The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects.
Mean effect size magnitude (absolute lnRR ± upper and lower confidence bounds) as a function of time for datasets that only included experiments with (a) warm-water species, (b) olfactory-associated behaviors, and (c) larval life stages. Mean effect size magnitudes and confidence bounds were estimat...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Still Image |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g002 |
| id |
ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/19116411 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openpolar |
| spelling |
ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/19116411 2023-05-15T17:50:17+02:00 The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. Jeff C. Clements (9161831) Josefin Sundin (2811598) Timothy D. Clark (8026217) Fredrik Jutfelt (418131) 2022-02-03T18:26:23Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g002 unknown https://figshare.com/articles/figure/The_decline_effect_cannot_be_explained_by_3_commonly_considered_biological_drivers_of_acidification_effects_/19116411 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g002 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Evolutionary Biology Ecology Inorganic Chemistry Science Policy Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified nonlarval life stages low sample sizes including increasing proportions excess atmospheric co broad ecological ramifications affect marine life provide quantitative evidence decreasing effect sizes recent studies documenting negligible direct impact fish behavior may div >< p large effect sizes experimental ocean acidification extreme &# 8220 fish behavior &# 8220 scientific evidence ocean acidification large effects impact journals direct effects decline effect water species vast majority typically referred systematic review subsequent studies studies examining possible consequences initial studies improved approaches disproportionate influence associated behaviors Image Figure 2022 ftsmithonian https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g002 2022-02-07T16:47:06Z Mean effect size magnitude (absolute lnRR ± upper and lower confidence bounds) as a function of time for datasets that only included experiments with (a) warm-water species, (b) olfactory-associated behaviors, and (c) larval life stages. Mean effect size magnitudes and confidence bounds were estimated using Bayesian simulations and a folded normal distribution. Note: Colors are aesthetic in nature and follow a gradient according to year of publication online. Source data for each figure panel can be found in S1 Data . Still Image Ocean acidification Unknown |
| institution |
Open Polar |
| collection |
Unknown |
| op_collection_id |
ftsmithonian |
| language |
unknown |
| topic |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Inorganic Chemistry Science Policy Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified nonlarval life stages low sample sizes including increasing proportions excess atmospheric co broad ecological ramifications affect marine life provide quantitative evidence decreasing effect sizes recent studies documenting negligible direct impact fish behavior may div >< p large effect sizes experimental ocean acidification extreme &# 8220 fish behavior &# 8220 scientific evidence ocean acidification large effects impact journals direct effects decline effect water species vast majority typically referred systematic review subsequent studies studies examining possible consequences initial studies improved approaches disproportionate influence associated behaviors |
| spellingShingle |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Inorganic Chemistry Science Policy Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified nonlarval life stages low sample sizes including increasing proportions excess atmospheric co broad ecological ramifications affect marine life provide quantitative evidence decreasing effect sizes recent studies documenting negligible direct impact fish behavior may div >< p large effect sizes experimental ocean acidification extreme &# 8220 fish behavior &# 8220 scientific evidence ocean acidification large effects impact journals direct effects decline effect water species vast majority typically referred systematic review subsequent studies studies examining possible consequences initial studies improved approaches disproportionate influence associated behaviors Jeff C. Clements (9161831) Josefin Sundin (2811598) Timothy D. Clark (8026217) Fredrik Jutfelt (418131) The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. |
| topic_facet |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Inorganic Chemistry Science Policy Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified nonlarval life stages low sample sizes including increasing proportions excess atmospheric co broad ecological ramifications affect marine life provide quantitative evidence decreasing effect sizes recent studies documenting negligible direct impact fish behavior may div >< p large effect sizes experimental ocean acidification extreme &# 8220 fish behavior &# 8220 scientific evidence ocean acidification large effects impact journals direct effects decline effect water species vast majority typically referred systematic review subsequent studies studies examining possible consequences initial studies improved approaches disproportionate influence associated behaviors |
| description |
Mean effect size magnitude (absolute lnRR ± upper and lower confidence bounds) as a function of time for datasets that only included experiments with (a) warm-water species, (b) olfactory-associated behaviors, and (c) larval life stages. Mean effect size magnitudes and confidence bounds were estimated using Bayesian simulations and a folded normal distribution. Note: Colors are aesthetic in nature and follow a gradient according to year of publication online. Source data for each figure panel can be found in S1 Data . |
| format |
Still Image |
| author |
Jeff C. Clements (9161831) Josefin Sundin (2811598) Timothy D. Clark (8026217) Fredrik Jutfelt (418131) |
| author_facet |
Jeff C. Clements (9161831) Josefin Sundin (2811598) Timothy D. Clark (8026217) Fredrik Jutfelt (418131) |
| author_sort |
Jeff C. Clements (9161831) |
| title |
The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. |
| title_short |
The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. |
| title_full |
The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. |
| title_fullStr |
The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. |
| title_sort |
decline effect cannot be explained by 3 commonly considered biological drivers of acidification effects. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g002 |
| genre |
Ocean acidification |
| genre_facet |
Ocean acidification |
| op_relation |
https://figshare.com/articles/figure/The_decline_effect_cannot_be_explained_by_3_commonly_considered_biological_drivers_of_acidification_effects_/19116411 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g002 |
| op_rights |
CC BY 4.0 |
| op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
| op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001511.g002 |
| _version_ |
1766156976579936256 |