Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change

The film The Day After Tomorrow depicts the abrupt and catastrophic transformation of the Earth’s climate into a new ice age, playing upon the uncertainty surrounding a possible North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (Gulf Stream) shutdown. This paper investigates the impact of the film on people’s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public Understanding of Science
Main Authors: Lowe, Thomas, Brown, Katrina, Dessai, Suraje, de França Doria, Miguel, Haynes, Kat, Vincent, Katharine
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22412
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224125
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796
id ftssoar:oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/22412
record_format openpolar
spelling ftssoar:oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/22412 2023-05-15T17:33:26+02:00 Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change Lowe, Thomas Brown, Katrina Dessai, Suraje de França Doria, Miguel Haynes, Kat Vincent, Katharine 2012-08-30T04:46:41Z http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22412 http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224125 https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796 unknown http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22412 http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224125 https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796 PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) Public Understanding of Science 15 4 435-457 journal article Zeitschriftenartikel 2012 ftssoar https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796 2022-12-13T21:58:20Z The film The Day After Tomorrow depicts the abrupt and catastrophic transformation of the Earth’s climate into a new ice age, playing upon the uncertainty surrounding a possible North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (Gulf Stream) shutdown. This paper investigates the impact of the film on people’s perception of climate change through a survey of filmgoers in the UK. Analysis focuses on four issues: the likelihood of extreme impacts; concern over climate change versus other global problems; motivation to take action; and responsibility for the problem of climate change. It finds that seeing the film, at least in the short term, changed people’s attitudes; viewers were significantly more concerned about climate change, and about other environmental risks. However, while the film increased anxiety about environmental risks, viewers experienced difficulty in distinguishing science fact from dramatized science fiction. Their belief in the likelihood of extreme events as a result of climate change was actually reduced. Following the film, many viewers expressed strong motivation to act on climate change. However, although the film may have sensitized viewers and motivated them to act, the public do not have information on what action they can take to mitigate climate change. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic North atlantic Thermohaline circulation SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository Public Understanding of Science 15 4 435 457
institution Open Polar
collection SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository
op_collection_id ftssoar
language unknown
description The film The Day After Tomorrow depicts the abrupt and catastrophic transformation of the Earth’s climate into a new ice age, playing upon the uncertainty surrounding a possible North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (Gulf Stream) shutdown. This paper investigates the impact of the film on people’s perception of climate change through a survey of filmgoers in the UK. Analysis focuses on four issues: the likelihood of extreme impacts; concern over climate change versus other global problems; motivation to take action; and responsibility for the problem of climate change. It finds that seeing the film, at least in the short term, changed people’s attitudes; viewers were significantly more concerned about climate change, and about other environmental risks. However, while the film increased anxiety about environmental risks, viewers experienced difficulty in distinguishing science fact from dramatized science fiction. Their belief in the likelihood of extreme events as a result of climate change was actually reduced. Following the film, many viewers expressed strong motivation to act on climate change. However, although the film may have sensitized viewers and motivated them to act, the public do not have information on what action they can take to mitigate climate change.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lowe, Thomas
Brown, Katrina
Dessai, Suraje
de França Doria, Miguel
Haynes, Kat
Vincent, Katharine
spellingShingle Lowe, Thomas
Brown, Katrina
Dessai, Suraje
de França Doria, Miguel
Haynes, Kat
Vincent, Katharine
Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change
author_facet Lowe, Thomas
Brown, Katrina
Dessai, Suraje
de França Doria, Miguel
Haynes, Kat
Vincent, Katharine
author_sort Lowe, Thomas
title Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change
title_short Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change
title_full Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change
title_fullStr Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change
title_full_unstemmed Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change
title_sort does tomorrow ever come? disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change
publishDate 2012
url http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22412
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224125
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796
genre North Atlantic
North atlantic Thermohaline circulation
genre_facet North Atlantic
North atlantic Thermohaline circulation
op_source Public Understanding of Science
15
4
435-457
op_relation http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22412
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224125
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796
op_rights PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506063796
container_title Public Understanding of Science
container_volume 15
container_issue 4
container_start_page 435
op_container_end_page 457
_version_ 1766131948028166144