Russia in the Arctic: development plans, military potential, and conflict prevention

• Main Authors: Paul, Michael, Swistek, Göran
• Other Authors: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit
• Format: Report
• Language: unknown
• Published: DEU 2022
• Subjects: Internationale Beziehungen; Politikwissenschaft; International relations; Political science; Regionale strategische Konzeption; Arktis; Arktisches Meer; Konfliktprävention; Entwicklungspolitik; Friedens- und Konfliktforschung; Sicherheitspolitik; International Politics; Foreign Affairs; Development Policy; Peace and Conflict Research; International Conflicts; Security Policy; Russland; Nordpolargebiet; Geopolitik; Interessenpolitik; Russia; Arctic; geopolitics; pressure-group politics; 10500; Arktis*; Climate change; Nordpol*; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78024; http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-78024-7; https://doi.org/10.18449/2022RP03

Russia wants to realise a high degree of self-regulated stability in the Arctic. Moscow considers this necessary for overcoming the many problems and obstacles to development that are linked to its ambitious plans as well as the consequences of climate change. The regression of sea ice is perceived as a loss of security by the Kremlin, which reinforces its traditional siege mentality. Russian foreign policy is shaped by a reflexive priorisation of security policy above all, even in the Arctic region. Moscow tries to guarantee its national security (including economic inter­ests) by using a broad spectrum of military build-up and corresponding strategic initiatives, which include new nuclear weapons systems. Other Arctic states as well as neighbouring countries and NATO consider these efforts a threat. Russia takes a defensive attitude in the Arctic, but it is prepared for rapid escalation in the event of confrontation. Russia's Arctic policy is a part of its strategy for exerting economic and political influence over Europe. Cooperation between its Northern and Baltic fleets is therefore increasingly important to preserve its geostrategic interests, project power and to defend its territory. The Arctic states have to perform a delicate balancing act: they want to secure sea routes and resources but avoid spiralling escalation in the region. The dialogue on military security should be revived in order to con­tain the consequences of the security dilemma. Opportunities for cooperation do exist, for example on climate and environmental projects, sustainable and environmentally sound energy use, infrastructure, maritime safety and security as well as economic cooperation. (author's abstract)