Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise

The work was funded under Scottish Government grant MMSS/001/11 and contract CR/2014/04, and supported by National Capability funding from NERC to SMRU (grant no. SMRU1001). Seal at-sea usage maps, location data for individual seals, locations and source levels for vessels, and SPLs from monitoring...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Ecology
Main Authors: Jones, Esther L., Hastie, Gordon D., Smout, Sophie, Onoufriou, Joseph, Merchant, Nathan D., Brookes, Kate L., Thompson, David
Other Authors: NERC, University of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews. School of Biology, University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland, University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
AIS
DAS
BDC
R2C
QL
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10023/11459
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12911
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12911#footer-support-info
id ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/11459
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository
op_collection_id ftstandrewserep
language English
topic Halichoerus grypus
Phoca vitulina
Spatial overlap
AIS
Telemetry
Acoustic propagation
Marine stressor
MSFD
Noise pollution
Uncertainty
QH301 Biology
QL Zoology
DAS
NERC
BDC
R2C
SDG 14 - Life Below Water
QH301
QL
spellingShingle Halichoerus grypus
Phoca vitulina
Spatial overlap
AIS
Telemetry
Acoustic propagation
Marine stressor
MSFD
Noise pollution
Uncertainty
QH301 Biology
QL Zoology
DAS
NERC
BDC
R2C
SDG 14 - Life Below Water
QH301
QL
Jones, Esther L.
Hastie, Gordon D.
Smout, Sophie
Onoufriou, Joseph
Merchant, Nathan D.
Brookes, Kate L.
Thompson, David
Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise
topic_facet Halichoerus grypus
Phoca vitulina
Spatial overlap
AIS
Telemetry
Acoustic propagation
Marine stressor
MSFD
Noise pollution
Uncertainty
QH301 Biology
QL Zoology
DAS
NERC
BDC
R2C
SDG 14 - Life Below Water
QH301
QL
description The work was funded under Scottish Government grant MMSS/001/11 and contract CR/2014/04, and supported by National Capability funding from NERC to SMRU (grant no. SMRU1001). Seal at-sea usage maps, location data for individual seals, locations and source levels for vessels, and SPLs from monitoring data used for acoustic validations are available from the Pure repository, https://doi.org/10.17630/89ac9345-240a-41bb-8f53-b3f14bb114c0. 1. Vessels can have acute and chronic impacts on marine species. The rate of increase in commercial shipping is accelerating, and there is a need to quantify and potentially manage the risk of these impacts. 2. Usage maps characterising densities of grey and harbour seals and ships around the British Isles were used to produce risk maps of seal co-occurrence with shipping traffic. Acoustic exposure to individual harbour seals was modelled in a study area using contemporaneous movement data from 28 animals fitted with UHF global positioning satellite telemetry tags and automatic identification system data from all ships during 2014 and 2015. Data from four acoustic recorders were used to validate sound exposure predictions. 3. Across the British Isles, rates of co-occurrence were highest within 50 km of the coast, close to seal haul-outs. Areas identified with high risk of exposure included 11 Special Areas of Conservation (SAC; from a possible 25). Risk to harbour seal populations was highest, affecting half of all SACs associated with the species. 4. Predicted cumulative sound exposure level, cSELs(Mpw), over all seals was 176·8 dB re 1 μPa2 s (95% CI 163·3–190·4), ranging from 170·2 dB re 1μPa2 s (95% CI 168·4–171·9) to 189·3 dB re 1 μPa2 s (95% CI 172·6–206·0) for individuals. This represented an increase in 28·3 dB re 1 μPa2 s over measured ambient noise. For 20 of 28 animals in the study, 95% CI for cSELs(Mpw) had upper bounds above levels known to induce temporary threshold shift. Predictions of broadband received sound pressure levels were underestimated on average by 0·7 ...
author2 NERC
University of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statistics
University of St Andrews. School of Biology
University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute
University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland
University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit
University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jones, Esther L.
Hastie, Gordon D.
Smout, Sophie
Onoufriou, Joseph
Merchant, Nathan D.
Brookes, Kate L.
Thompson, David
author_facet Jones, Esther L.
Hastie, Gordon D.
Smout, Sophie
Onoufriou, Joseph
Merchant, Nathan D.
Brookes, Kate L.
Thompson, David
author_sort Jones, Esther L.
title Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise
title_short Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise
title_full Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise
title_fullStr Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise
title_full_unstemmed Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise
title_sort seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10023/11459
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12911
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12911#footer-support-info
genre harbour seal
Phoca vitulina
genre_facet harbour seal
Phoca vitulina
op_relation Journal of Applied Ecology
249240268
01d450ab-6903-4bec-9ceb-af5a42623784
000415194000033
85018323852
Jones , E L , Hastie , G D , Smout , S , Onoufriou , J , Merchant , N D , Brookes , K L & Thompson , D 2017 , ' Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise ' , Journal of Applied Ecology , vol. 54 , no. 6 , pp. 1930-1940 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12911
0021-8901
ORCID: /0000-0002-4409-5860/work/32284239
ORCID: /0000-0002-9773-2755/work/54819193
ORCID: /0000-0003-1546-2876/work/56862181
https://hdl.handle.net/10023/11459
doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12911
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12911#footer-support-info
Agreement R8-H12-86
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12911
container_title Journal of Applied Ecology
container_volume 54
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1930
op_container_end_page 1940
_version_ 1797584276003225600
spelling ftstandrewserep:oai:research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk:10023/11459 2024-04-28T08:23:04+00:00 Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise Jones, Esther L. Hastie, Gordon D. Smout, Sophie Onoufriou, Joseph Merchant, Nathan D. Brookes, Kate L. Thompson, David NERC University of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews. School of Biology University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling 2017-08-15T08:45:07Z 1216493 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10023/11459 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12911 https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12911#footer-support-info eng eng Journal of Applied Ecology 249240268 01d450ab-6903-4bec-9ceb-af5a42623784 000415194000033 85018323852 Jones , E L , Hastie , G D , Smout , S , Onoufriou , J , Merchant , N D , Brookes , K L & Thompson , D 2017 , ' Seals and shipping : quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise ' , Journal of Applied Ecology , vol. 54 , no. 6 , pp. 1930-1940 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12911 0021-8901 ORCID: /0000-0002-4409-5860/work/32284239 ORCID: /0000-0002-9773-2755/work/54819193 ORCID: /0000-0003-1546-2876/work/56862181 https://hdl.handle.net/10023/11459 doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12911 https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12911#footer-support-info Agreement R8-H12-86 Halichoerus grypus Phoca vitulina Spatial overlap AIS Telemetry Acoustic propagation Marine stressor MSFD Noise pollution Uncertainty QH301 Biology QL Zoology DAS NERC BDC R2C SDG 14 - Life Below Water QH301 QL Journal article 2017 ftstandrewserep https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12911 2024-04-09T23:33:08Z The work was funded under Scottish Government grant MMSS/001/11 and contract CR/2014/04, and supported by National Capability funding from NERC to SMRU (grant no. SMRU1001). Seal at-sea usage maps, location data for individual seals, locations and source levels for vessels, and SPLs from monitoring data used for acoustic validations are available from the Pure repository, https://doi.org/10.17630/89ac9345-240a-41bb-8f53-b3f14bb114c0. 1. Vessels can have acute and chronic impacts on marine species. The rate of increase in commercial shipping is accelerating, and there is a need to quantify and potentially manage the risk of these impacts. 2. Usage maps characterising densities of grey and harbour seals and ships around the British Isles were used to produce risk maps of seal co-occurrence with shipping traffic. Acoustic exposure to individual harbour seals was modelled in a study area using contemporaneous movement data from 28 animals fitted with UHF global positioning satellite telemetry tags and automatic identification system data from all ships during 2014 and 2015. Data from four acoustic recorders were used to validate sound exposure predictions. 3. Across the British Isles, rates of co-occurrence were highest within 50 km of the coast, close to seal haul-outs. Areas identified with high risk of exposure included 11 Special Areas of Conservation (SAC; from a possible 25). Risk to harbour seal populations was highest, affecting half of all SACs associated with the species. 4. Predicted cumulative sound exposure level, cSELs(Mpw), over all seals was 176·8 dB re 1 μPa2 s (95% CI 163·3–190·4), ranging from 170·2 dB re 1μPa2 s (95% CI 168·4–171·9) to 189·3 dB re 1 μPa2 s (95% CI 172·6–206·0) for individuals. This represented an increase in 28·3 dB re 1 μPa2 s over measured ambient noise. For 20 of 28 animals in the study, 95% CI for cSELs(Mpw) had upper bounds above levels known to induce temporary threshold shift. Predictions of broadband received sound pressure levels were underestimated on average by 0·7 ... Article in Journal/Newspaper harbour seal Phoca vitulina University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository Journal of Applied Ecology 54 6 1930 1940