Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales

Steric height (SH) variability computed from Argo profiling buoys data for the North Atlantic and period 1999–2006 is analyzed and compared to the variability computed from the satellite altimetry data. It is demonstrated that although the contribution from halosteric contraction is smaller than tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research
Main Authors: Ivchenko, V.O., Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Schroeter, J., Wenzel, M., Aleynik, D.L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/58336/
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2008/2008JC004836.shtml
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:58336
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:58336 2023-08-27T04:10:48+02:00 Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales Ivchenko, V.O. Danilov, S. Sidorenko, D. Schroeter, J. Wenzel, M. Aleynik, D.L. 2008-11-05 https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/58336/ http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2008/2008JC004836.shtml unknown Ivchenko, V.O., Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Schroeter, J., Wenzel, M. and Aleynik, D.L. (2008) Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113 (C11), C11007. (doi:10.1029/2008JC004836 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004836>). Article PeerReviewed 2008 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004836 2023-08-03T22:19:13Z Steric height (SH) variability computed from Argo profiling buoys data for the North Atlantic and period 1999–2006 is analyzed and compared to the variability computed from the satellite altimetry data. It is demonstrated that although the contribution from halosteric contraction is smaller than that from the thermal expansion, it is not negligible in wide areas in the North Atlantic and cannot be discarded (the regression of trends in full steric and thermosteric heights is 0.73). It is found that the SH variability is not really sensitive to increasing the reference level from 1000 to 1500 m. Differences in trend reach several mm/year locally, which is estimated to be below sampling errors (about 1.4 mm/year). The SH trends are between ±1 cm/year locally. The comparison of SH and altimetric height variability shows qualitative agreement of both for the amplitude of the annual harmonics and trend but reveals significant local differences which cannot be explained by bottom pressure variability. The main modes of variability seen in yearly mean patterns of SH and satellite altimetry are also different. It is suggested that sampling/interpolation errors are still too high to reveal a balance between the SH and altimetric height variability at the local level. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Journal of Geophysical Research 113 C11
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language unknown
description Steric height (SH) variability computed from Argo profiling buoys data for the North Atlantic and period 1999–2006 is analyzed and compared to the variability computed from the satellite altimetry data. It is demonstrated that although the contribution from halosteric contraction is smaller than that from the thermal expansion, it is not negligible in wide areas in the North Atlantic and cannot be discarded (the regression of trends in full steric and thermosteric heights is 0.73). It is found that the SH variability is not really sensitive to increasing the reference level from 1000 to 1500 m. Differences in trend reach several mm/year locally, which is estimated to be below sampling errors (about 1.4 mm/year). The SH trends are between ±1 cm/year locally. The comparison of SH and altimetric height variability shows qualitative agreement of both for the amplitude of the annual harmonics and trend but reveals significant local differences which cannot be explained by bottom pressure variability. The main modes of variability seen in yearly mean patterns of SH and satellite altimetry are also different. It is suggested that sampling/interpolation errors are still too high to reveal a balance between the SH and altimetric height variability at the local level.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ivchenko, V.O.
Danilov, S.
Sidorenko, D.
Schroeter, J.
Wenzel, M.
Aleynik, D.L.
spellingShingle Ivchenko, V.O.
Danilov, S.
Sidorenko, D.
Schroeter, J.
Wenzel, M.
Aleynik, D.L.
Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales
author_facet Ivchenko, V.O.
Danilov, S.
Sidorenko, D.
Schroeter, J.
Wenzel, M.
Aleynik, D.L.
author_sort Ivchenko, V.O.
title Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales
title_short Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales
title_full Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales
title_fullStr Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales
title_full_unstemmed Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales
title_sort steric height variability in the northern atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales
publishDate 2008
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/58336/
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2008/2008JC004836.shtml
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation Ivchenko, V.O., Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Schroeter, J., Wenzel, M. and Aleynik, D.L. (2008) Steric height variability in the northern Atlantic on seasonal and interannual scales. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113 (C11), C11007. (doi:10.1029/2008JC004836 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004836>).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004836
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research
container_volume 113
container_issue C11
_version_ 1775353117023404032