Risks of Introductions of Marine Fishes: Reply to Briggs

• Published in: Fisheries
• Main Authors: Courtenay, Walter R., Jr., Collette, Bruce B., Essington, Timothy E., Hilborn, Ray, Orr, James W., Pauly, Daniel, Randall, John E., Smith-Vaniz, William F.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2009
• Subjects: Briggs; Pacific; North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10088/8079; https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446-34.4.181

This is a rebuttal to a publication by John C. Briggs in the April 2008 issue of Fisheries in Which be suggested introducing fishes and invertebrates from the North Pacific into the North Atlantic to increase diversity toward improving fisheries ill the latter. We argue otherwise for reasons that Briggs downplayed or never considered. Using examples of introductions within the Pacific bind the Atlantic, and movements of species from the Pacific to the Atlantic, we provide a record of failures and damage or dangers to native species from the few introductions that became successful. We argue that a lack of diversity of fishes and invertebrates in the North Atlantic versus that of the North Pacific is not the problem to be corrected by introductions is Briggs suggested. A record of overfishing and management policies is the problem in the North Atlantic. Introductions from the North Pacific to the North Atlantic are not worth the costs or the environmental risks involved NMNH NH-Vertebrate Zoology