Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

North African dust is known to be deposited in the Gulf of Mexico, but its deposition rate and associated supply of lithogenic dissolved metals, such as the abiotic metal thorium or the micronutrient metal iron, have not been well-quantified. 232Th is an isotope with similar sources as iron and its...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hayes, Christopher T., Shiller, Alan M., Milroy, Scott P.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: The Aquila Digital Community 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/19836
https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1029/2022JC018523
id ftsouthmissispun:oai:aquila.usm.edu:fac_pubs-21163
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthmissispun:oai:aquila.usm.edu:fac_pubs-21163 2023-07-30T04:05:15+02:00 Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Hayes, Christopher T. Shiller, Alan M. Milroy, Scott P. 2022-04-01T07:00:00Z https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/19836 https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1029/2022JC018523 unknown The Aquila Digital Community https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/19836 https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1029/2022JC018523 Faculty Publications Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Physical Sciences and Mathematics text 2022 ftsouthmissispun 2023-07-15T18:56:39Z North African dust is known to be deposited in the Gulf of Mexico, but its deposition rate and associated supply of lithogenic dissolved metals, such as the abiotic metal thorium or the micronutrient metal iron, have not been well-quantified. 232Th is an isotope with similar sources as iron and its input can be quantified using radiogenic 230Th. By comparing dissolved 232Th fluxes at three sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico with upwind sites in the North Atlantic, we place an upper bound on North African dust contributions to 232Th and Fe in the Gulf of Mexico, which is about 30% of the total input. Precision on this bound is hindered by uncertainty in the relative rates of dust deposition in the North Atlantic and the northern Gulf of Mexico. Based on available radium data, shelf sources, including rivers, submarine groundwater discharge, and benthic sedimentary releases are likely as important if not more important than dust in the budget of lithogenic metals in the Gulf of Mexico. In other words, it is likely there is no one dominant source of Th and Fe in the Gulf of Mexico. Finally, our estimated Fe input in the northern Gulf of Mexico implies an Fe residence time of less than 6 months, similar to that in the North Atlantic despite significantly higher supply rates in the Gulf of Mexico. Text North Atlantic The University of Southern Mississippi: The Aquila Digital Community
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Southern Mississippi: The Aquila Digital Community
op_collection_id ftsouthmissispun
language unknown
topic Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
spellingShingle Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Hayes, Christopher T.
Shiller, Alan M.
Milroy, Scott P.
Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
topic_facet Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
description North African dust is known to be deposited in the Gulf of Mexico, but its deposition rate and associated supply of lithogenic dissolved metals, such as the abiotic metal thorium or the micronutrient metal iron, have not been well-quantified. 232Th is an isotope with similar sources as iron and its input can be quantified using radiogenic 230Th. By comparing dissolved 232Th fluxes at three sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico with upwind sites in the North Atlantic, we place an upper bound on North African dust contributions to 232Th and Fe in the Gulf of Mexico, which is about 30% of the total input. Precision on this bound is hindered by uncertainty in the relative rates of dust deposition in the North Atlantic and the northern Gulf of Mexico. Based on available radium data, shelf sources, including rivers, submarine groundwater discharge, and benthic sedimentary releases are likely as important if not more important than dust in the budget of lithogenic metals in the Gulf of Mexico. In other words, it is likely there is no one dominant source of Th and Fe in the Gulf of Mexico. Finally, our estimated Fe input in the northern Gulf of Mexico implies an Fe residence time of less than 6 months, similar to that in the North Atlantic despite significantly higher supply rates in the Gulf of Mexico.
format Text
author Hayes, Christopher T.
Shiller, Alan M.
Milroy, Scott P.
author_facet Hayes, Christopher T.
Shiller, Alan M.
Milroy, Scott P.
author_sort Hayes, Christopher T.
title Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
title_short Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
title_full Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
title_fullStr Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Towards Constraining Sources of Lithogenic Metals in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
title_sort towards constraining sources of lithogenic metals in the northern gulf of mexico
publisher The Aquila Digital Community
publishDate 2022
url https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/19836
https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1029/2022JC018523
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Faculty Publications
op_relation https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/19836
https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1029/2022JC018523
_version_ 1772817042139774976