Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range

Rock glaciers, a feature associated with at least discontinuous permafrost, provide important topoclimatic information. Active and inactive rock glaciers can be used to model current permafrost distribution. Relict rock glacier locations provide paleoclimatic information to infer past conditions. Fu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Main Author: Janke, Jason R.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: The Aquila Digital Community 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/2614
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1205
id ftsouthmissispun:oai:aquila.usm.edu:fac_pubs-3613
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthmissispun:oai:aquila.usm.edu:fac_pubs-3613 2023-07-30T04:06:12+02:00 Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range Janke, Jason R. 2005-11-01T08:00:00Z https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/2614 https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1205 unknown The Aquila Digital Community https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/2614 https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1205 Faculty Publications permafrost Front Range climate change rock glaciers Geography Social and Behavioral Sciences text 2005 ftsouthmissispun https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1205 2023-07-15T18:43:21Z Rock glaciers, a feature associated with at least discontinuous permafrost, provide important topoclimatic information. Active and inactive rock glaciers can be used to model current permafrost distribution. Relict rock glacier locations provide paleoclimatic information to infer past conditions. Future warmer climates could cause permafrost zones to shrink and initiate slope instability hazards such as debris flows or rockslides, thus modeling change remains imperative. This research examines potential past and future permafrost distribution in the Colorado Front Range by calibrating an existing permafrost model using a standard adiabatic rate for mountains (0·5 °C per 100 m) for a 4 °C range of cooler and warmer temperatures. According to the model, permafrost currently covers about 12 per cent (326·1 km2) of the entire study area (2721·5 km2). In a 4 °C cooler climate 73·7 per cent (2004·4 km2) of the study area could be covered by permafrost, whereas in a 4°C warmer climate almost no permafrost would be found. Permafrost would be reduced severely by 93·9 per cent (a loss of 306·2 km2) in a 2·0 °C warmer climate; however, permafrost will likely respond slowly to change. Relict rock glacier distribution indicates that mean annual air temperature (MAAT) was once at least some 3·0 to 4·0 °C cooler during the Pleistocene, with permafrost extending some 600–700 m lower than today. The model is effective at identifying temperature sensitive areas for future monitoring; however, other feedback mechanisms such as precipitation are neglected. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Text permafrost The University of Southern Mississippi: The Aquila Digital Community Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30 12 1495 1508
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Southern Mississippi: The Aquila Digital Community
op_collection_id ftsouthmissispun
language unknown
topic permafrost
Front Range
climate change
rock glaciers
Geography
Social and Behavioral Sciences
spellingShingle permafrost
Front Range
climate change
rock glaciers
Geography
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Janke, Jason R.
Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range
topic_facet permafrost
Front Range
climate change
rock glaciers
Geography
Social and Behavioral Sciences
description Rock glaciers, a feature associated with at least discontinuous permafrost, provide important topoclimatic information. Active and inactive rock glaciers can be used to model current permafrost distribution. Relict rock glacier locations provide paleoclimatic information to infer past conditions. Future warmer climates could cause permafrost zones to shrink and initiate slope instability hazards such as debris flows or rockslides, thus modeling change remains imperative. This research examines potential past and future permafrost distribution in the Colorado Front Range by calibrating an existing permafrost model using a standard adiabatic rate for mountains (0·5 °C per 100 m) for a 4 °C range of cooler and warmer temperatures. According to the model, permafrost currently covers about 12 per cent (326·1 km2) of the entire study area (2721·5 km2). In a 4 °C cooler climate 73·7 per cent (2004·4 km2) of the study area could be covered by permafrost, whereas in a 4°C warmer climate almost no permafrost would be found. Permafrost would be reduced severely by 93·9 per cent (a loss of 306·2 km2) in a 2·0 °C warmer climate; however, permafrost will likely respond slowly to change. Relict rock glacier distribution indicates that mean annual air temperature (MAAT) was once at least some 3·0 to 4·0 °C cooler during the Pleistocene, with permafrost extending some 600–700 m lower than today. The model is effective at identifying temperature sensitive areas for future monitoring; however, other feedback mechanisms such as precipitation are neglected. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Text
author Janke, Jason R.
author_facet Janke, Jason R.
author_sort Janke, Jason R.
title Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range
title_short Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range
title_full Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range
title_fullStr Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Past and Future Alpine Permafrost Distribution In the Colorado Front Range
title_sort modeling past and future alpine permafrost distribution in the colorado front range
publisher The Aquila Digital Community
publishDate 2005
url https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/2614
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1205
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_source Faculty Publications
op_relation https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/2614
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1205
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1205
container_title Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
container_volume 30
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1495
op_container_end_page 1508
_version_ 1772818665275654144