Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation

Impulse waves in oceans, bays, lakes, or reservoirs are generated by landslides, rock falls, shore instabilities, snow avalanches, glacier calvings, or meteorite impacts. Examples are the 1958 Lituya Bay case in Alaska where the generated impulse wave reached a maximum run-up height of 524 m on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heller, Valentin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/74117/
http://wiki.manchester.ac.uk/spheric/index.php/Test7
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:74117
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:74117 2023-07-30T04:03:36+02:00 Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation Heller, Valentin 2009-11-16 https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/74117/ http://wiki.manchester.ac.uk/spheric/index.php/Test7 unknown Heller, Valentin (2009) Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation. Spheric. Article PeerReviewed 2009 ftsouthampton 2023-07-09T21:09:40Z Impulse waves in oceans, bays, lakes, or reservoirs are generated by landslides, rock falls, shore instabilities, snow avalanches, glacier calvings, or meteorite impacts. Examples are the 1958 Lituya Bay case in Alaska where the generated impulse wave reached a maximum run-up height of 524 m on the opposite shore or the 1963 Vaiont case in North Italy where an impulse wave overtopped a dam by about 70 m and killed 2,000 people. The mainly passive methods to face such catastrophes include evacuations, water level draw-down, or freeboard control in artificial reservoirs. They require detailed knowledge of the wave features and of the wave effects on the dam or shore line. Numerical methods such as SPH may play an important role in the future in predicting the effects of impulse waves since numerical models may result in more accurate predictions for complex geometries than general physical model studies at lower costs than specific physical case studies (Heller et al. 2009). This test case is one out of three experiments presented in Heller (2007), conducted in a wave channel with a still water depth h = 0.300 m. The results include the granular slide deformation prior and during impact into the water body, the wave generation including the temporal advance of velocity vector fields measured with Particle Image Velocimetry PIV, and the wave profiles measured with seven Capacitance Wave Gages CWGs. Article in Journal/Newspaper glacier Alaska University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language unknown
description Impulse waves in oceans, bays, lakes, or reservoirs are generated by landslides, rock falls, shore instabilities, snow avalanches, glacier calvings, or meteorite impacts. Examples are the 1958 Lituya Bay case in Alaska where the generated impulse wave reached a maximum run-up height of 524 m on the opposite shore or the 1963 Vaiont case in North Italy where an impulse wave overtopped a dam by about 70 m and killed 2,000 people. The mainly passive methods to face such catastrophes include evacuations, water level draw-down, or freeboard control in artificial reservoirs. They require detailed knowledge of the wave features and of the wave effects on the dam or shore line. Numerical methods such as SPH may play an important role in the future in predicting the effects of impulse waves since numerical models may result in more accurate predictions for complex geometries than general physical model studies at lower costs than specific physical case studies (Heller et al. 2009). This test case is one out of three experiments presented in Heller (2007), conducted in a wave channel with a still water depth h = 0.300 m. The results include the granular slide deformation prior and during impact into the water body, the wave generation including the temporal advance of velocity vector fields measured with Particle Image Velocimetry PIV, and the wave profiles measured with seven Capacitance Wave Gages CWGs.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Heller, Valentin
spellingShingle Heller, Valentin
Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation
author_facet Heller, Valentin
author_sort Heller, Valentin
title Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation
title_short Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation
title_full Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation
title_fullStr Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation
title_full_unstemmed Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation
title_sort test 7. subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental sph validation
publishDate 2009
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/74117/
http://wiki.manchester.ac.uk/spheric/index.php/Test7
genre glacier
Alaska
genre_facet glacier
Alaska
op_relation Heller, Valentin (2009) Test 7. Subaerial landslide generated impulse waves in a wave channel: experimental SPH validation. Spheric.
_version_ 1772814629090623488