field mapping
G Geography (General)
G1
Chandler, Benjamin M.P.
Lovell, Harold
Boston, Clare M.
Lukas, Sven
Barr, Iestyn D.
Benediktsson, Ívar Örn
Benn, Douglas I.
Clark, Chris D.
Darvill, Christopher M.
Evans, David J.A.
Ewertowski, Marek W.
Loibl, David
Margold, Martin
Otto, Jan-Christoph
Roberts, David H.
Stokes, Chris R.
Storrar, Robert D.
Stroeven, Arjen P.
Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice
topic_facet Glacial geomorphology
Geomorphological mapping
GIS
Remote sensing
Field mapping
G Geography (General)
G1
description Geomorphological mapping is a well-established method for examining earth surface processes and landscape evolution in a range of environmental contexts. In glacial research, it provides crucial data for a wide range of process-oriented studies and palaeoglaciological reconstructions; in the latter case providing an essential geomorphological framework for establishing glacial chronologies. In recent decades, there have been significant developments in remote sensing and Geographical Information Systems (GIS), with a plethora of high-quality remotely-sensed datasets now (often freely) available. Most recently, the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology has allowed sub-decimetre scale aerial images and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) to be obtained. Traditional field mapping methods still have an important role in glacial geomorphology, particularly in cirque glacier, valley glacier and icefield/ice-cap outlet settings. Field mapping is also used in ice sheet settings, but often takes the form of necessarily highly-selective ground-truthing of remote mapping. Given the increasing abundance of datasets and methods available for mapping, effective approaches are necessary to enable assimilation of data and ensure robustness. This paper provides a review and assessment of the various glacial geomorphological methods and datasets currently available, with a focus on their applicability in particular glacial settings. We distinguish two overarching ‘work streams’ that recognise the different approaches typically used in mapping landforms produced by ice masses of different sizes: (i) mapping of ice sheet geomorphological imprints using a combined remote sensing approach, with some field checking (where feasible); and (ii) mapping of alpine and plateau-style ice mass (cirque glacier, valley glacier, icefield and ice-cap) geomorphological imprints using remote sensing and considerable field mapping. Key challenges to accurate and robust geomorphological mapping are highlighted, often necessitating ...
author2 University of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Development
University of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Institute
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Chandler, Benjamin M.P.
Lovell, Harold
Boston, Clare M.
Lukas, Sven
Barr, Iestyn D.
Benediktsson, Ívar Örn
Benn, Douglas I.
Clark, Chris D.
Darvill, Christopher M.
Evans, David J.A.
Ewertowski, Marek W.
Loibl, David
Margold, Martin
Otto, Jan-Christoph
Roberts, David H.
Stokes, Chris R.
Storrar, Robert D.
Stroeven, Arjen P.
author_facet Chandler, Benjamin M.P.
Lovell, Harold
Boston, Clare M.
Lukas, Sven
Barr, Iestyn D.
Benediktsson, Ívar Örn
Benn, Douglas I.
Clark, Chris D.
Darvill, Christopher M.
Evans, David J.A.
Ewertowski, Marek W.
Loibl, David
Margold, Martin
Otto, Jan-Christoph
Roberts, David H.
Stokes, Chris R.
Storrar, Robert D.
Stroeven, Arjen P.
author_sort Chandler, Benjamin M.P.
title Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice
title_short Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice
title_full Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice
title_fullStr Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice
title_full_unstemmed Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice
title_sort glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015
genre Ice cap
Ice Sheet
genre_facet Ice cap
Ice Sheet
op_relation Earth Science Reviews
Chandler , B M P , Lovell , H , Boston , C M , Lukas , S , Barr , I D , Benediktsson , Í Ö , Benn , D I , Clark , C D , Darvill , C M , Evans , D J A , Ewertowski , M W , Loibl , D , Margold , M , Otto , J-C , Roberts , D H , Stokes , C R , Storrar , R D & Stroeven , A P 2018 , ' Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice ' , Earth Science Reviews , vol. 185 , pp. 806-846 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015
0012-8252
PURE: 255192642
PURE UUID: 82548d45-dd49-4e40-b030-2ae87349aff7
RIS: urn:7627AC059224B6B5B4F86E902D6FEB7B
Scopus: 85051365154
WOS: 000448493500037
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015
op_rights © 2018 Elsevier B.V. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015
container_title Earth-Science Reviews
container_volume 185
container_start_page 806
op_container_end_page 846
_version_ 1770272163709845504
spelling ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/18224 2023-07-02T03:32:34+02:00 Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice Chandler, Benjamin M.P. Lovell, Harold Boston, Clare M. Lukas, Sven Barr, Iestyn D. Benediktsson, Ívar Örn Benn, Douglas I. Clark, Chris D. Darvill, Christopher M. Evans, David J.A. Ewertowski, Marek W. Loibl, David Margold, Martin Otto, Jan-Christoph Roberts, David H. Stokes, Chris R. Storrar, Robert D. Stroeven, Arjen P. University of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Development University of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Institute 2019-08-01 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18224 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015 eng eng Earth Science Reviews Chandler , B M P , Lovell , H , Boston , C M , Lukas , S , Barr , I D , Benediktsson , Í Ö , Benn , D I , Clark , C D , Darvill , C M , Evans , D J A , Ewertowski , M W , Loibl , D , Margold , M , Otto , J-C , Roberts , D H , Stokes , C R , Storrar , R D & Stroeven , A P 2018 , ' Glacial geomorphological mapping : a review of approaches and frameworks for best practice ' , Earth Science Reviews , vol. 185 , pp. 806-846 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015 0012-8252 PURE: 255192642 PURE UUID: 82548d45-dd49-4e40-b030-2ae87349aff7 RIS: urn:7627AC059224B6B5B4F86E902D6FEB7B Scopus: 85051365154 WOS: 000448493500037 http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18224 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015 © 2018 Elsevier B.V. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015 Glacial geomorphology Geomorphological mapping GIS Remote sensing Field mapping G Geography (General) G1 Journal item 2019 ftstandrewserep https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.015 2023-06-13T18:28:24Z Geomorphological mapping is a well-established method for examining earth surface processes and landscape evolution in a range of environmental contexts. In glacial research, it provides crucial data for a wide range of process-oriented studies and palaeoglaciological reconstructions; in the latter case providing an essential geomorphological framework for establishing glacial chronologies. In recent decades, there have been significant developments in remote sensing and Geographical Information Systems (GIS), with a plethora of high-quality remotely-sensed datasets now (often freely) available. Most recently, the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology has allowed sub-decimetre scale aerial images and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) to be obtained. Traditional field mapping methods still have an important role in glacial geomorphology, particularly in cirque glacier, valley glacier and icefield/ice-cap outlet settings. Field mapping is also used in ice sheet settings, but often takes the form of necessarily highly-selective ground-truthing of remote mapping. Given the increasing abundance of datasets and methods available for mapping, effective approaches are necessary to enable assimilation of data and ensure robustness. This paper provides a review and assessment of the various glacial geomorphological methods and datasets currently available, with a focus on their applicability in particular glacial settings. We distinguish two overarching ‘work streams’ that recognise the different approaches typically used in mapping landforms produced by ice masses of different sizes: (i) mapping of ice sheet geomorphological imprints using a combined remote sensing approach, with some field checking (where feasible); and (ii) mapping of alpine and plateau-style ice mass (cirque glacier, valley glacier, icefield and ice-cap) geomorphological imprints using remote sensing and considerable field mapping. Key challenges to accurate and robust geomorphological mapping are highlighted, often necessitating ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice cap Ice Sheet University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository Earth-Science Reviews 185 806 846