Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report

During the James Cook Cruise 27 Autosub6000 aborted mission 12 due to a failure in the position feedback potentiometer of the stern plane actuator. The same actuator is used on Autosub3 which is heading to the Pine Island glacier in Antarctica in January 2009. A similar failure of the Autosub3 actua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Furlong, M.E., Brito, M.P.
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: National Oceanography Centre 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/1/NOCS_R%2526C_58.pdf
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:66320
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:66320 2024-05-12T07:53:56+00:00 Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report Furlong, M.E. Brito, M.P. 2009 text https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/ https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/1/NOCS_R%2526C_58.pdf en eng National Oceanography Centre https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/1/NOCS_R%2526C_58.pdf Furlong, M.E. and Brito, M.P. (2009) Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report (National Oceanography Centre Southampton Research and Consultancy Report, 58) Southampton, UK. National Oceanography Centre 30pp. Monograph NonPeerReviewed 2009 ftsouthampton 2024-04-17T14:05:16Z During the James Cook Cruise 27 Autosub6000 aborted mission 12 due to a failure in the position feedback potentiometer of the stern plane actuator. The same actuator is used on Autosub3 which is heading to the Pine Island glacier in Antarctica in January 2009. A similar failure of the Autosub3 actuator while under the ice would result in the loss of the AUV. This report initially describes the investigation into the failure of the feedback potentiometer and shows that the potentiometer’s conductive plastic track became detached from its ceramic substrate and broke up. The report then describes the testing performed to evaluate the reliability of the potentiometer. This involved an accelerated aging test to simulate the worst case conditions seen by the potentiometer in the actuator. This was achieved by oscillating the potentiometer at 4Hz to simulate the actuator movements whilst cycling the pressure of the Morlina 10 oil surrounding the potentiometers. During the testing the 10k? potentiometers used in the actuator were not available, and so 5k? potentiometers from the same range were tested as a substitute. It was assumed that these 5k? potentiometers would produce similar results, however it was found during the testing that the formulation of the 5k? potentiometer track was different from the 10k?; whether this affects the reliability is not known. Due to the large amount of time required to perform each test only 16 5k? potentiometers were tested. Although no failures occurred, the sample was too small to give a high statistical confidence that the potentiometers would survive the cruise. To further reduce the risk four 5k? potentiometers that were to be used on Autosub3 were tested for approximately 72 hours in a ‘burnt in’ process. As an early failure similar to that of Autosub6000 potentiometer would have been detected during this process, the chance of the potentiometers failing was significantly reduced. Thus the burnt in potentiometers were considered acceptable for use on Autosub 3 during the Pine ... Book Antarc* Antarctica Pine Island Pine Island Glacier University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Pine Island Glacier ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language English
description During the James Cook Cruise 27 Autosub6000 aborted mission 12 due to a failure in the position feedback potentiometer of the stern plane actuator. The same actuator is used on Autosub3 which is heading to the Pine Island glacier in Antarctica in January 2009. A similar failure of the Autosub3 actuator while under the ice would result in the loss of the AUV. This report initially describes the investigation into the failure of the feedback potentiometer and shows that the potentiometer’s conductive plastic track became detached from its ceramic substrate and broke up. The report then describes the testing performed to evaluate the reliability of the potentiometer. This involved an accelerated aging test to simulate the worst case conditions seen by the potentiometer in the actuator. This was achieved by oscillating the potentiometer at 4Hz to simulate the actuator movements whilst cycling the pressure of the Morlina 10 oil surrounding the potentiometers. During the testing the 10k? potentiometers used in the actuator were not available, and so 5k? potentiometers from the same range were tested as a substitute. It was assumed that these 5k? potentiometers would produce similar results, however it was found during the testing that the formulation of the 5k? potentiometer track was different from the 10k?; whether this affects the reliability is not known. Due to the large amount of time required to perform each test only 16 5k? potentiometers were tested. Although no failures occurred, the sample was too small to give a high statistical confidence that the potentiometers would survive the cruise. To further reduce the risk four 5k? potentiometers that were to be used on Autosub3 were tested for approximately 72 hours in a ‘burnt in’ process. As an early failure similar to that of Autosub6000 potentiometer would have been detected during this process, the chance of the potentiometers failing was significantly reduced. Thus the burnt in potentiometers were considered acceptable for use on Autosub 3 during the Pine ...
format Book
author Furlong, M.E.
Brito, M.P.
spellingShingle Furlong, M.E.
Brito, M.P.
Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
author_facet Furlong, M.E.
Brito, M.P.
author_sort Furlong, M.E.
title Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
title_short Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
title_full Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
title_fullStr Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
title_full_unstemmed Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
title_sort reliability case notes no. 4: autosub6000 and autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
publisher National Oceanography Centre
publishDate 2009
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/1/NOCS_R%2526C_58.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000)
geographic Pine Island Glacier
geographic_facet Pine Island Glacier
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
op_relation https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/66320/1/NOCS_R%2526C_58.pdf
Furlong, M.E. and Brito, M.P. (2009) Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report (National Oceanography Centre Southampton Research and Consultancy Report, 58) Southampton, UK. National Oceanography Centre 30pp.
_version_ 1798845626074529792