The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river

There has been an increase in the abundance of small hydropower (< 10 MW) installations. These tend to be ‘run-of-river’, thereby reducing or averting the need for impoundment and water storage, and so are considered to have lower environmental impact. The Archimedes screw turbine (AST) has been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Engineering
Main Authors: Piper, A.T., Rosewarne, P.J., Wright, R.M., Kemp, P.S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/1/Piper_et_al_2018_Low_head_hydropower_2018_Acceptedv2.docx
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/2/Piper_et_al._2018_Archimedes_Screw.pdf
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:420119
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:420119 2023-07-30T03:56:15+02:00 The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river Piper, A.T. Rosewarne, P.J. Wright, R.M. Kemp, P.S. 2018-08-01 text https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/ https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/1/Piper_et_al_2018_Low_head_hydropower_2018_Acceptedv2.docx https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/2/Piper_et_al._2018_Archimedes_Screw.pdf en English eng https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/1/Piper_et_al_2018_Low_head_hydropower_2018_Acceptedv2.docx https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/2/Piper_et_al._2018_Archimedes_Screw.pdf Piper, A.T., Rosewarne, P.J., Wright, R.M. and Kemp, P.S. (2018) The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river. Ecological Engineering, 118, 31-42. (doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.009 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.009>). cc_by_nc_nd_4 Article PeerReviewed 2018 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.009 2023-07-09T22:22:08Z There has been an increase in the abundance of small hydropower (< 10 MW) installations. These tend to be ‘run-of-river’, thereby reducing or averting the need for impoundment and water storage, and so are considered to have lower environmental impact. The Archimedes screw turbine (AST) has been described as ‘fish friendly’ based on magnitude of observed first order impacts, i.e. low rates of direct damage and mortality due to blade strike. However, potential second order effects, such as altered fish behaviour prior to or after passage, and consequences for long-term survival and fitness, have been largely ignored. This two-year study employed acoustic and Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) telemetry and dual frequency imaging sonar to investigate the influence of an AST and associated fish passes (Larinier super-active baffle pass and upstream eel ladders) on the movement patterns and behaviour of five species of potadromous fish and European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Seaward-migrating adult (silver) eels successfully descended the AST, but under high flows most individuals took an alternative route via an overshot weir which resulted in faster passage rates. There was no immediate silver eel mortality as a result of passage through the turbine and no effect on subsequent migration behaviour through the lower freshwater catchment and estuary. Some eels were delayed at the complex and exhibited frequent rejection and milling on their approach to the AST and fish passes. Upstream passage rate (%) at the Larinier pass varied among species with highest for dace (81%) and the lowest for roach (10%). Fish that aggregated up- and downstream of the AST rapidly dispersed on turbine start-up. Although ASTs can be considered a potential downstream passage route for both eels and potadromous species, adult eels milled and rejected at the upstream entrance, while other fish exhibited startle response on turbine start-up. Potential delay to seaward migration of silver eel and the energetic costs of observed behaviours ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Anguilla anguilla European eel University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Baffle ENVELOPE(-67.083,-67.083,-68.200,-68.200) Weir ENVELOPE(177.167,177.167,-84.983,-84.983) Ecological Engineering 118 31 42
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language English
description There has been an increase in the abundance of small hydropower (< 10 MW) installations. These tend to be ‘run-of-river’, thereby reducing or averting the need for impoundment and water storage, and so are considered to have lower environmental impact. The Archimedes screw turbine (AST) has been described as ‘fish friendly’ based on magnitude of observed first order impacts, i.e. low rates of direct damage and mortality due to blade strike. However, potential second order effects, such as altered fish behaviour prior to or after passage, and consequences for long-term survival and fitness, have been largely ignored. This two-year study employed acoustic and Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) telemetry and dual frequency imaging sonar to investigate the influence of an AST and associated fish passes (Larinier super-active baffle pass and upstream eel ladders) on the movement patterns and behaviour of five species of potadromous fish and European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Seaward-migrating adult (silver) eels successfully descended the AST, but under high flows most individuals took an alternative route via an overshot weir which resulted in faster passage rates. There was no immediate silver eel mortality as a result of passage through the turbine and no effect on subsequent migration behaviour through the lower freshwater catchment and estuary. Some eels were delayed at the complex and exhibited frequent rejection and milling on their approach to the AST and fish passes. Upstream passage rate (%) at the Larinier pass varied among species with highest for dace (81%) and the lowest for roach (10%). Fish that aggregated up- and downstream of the AST rapidly dispersed on turbine start-up. Although ASTs can be considered a potential downstream passage route for both eels and potadromous species, adult eels milled and rejected at the upstream entrance, while other fish exhibited startle response on turbine start-up. Potential delay to seaward migration of silver eel and the energetic costs of observed behaviours ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Piper, A.T.
Rosewarne, P.J.
Wright, R.M.
Kemp, P.S.
spellingShingle Piper, A.T.
Rosewarne, P.J.
Wright, R.M.
Kemp, P.S.
The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river
author_facet Piper, A.T.
Rosewarne, P.J.
Wright, R.M.
Kemp, P.S.
author_sort Piper, A.T.
title The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river
title_short The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river
title_full The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river
title_fullStr The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river
title_full_unstemmed The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river
title_sort impact of an archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river
publishDate 2018
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/1/Piper_et_al_2018_Low_head_hydropower_2018_Acceptedv2.docx
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/2/Piper_et_al._2018_Archimedes_Screw.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-67.083,-67.083,-68.200,-68.200)
ENVELOPE(177.167,177.167,-84.983,-84.983)
geographic Baffle
Weir
geographic_facet Baffle
Weir
genre Anguilla anguilla
European eel
genre_facet Anguilla anguilla
European eel
op_relation https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/1/Piper_et_al_2018_Low_head_hydropower_2018_Acceptedv2.docx
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/420119/2/Piper_et_al._2018_Archimedes_Screw.pdf
Piper, A.T., Rosewarne, P.J., Wright, R.M. and Kemp, P.S. (2018) The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river. Ecological Engineering, 118, 31-42. (doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.009 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.009>).
op_rights cc_by_nc_nd_4
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.009
container_title Ecological Engineering
container_volume 118
container_start_page 31
op_container_end_page 42
_version_ 1772812446000480256