Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.

Prior to the test half, subjects were tested in a baseline condition where, with one exception, both subject and partner were rewarded for approaching the plate. In the Non-Social Control 2 (NSC2) condition, the baseline was run in the absence of a partner dog and thus food was simply placed on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katherine McAuliffe (491832)
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t001
id ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/16661734
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/16661734 2023-05-15T15:50:18+02:00 Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions. Katherine McAuliffe (491832) 2021-09-22T17:23:47Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t001 unknown https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Description_of_conditions_administered_in_the_test_half_of_sessions_/16661734 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t001 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon Dataset 2021 ftsmithonian https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t001 2021-12-20T01:43:38Z Prior to the test half, subjects were tested in a baseline condition where, with one exception, both subject and partner were rewarded for approaching the plate. In the Non-Social Control 2 (NSC2) condition, the baseline was run in the absence of a partner dog and thus food was simply placed on the partner’s plate. Food was always absent from subjects’ plates during tests. A single unit of reward (note that reward type varied between dogs and dingoes) was used in all cases. Dataset Canis lupus Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftsmithonian
language unknown
topic Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
unequal reward distributions
study helps address
past work suggests
inequitable resource distributions
div >< p
distribution across taxa
canis lupus </
canis familiaris </
many questions remain
canis dingo </
subjects ’ refusal
require specific training
new experimental context
investigating inequity aversion
domestic dogs (<
inequity aversion
domestic dogs
dingo (<
raise questions
new species
inequity condition
experimental features
either dogs
wolves (<
social referencing
providing data
nonhuman species
growing literature
findings add
domesticated canid
control conditions
comparative test
closely related
canid species
call upon
spellingShingle Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
unequal reward distributions
study helps address
past work suggests
inequitable resource distributions
div >< p
distribution across taxa
canis lupus </
canis familiaris </
many questions remain
canis dingo </
subjects ’ refusal
require specific training
new experimental context
investigating inequity aversion
domestic dogs (<
inequity aversion
domestic dogs
dingo (<
raise questions
new species
inequity condition
experimental features
either dogs
wolves (<
social referencing
providing data
nonhuman species
growing literature
findings add
domesticated canid
control conditions
comparative test
closely related
canid species
call upon
Katherine McAuliffe (491832)
Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.
topic_facet Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
unequal reward distributions
study helps address
past work suggests
inequitable resource distributions
div >< p
distribution across taxa
canis lupus </
canis familiaris </
many questions remain
canis dingo </
subjects ’ refusal
require specific training
new experimental context
investigating inequity aversion
domestic dogs (<
inequity aversion
domestic dogs
dingo (<
raise questions
new species
inequity condition
experimental features
either dogs
wolves (<
social referencing
providing data
nonhuman species
growing literature
findings add
domesticated canid
control conditions
comparative test
closely related
canid species
call upon
description Prior to the test half, subjects were tested in a baseline condition where, with one exception, both subject and partner were rewarded for approaching the plate. In the Non-Social Control 2 (NSC2) condition, the baseline was run in the absence of a partner dog and thus food was simply placed on the partner’s plate. Food was always absent from subjects’ plates during tests. A single unit of reward (note that reward type varied between dogs and dingoes) was used in all cases.
format Dataset
author Katherine McAuliffe (491832)
author_facet Katherine McAuliffe (491832)
author_sort Katherine McAuliffe (491832)
title Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.
title_short Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.
title_full Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.
title_fullStr Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.
title_full_unstemmed Description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.
title_sort description of conditions administered in the test half of sessions.
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t001
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_relation https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Description_of_conditions_administered_in_the_test_half_of_sessions_/16661734
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t001
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t001
_version_ 1766385268544241664