Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments

Deep-sea sediments cover ~70% of Earth's surface and represent the largest interface between the biological and geological cycles of carbon. Diatoms and zooplankton faecal pellets naturally transport organic material from the upper ocean down to the deep seabed, but how these qualitatively diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The ISME Journal
Main Authors: Mayor, Daniel J., Thornton, Barry, Hay, Steve, Zuur, Alain F., Nicol, Graeme W., McWilliam, Jenna M., Witte, Ursula F.M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/380724/
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:380724
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:380724 2023-07-30T04:05:46+02:00 Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments Mayor, Daniel J. Thornton, Barry Hay, Steve Zuur, Alain F. Nicol, Graeme W. McWilliam, Jenna M. Witte, Ursula F.M. 2012 https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/380724/ English eng Mayor, Daniel J., Thornton, Barry, Hay, Steve, Zuur, Alain F., Nicol, Graeme W., McWilliam, Jenna M. and Witte, Ursula F.M. (2012) Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments. The ISME Journal, 6 (9), 1740-1748. (doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.14 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.14>). Article PeerReviewed 2012 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.14 2023-07-09T22:01:04Z Deep-sea sediments cover ~70% of Earth's surface and represent the largest interface between the biological and geological cycles of carbon. Diatoms and zooplankton faecal pellets naturally transport organic material from the upper ocean down to the deep seabed, but how these qualitatively different substrates affect the fate of carbon in this permanently cold environment remains unknown. We added equal quantities of 13C-labelled diatoms and faecal pellets to a cold water (?0.7?°C) sediment community retrieved from 1080?m in the Faroe-Shetland Channel, Northeast Atlantic, and quantified carbon mineralization and uptake by the resident bacteria and macrofauna over a 6-day period. High-quality, diatom-derived carbon was mineralized >300% faster than that from low-quality faecal pellets, demonstrating that qualitative differences in organic matter drive major changes in the residence time of carbon at the deep seabed. Benthic bacteria dominated biological carbon processing in our experiments, yet showed no evidence of resource quality-limited growth; they displayed lower growth efficiencies when respiring diatoms. These effects were consistent in contrasting months. We contend that respiration and growth in the resident sediment microbial communities were substrate and temperature limited, respectively. Our study has important implications for how future changes in the biochemical makeup of exported organic matter will affect the balance between mineralization and sequestration of organic carbon in the largest ecosystem on Earth. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northeast Atlantic University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton The ISME Journal 6 9 1740 1748
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language English
description Deep-sea sediments cover ~70% of Earth's surface and represent the largest interface between the biological and geological cycles of carbon. Diatoms and zooplankton faecal pellets naturally transport organic material from the upper ocean down to the deep seabed, but how these qualitatively different substrates affect the fate of carbon in this permanently cold environment remains unknown. We added equal quantities of 13C-labelled diatoms and faecal pellets to a cold water (?0.7?°C) sediment community retrieved from 1080?m in the Faroe-Shetland Channel, Northeast Atlantic, and quantified carbon mineralization and uptake by the resident bacteria and macrofauna over a 6-day period. High-quality, diatom-derived carbon was mineralized >300% faster than that from low-quality faecal pellets, demonstrating that qualitative differences in organic matter drive major changes in the residence time of carbon at the deep seabed. Benthic bacteria dominated biological carbon processing in our experiments, yet showed no evidence of resource quality-limited growth; they displayed lower growth efficiencies when respiring diatoms. These effects were consistent in contrasting months. We contend that respiration and growth in the resident sediment microbial communities were substrate and temperature limited, respectively. Our study has important implications for how future changes in the biochemical makeup of exported organic matter will affect the balance between mineralization and sequestration of organic carbon in the largest ecosystem on Earth.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mayor, Daniel J.
Thornton, Barry
Hay, Steve
Zuur, Alain F.
Nicol, Graeme W.
McWilliam, Jenna M.
Witte, Ursula F.M.
spellingShingle Mayor, Daniel J.
Thornton, Barry
Hay, Steve
Zuur, Alain F.
Nicol, Graeme W.
McWilliam, Jenna M.
Witte, Ursula F.M.
Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments
author_facet Mayor, Daniel J.
Thornton, Barry
Hay, Steve
Zuur, Alain F.
Nicol, Graeme W.
McWilliam, Jenna M.
Witte, Ursula F.M.
author_sort Mayor, Daniel J.
title Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments
title_short Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments
title_full Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments
title_fullStr Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments
title_full_unstemmed Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments
title_sort resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments
publishDate 2012
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/380724/
genre Northeast Atlantic
genre_facet Northeast Atlantic
op_relation Mayor, Daniel J., Thornton, Barry, Hay, Steve, Zuur, Alain F., Nicol, Graeme W., McWilliam, Jenna M. and Witte, Ursula F.M. (2012) Resource quality affects carbon cycling in deep-sea sediments. The ISME Journal, 6 (9), 1740-1748. (doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.14 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.14>).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.14
container_title The ISME Journal
container_volume 6
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1740
op_container_end_page 1748
_version_ 1772817923431202816