Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions

Using projections from two coupled climate models (HadCM3C and HadGEM2-AO), we consider the effect on 21st century sea-level rise (SLR) of mitigation policies relative to a scenario of business-as-usual (BAU). Around a third of the global-mean SLR over the century is avoided by a mitigation scenario...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Pardaens, A.K., Lowe, J.A, Brown, S., Nicholls, R.J., de Gusmão, D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/1/2011GL047678.pdf
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:197915
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:197915 2023-07-30T04:04:13+02:00 Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions Pardaens, A.K. Lowe, J.A Brown, S. Nicholls, R.J. de Gusmão, D. 2011-06-23 text https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/ https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/1/2011GL047678.pdf en eng https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/1/2011GL047678.pdf Pardaens, A.K., Lowe, J.A, Brown, S., Nicholls, R.J. and de Gusmão, D. (2011) Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions. Geophysical Research Letters, 38 (12), L12604-[5]. (doi:10.1029/2011GL047678 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047678>). Article PeerReviewed 2011 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047678 2023-07-09T21:23:43Z Using projections from two coupled climate models (HadCM3C and HadGEM2-AO), we consider the effect on 21st century sea-level rise (SLR) of mitigation policies relative to a scenario of business-as-usual (BAU). Around a third of the global-mean SLR over the century is avoided by a mitigation scenario under which global-mean near surface air temperature stabilises close to the Copenhagen Accord limit of a 2°C increase. Under BAU (a variant of the A1B scenario) the model-averaged projected SLR for 2090–2099 relative to 1980–1999 is 0.29 m–0.51 m (5%–95% uncertainties from treatment of land-based ice melt); under mitigation (E1 scenario) it is 0.17 m–0.34 m. This reduction is primarily from reduced thermal expansion. The spatial patterns of regional SLR are fairly dissimilar between the models, but are qualitatively similar across scenarios for a particular model. An impacts model suggests that by the end of the 21st century and without upgrade in defences around 55% of the 84 million additional people flooded per year globally under BAU (from SLR alone) could be avoided under such mitigation. The above projections of SLR follow the methodology of the IPCC Fourth Assessment. We have, however, also conducted a sensitivity study of SLR and its impacts where the possibility of accelerated ice sheet dynamics is accounted for Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice Sheet University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Geophysical Research Letters 38 12 n/a n/a
institution Open Polar
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
language English
description Using projections from two coupled climate models (HadCM3C and HadGEM2-AO), we consider the effect on 21st century sea-level rise (SLR) of mitigation policies relative to a scenario of business-as-usual (BAU). Around a third of the global-mean SLR over the century is avoided by a mitigation scenario under which global-mean near surface air temperature stabilises close to the Copenhagen Accord limit of a 2°C increase. Under BAU (a variant of the A1B scenario) the model-averaged projected SLR for 2090–2099 relative to 1980–1999 is 0.29 m–0.51 m (5%–95% uncertainties from treatment of land-based ice melt); under mitigation (E1 scenario) it is 0.17 m–0.34 m. This reduction is primarily from reduced thermal expansion. The spatial patterns of regional SLR are fairly dissimilar between the models, but are qualitatively similar across scenarios for a particular model. An impacts model suggests that by the end of the 21st century and without upgrade in defences around 55% of the 84 million additional people flooded per year globally under BAU (from SLR alone) could be avoided under such mitigation. The above projections of SLR follow the methodology of the IPCC Fourth Assessment. We have, however, also conducted a sensitivity study of SLR and its impacts where the possibility of accelerated ice sheet dynamics is accounted for
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pardaens, A.K.
Lowe, J.A
Brown, S.
Nicholls, R.J.
de Gusmão, D.
spellingShingle Pardaens, A.K.
Lowe, J.A
Brown, S.
Nicholls, R.J.
de Gusmão, D.
Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions
author_facet Pardaens, A.K.
Lowe, J.A
Brown, S.
Nicholls, R.J.
de Gusmão, D.
author_sort Pardaens, A.K.
title Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions
title_short Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions
title_full Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions
title_fullStr Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions
title_full_unstemmed Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions
title_sort sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions
publishDate 2011
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/1/2011GL047678.pdf
genre Ice Sheet
genre_facet Ice Sheet
op_relation https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/197915/1/2011GL047678.pdf
Pardaens, A.K., Lowe, J.A, Brown, S., Nicholls, R.J. and de Gusmão, D. (2011) Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions. Geophysical Research Letters, 38 (12), L12604-[5]. (doi:10.1029/2011GL047678 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047678>).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047678
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 38
container_issue 12
container_start_page n/a
op_container_end_page n/a
_version_ 1772815485992173568