Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project

Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remediation Journal
Main Authors: Cundy, Andy, Bardos, Paul, Puschenreiter, Markus, Witters, Nele, Mench, Michel, Bert, Valerie, Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang, Müller, Ingo, Weyens, Nele, Vangronsveld, Jaco
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/1/Cundy%2520et%2520al%25202015%2520Remediation%2520journal%2520paper%2520preprint.pdf
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:399267
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:399267 2023-07-30T04:03:51+02:00 Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project Cundy, Andy Bardos, Paul Puschenreiter, Markus Witters, Nele Mench, Michel Bert, Valerie Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang Müller, Ingo Weyens, Nele Vangronsveld, Jaco 2015-06-10 text https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/ https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/1/Cundy%2520et%2520al%25202015%2520Remediation%2520journal%2520paper%2520preprint.pdf en English eng https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/1/Cundy%2520et%2520al%25202015%2520Remediation%2520journal%2520paper%2520preprint.pdf Cundy, Andy, Bardos, Paul, Puschenreiter, Markus, Witters, Nele, Mench, Michel, Bert, Valerie, Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang, Müller, Ingo, Weyens, Nele and Vangronsveld, Jaco (2015) Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project. Remediation Journal, 25 (3), 101-114. (doi:10.1002/rem.21435 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435>). Article PeerReviewed 2015 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 2023-07-09T22:10:01Z Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decision-making and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Greenland Remediation Journal 25 3 101 114
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language English
description Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decision-making and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cundy, Andy
Bardos, Paul
Puschenreiter, Markus
Witters, Nele
Mench, Michel
Bert, Valerie
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Müller, Ingo
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
spellingShingle Cundy, Andy
Bardos, Paul
Puschenreiter, Markus
Witters, Nele
Mench, Michel
Bert, Valerie
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Müller, Ingo
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
author_facet Cundy, Andy
Bardos, Paul
Puschenreiter, Markus
Witters, Nele
Mench, Michel
Bert, Valerie
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Müller, Ingo
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
author_sort Cundy, Andy
title Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_short Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_full Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_fullStr Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_full_unstemmed Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_sort developing effective decision support for the application of “gentle” remediation options: the greenland project
publishDate 2015
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/1/Cundy%2520et%2520al%25202015%2520Remediation%2520journal%2520paper%2520preprint.pdf
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/399267/1/Cundy%2520et%2520al%25202015%2520Remediation%2520journal%2520paper%2520preprint.pdf
Cundy, Andy, Bardos, Paul, Puschenreiter, Markus, Witters, Nele, Mench, Michel, Bert, Valerie, Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang, Müller, Ingo, Weyens, Nele and Vangronsveld, Jaco (2015) Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project. Remediation Journal, 25 (3), 101-114. (doi:10.1002/rem.21435 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435>).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
container_title Remediation Journal
container_volume 25
container_issue 3
container_start_page 101
op_container_end_page 114
_version_ 1772814979464953856