Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets

Results from an analysis of the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC) global wind stress climatology, which is based on in situ reports for the period 1980-93, are presented. The accuracy of the SOC stresses has been assessed at several locations by comparison of individual monthly means with measur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josey, Simon A., Kent, Elizabeth C., Taylor, Peter K.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/6160/
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:6160
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:6160 2023-07-30T04:05:19+02:00 Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets Josey, Simon A. Kent, Elizabeth C. Taylor, Peter K. 2002 https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/6160/ unknown Josey, Simon A., Kent, Elizabeth C. and Taylor, Peter K. (2002) Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 32 (7), 1993-2019. (doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1993:WSFOTO>2.0.CO;2 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1993:WSFOTO>2.0.CO;2>). Article PeerReviewed 2002 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1993:WSFOTO>2.0.CO;2 2023-07-09T20:29:13Z Results from an analysis of the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC) global wind stress climatology, which is based on in situ reports for the period 1980-93, are presented. The accuracy of the SOC stresses has been assessed at several locations by comparison of individual monthly means with measurements from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution research buoy deployments. For the subduction buoy array, situated in the subtropical North Atlantic, the random error in the SOC individual monthly mean wind stress ranges from 0.004 to 0.008 N m-2, which corresponds to between 5% and 10% of the mean stress depending on which buoy is considered. The large-scale characteristics of the SOC fields are compared with those of the NCEP-NCAR and ECMWF atmospheric model reanalyses, and the in situ observation based on the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee/Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Dataset (UWM/COADS) and Hellerman and Rosenstein (HR) climatologies. The NCEP-NCAR fields show noticeably weaker wind stress forcing in the Tropics than SOC, while ECMWF and UWM/COADS are in good agreement. From the Tropics to the midlatitudes, the HR stresses tend to be stronger than SOC and the other recent climatologies. At higher latitudes, differences in the spatial structure of the Northern Hemisphere subpolar gyres in SOC and HR are found that are consistent with variations in the state of the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oscillations within the periods on which the climatologies are based. A detailed comparison of the wind-driven response of the ocean is presented for SOC and HR. The North Atlantic subpolar gyre is more intense in SOC than HR and this leads to a doubling in the strength of the Ekman suction. January mean upwelling velocities in this region deduced from the two datasets are 18.9 and 8.6 m month-1, respectively. In the North Pacific a single large-scale subpolar gyre is evident in SOC compared with two smaller gyres in HR. Seasonal to interannual variability in the wind-driven ocean response is quantified using an ... Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language unknown
description Results from an analysis of the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC) global wind stress climatology, which is based on in situ reports for the period 1980-93, are presented. The accuracy of the SOC stresses has been assessed at several locations by comparison of individual monthly means with measurements from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution research buoy deployments. For the subduction buoy array, situated in the subtropical North Atlantic, the random error in the SOC individual monthly mean wind stress ranges from 0.004 to 0.008 N m-2, which corresponds to between 5% and 10% of the mean stress depending on which buoy is considered. The large-scale characteristics of the SOC fields are compared with those of the NCEP-NCAR and ECMWF atmospheric model reanalyses, and the in situ observation based on the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee/Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Dataset (UWM/COADS) and Hellerman and Rosenstein (HR) climatologies. The NCEP-NCAR fields show noticeably weaker wind stress forcing in the Tropics than SOC, while ECMWF and UWM/COADS are in good agreement. From the Tropics to the midlatitudes, the HR stresses tend to be stronger than SOC and the other recent climatologies. At higher latitudes, differences in the spatial structure of the Northern Hemisphere subpolar gyres in SOC and HR are found that are consistent with variations in the state of the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oscillations within the periods on which the climatologies are based. A detailed comparison of the wind-driven response of the ocean is presented for SOC and HR. The North Atlantic subpolar gyre is more intense in SOC than HR and this leads to a doubling in the strength of the Ekman suction. January mean upwelling velocities in this region deduced from the two datasets are 18.9 and 8.6 m month-1, respectively. In the North Pacific a single large-scale subpolar gyre is evident in SOC compared with two smaller gyres in HR. Seasonal to interannual variability in the wind-driven ocean response is quantified using an ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Josey, Simon A.
Kent, Elizabeth C.
Taylor, Peter K.
spellingShingle Josey, Simon A.
Kent, Elizabeth C.
Taylor, Peter K.
Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets
author_facet Josey, Simon A.
Kent, Elizabeth C.
Taylor, Peter K.
author_sort Josey, Simon A.
title Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets
title_short Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets
title_full Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets
title_fullStr Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets
title_full_unstemmed Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets
title_sort wind stress forcing of the ocean in the soc climatology: comparisons with the ncep-ncar, ecmwf, uwm/coads, and hellerman and rosenstein datasets
publishDate 2002
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/6160/
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation Josey, Simon A., Kent, Elizabeth C. and Taylor, Peter K. (2002) Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 32 (7), 1993-2019. (doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1993:WSFOTO>2.0.CO;2 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1993:WSFOTO>2.0.CO;2>).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1993:WSFOTO>2.0.CO;2
_version_ 1772817137178509312