PRISMA flow diagram.

• Main Authors: Jeff C. Clements (9161831), Josefin Sundin (2811598), Timothy D. Clark (8026217), Fredrik Jutfelt (418131)
• Format: Still Image
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2022
• Subjects: Evolutionary Biology; Ecology; Inorganic Chemistry; Science Policy; Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified; Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified; nonlarval life stages; low sample sizes; including increasing proportions; excess atmospheric co; broad ecological ramifications; affect marine life; provide quantitative evidence; decreasing effect sizes; recent studies documenting; negligible direct impact; fish behavior may; div >< p; large effect sizes; experimental ocean acidification; extreme &# 8220; fish behavior; &# 8220; scientific evidence; ocean acidification; large effects; impact journals; direct effects; decline effect; water species; vast majority; typically referred; systematic review; subsequent studies; studies examining; possible consequences; initial studies; improved approaches; disproportionate influence; associated behaviors; Prisma; Ocean acidification
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g006

Values represent the numbers of records found and retained at each stage of the literature search. Papers were considered “relevant” if they included an empirical test of ocean acidification on the behavior of a marine fish. Off-topic papers and topical review papers were excluded, as were topical papers on freshwater species and invertebrates. Relevant studies were deemed “ineligible” if they did not contain data from which effect sizes could be calculated (this included data that did not have an associated sample size or variance or relevant papers that did not report the behavioral data). Details of relevance and exclusion can be found in S4 Data . PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.