The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component

The control climates of two coupled climate models are intercompared. The first is the third climate configuration of the Met Office Unified Model (HadCM3), while the second, the Coupled Hadley–Isopycnic Model Experiment (CHIME), is identical to the first except for the replacement of its ocean comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Main Authors: Megann, A.P., New, A.L., Blaker, A.T., Sinha, B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/166795/
_version_ 1828681105212964864
author Megann, A.P.
New, A.L.
Blaker, A.T.
Sinha, B.
author_facet Megann, A.P.
New, A.L.
Blaker, A.T.
Sinha, B.
author_sort Megann, A.P.
collection University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton
container_issue 19
container_start_page 5126
container_title Journal of Climate
container_volume 23
description The control climates of two coupled climate models are intercompared. The first is the third climate configuration of the Met Office Unified Model (HadCM3), while the second, the Coupled Hadley–Isopycnic Model Experiment (CHIME), is identical to the first except for the replacement of its ocean component by the Hybrid-Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM). Both models possess realistic and similar ocean heat transports and overturning circulation. However, substantial differences in the vertical structure of the two ocean components are observed, some of which are directly attributed to their different vertical coordinate systems. In particular, the sea surface temperature (SST) in CHIME is biased warm almost everywhere, particularly in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre, in contrast to HadCM3, which is biased cold except in the Southern Ocean. Whereas the HadCM3 ocean warms from just below the surface down to 1000-m depth, a similar warming in CHIME is more pronounced but shallower and confined to the upper 400 m, with cooling below this. This is particularly apparent in the subtropical thermoclines, which become more diffuse in HadCM3, but sharper in CHIME. This is interpreted as resulting from a more rigorously controlled diapycnal mixing in the interior isopycnic ocean in CHIME. Lower interior mixing is also apparent in the better representation and maintenance of key water masses in CHIME, such as Subantarctic Mode Water, Antarctic Intermediate Water, and North Atlantic Deep Water. Finally, the North Pacific SST cold error in HadCM3 is absent in CHIME, and may be related to a difference in the separation position of the Kuroshio. Disadvantages of CHIME include a nonconservation of heat equivalent to 0.5 W m?2 globally, and a warming and salinification of the northwestern Atlantic.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
North Atlantic Deep Water
North Atlantic
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
North Atlantic Deep Water
North Atlantic
Southern Ocean
geographic Antarctic
Pacific
Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Antarctic
Pacific
Southern Ocean
id ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:166795
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftsouthampton
op_container_end_page 5150
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3394.1
op_relation Megann, A.P., New, A.L., Blaker, A.T. and Sinha, B. (2010) The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component. Journal of Climate, 23 (19), 5126-5150. (doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3394.1 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3394.1>).
publishDate 2010
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsouthampton:oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:166795 2025-04-06T14:38:28+00:00 The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component Megann, A.P. New, A.L. Blaker, A.T. Sinha, B. 2010-10 https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/166795/ unknown Megann, A.P., New, A.L., Blaker, A.T. and Sinha, B. (2010) The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component. Journal of Climate, 23 (19), 5126-5150. (doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3394.1 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3394.1>). Article PeerReviewed 2010 ftsouthampton https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3394.1 2025-03-11T10:12:33Z The control climates of two coupled climate models are intercompared. The first is the third climate configuration of the Met Office Unified Model (HadCM3), while the second, the Coupled Hadley–Isopycnic Model Experiment (CHIME), is identical to the first except for the replacement of its ocean component by the Hybrid-Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM). Both models possess realistic and similar ocean heat transports and overturning circulation. However, substantial differences in the vertical structure of the two ocean components are observed, some of which are directly attributed to their different vertical coordinate systems. In particular, the sea surface temperature (SST) in CHIME is biased warm almost everywhere, particularly in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre, in contrast to HadCM3, which is biased cold except in the Southern Ocean. Whereas the HadCM3 ocean warms from just below the surface down to 1000-m depth, a similar warming in CHIME is more pronounced but shallower and confined to the upper 400 m, with cooling below this. This is particularly apparent in the subtropical thermoclines, which become more diffuse in HadCM3, but sharper in CHIME. This is interpreted as resulting from a more rigorously controlled diapycnal mixing in the interior isopycnic ocean in CHIME. Lower interior mixing is also apparent in the better representation and maintenance of key water masses in CHIME, such as Subantarctic Mode Water, Antarctic Intermediate Water, and North Atlantic Deep Water. Finally, the North Pacific SST cold error in HadCM3 is absent in CHIME, and may be related to a difference in the separation position of the Kuroshio. Disadvantages of CHIME include a nonconservation of heat equivalent to 0.5 W m?2 globally, and a warming and salinification of the northwestern Atlantic. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic North Atlantic Deep Water North Atlantic Southern Ocean University of Southampton: e-Prints Soton Antarctic Pacific Southern Ocean Journal of Climate 23 19 5126 5150
spellingShingle Megann, A.P.
New, A.L.
Blaker, A.T.
Sinha, B.
The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component
title The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component
title_full The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component
title_fullStr The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component
title_full_unstemmed The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component
title_short The sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component
title_sort sensitivity of a coupled climate model to its ocean component
url https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/166795/