A New Generalized Empirical Correlation for Predicting Methane Hydrate Equilibrium Conditions in Pure Water

• Main Authors: Nithin B. Kummamuru (6743357), Patrice Perreault (5436176), Silvia Lenaerts (328992)
• Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: Mental Health; hydrate equilibrium conditions; New Generalized Empirical Correlation; 45 data points; equilibrium conditions; error analysis; Methane Hydrate Equilibrium Conditions; estimate CH 4 hydrate equilibrium c.; BHH; BTMH; correlation; Methane hydrate
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05833.s001

This work contributes to a new generalized empirical correlation for predicting methane (CH 4 ) hydrate equilibrium conditions in pure water. Unlike the conventional thermodynamic approach that involves complex reckoning, the proposed empirical equation is developed by regressing 215 experimental data points from the literature and validating with 45 data points for predicting methane hydrate equilibrium conditions in pure water. The new correlation is proposed for a temperature and pressure range of 273.2–303.48 K and 2.63–72.26 MPa, respectively. The accuracy and performance of the proposed correlation is quantitatively evaluated using statistical error analysis. The proposed correlation was able to estimate CH 4 hydrate equilibrium conditions satisfactorily with an R 2 of 0.99987. The overall error analysis for the proposed correlation shows fair agreement with the experimental data reported within the literature. Concurrently, the new correlation showed better performance in predicting equilibrium conditions compared to those calculated by other empirical correlations available in the literature within the investigated range. In addition, the proposed empirical equation is also checked to evaluate its efficacy in fitting each set of experimental binary/ternary methane hydrates (BTMH) and binary hydrogen hydrates (BHH) for an accurate representation of equilibrium data over a wide range of composition, pressure, and temperature conditions. A maximum percentage deviation of 0.58% and 0.24% was observed between experimental and calculated equilibrium conditions for BTMH and BHH, respectively.