Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods

As offshore renewable energy projects progress from concept demonstration to commercial-scale developments there is a need for improved approaches beyond conventional cable engineering design methods that have evolved from larger diameter pipelines for the oil and gas industry. New approaches are ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Volume 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems
Main Authors: Draper, Scott, Tong, Feifei, Fogliani, Antonino, White, David, Johnson, Fraser, Coles, Daniel, Ingham, Stephen, Lourie, Caroline
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/1/13_Griffiths_et_al_2018_OMAE2018_77130_002_.pdf
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:422785
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:422785 2023-07-30T04:00:00+02:00 Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods Draper, Scott Tong, Feifei Fogliani, Antonino White, David Johnson, Fraser Coles, Daniel Ingham, Stephen Lourie, Caroline 2018 text https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/ https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/1/13_Griffiths_et_al_2018_OMAE2018_77130_002_.pdf en English eng American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/1/13_Griffiths_et_al_2018_OMAE2018_77130_002_.pdf Draper, Scott, Tong, Feifei, Fogliani, Antonino, White, David, Johnson, Fraser, Coles, Daniel, Ingham, Stephen and Lourie, Caroline (2018) Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods. In Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. vol. 5, American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). V005T04A043 . (doi:10.1115/OMAE2018-77130 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77130>). Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed 2018 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77130 2023-07-09T22:24:04Z As offshore renewable energy projects progress from concept demonstration to commercial-scale developments there is a need for improved approaches beyond conventional cable engineering design methods that have evolved from larger diameter pipelines for the oil and gas industry. New approaches are needed to capture the relevant physics for small diameter cables on rocky seabeds to reduce the costs and risks of power transmission and increase operational reliability. This paper reports on subsea cables that MeyGen installed for Phase 1a of the Pentland Firth Inner Sound tidal stream energy project. These cables are located on rocky seabeds in an area where severe metocean conditions occur. ROV field observation of these cables shows them to be stable on the seabed with little or no movement occurring over almost all of the cable routes, despite conventional engineering methods predicting significant dynamic movement. We cite recent research undertaken by the University of Western Australia (UWA) to more accurately assess the hydrodynamic forces and geotechnical interaction of cables on rocky seabeds. We quantify the conformity between the cables and the undulating rocky seabed, and the distributions of cable seabed contact and spanning via simulations of the centimetric scale seabed bathymetry. This analysis leads to calculated profiles of lift, drag and seabed friction along the cable, which show that all of these load and reaction components are modelled in an over-conservative way by conventional pipeline engineering techniques. Overall, our analysis highlights that current cable stability design can be unnecessarily conservative on rocky seabeds. Our work foreshadows a new design approach that offers more efficient cable design to reduce project capex and enhance through-life integrity management. Conference Object Arctic University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Volume 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language English
description As offshore renewable energy projects progress from concept demonstration to commercial-scale developments there is a need for improved approaches beyond conventional cable engineering design methods that have evolved from larger diameter pipelines for the oil and gas industry. New approaches are needed to capture the relevant physics for small diameter cables on rocky seabeds to reduce the costs and risks of power transmission and increase operational reliability. This paper reports on subsea cables that MeyGen installed for Phase 1a of the Pentland Firth Inner Sound tidal stream energy project. These cables are located on rocky seabeds in an area where severe metocean conditions occur. ROV field observation of these cables shows them to be stable on the seabed with little or no movement occurring over almost all of the cable routes, despite conventional engineering methods predicting significant dynamic movement. We cite recent research undertaken by the University of Western Australia (UWA) to more accurately assess the hydrodynamic forces and geotechnical interaction of cables on rocky seabeds. We quantify the conformity between the cables and the undulating rocky seabed, and the distributions of cable seabed contact and spanning via simulations of the centimetric scale seabed bathymetry. This analysis leads to calculated profiles of lift, drag and seabed friction along the cable, which show that all of these load and reaction components are modelled in an over-conservative way by conventional pipeline engineering techniques. Overall, our analysis highlights that current cable stability design can be unnecessarily conservative on rocky seabeds. Our work foreshadows a new design approach that offers more efficient cable design to reduce project capex and enhance through-life integrity management.
format Conference Object
author Draper, Scott
Tong, Feifei
Fogliani, Antonino
White, David
Johnson, Fraser
Coles, Daniel
Ingham, Stephen
Lourie, Caroline
spellingShingle Draper, Scott
Tong, Feifei
Fogliani, Antonino
White, David
Johnson, Fraser
Coles, Daniel
Ingham, Stephen
Lourie, Caroline
Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods
author_facet Draper, Scott
Tong, Feifei
Fogliani, Antonino
White, David
Johnson, Fraser
Coles, Daniel
Ingham, Stephen
Lourie, Caroline
author_sort Draper, Scott
title Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods
title_short Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods
title_full Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods
title_fullStr Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods
title_full_unstemmed Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods
title_sort subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods
publisher American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
publishDate 2018
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/1/13_Griffiths_et_al_2018_OMAE2018_77130_002_.pdf
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/422785/1/13_Griffiths_et_al_2018_OMAE2018_77130_002_.pdf
Draper, Scott, Tong, Feifei, Fogliani, Antonino, White, David, Johnson, Fraser, Coles, Daniel, Ingham, Stephen and Lourie, Caroline (2018) Subsea cable stability on rocky seabeds - Comparison of field observations against conventional and novel design methods. In Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. vol. 5, American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). V005T04A043 . (doi:10.1115/OMAE2018-77130 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77130>).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77130
container_title Volume 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems
_version_ 1772810663228342272