Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula

Attached is the complete raw data from Vaughan and Dixson 2021 ‘Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula ’. Data collected from the behavioral lateralization trials has been inputted into the file ‘Vaughan_2020_Lateralization_Raw’. Colu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaughan, Matthew A (10028099), Dixson, Danielle L (10028102)
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Q-R
L R
M-N
H-I
F-H
F-G
I-J
ID
D-E
O-P
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4459414
id ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/13634601
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftsmithonian
language unknown
topic Medicine
Molecular Biology
Neuroscience
Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Inorganic Chemistry
Mental Health
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Computational Biology
Q-R
Column D
Column B
2 min recording period
L R
Columns K-L
APEX
Fluctuating Future Day
M-N
H-I
B display treatment group
Column E
F-H
Column C
Amphiprion percula Attached
F-G
CO 2
I-J
ID
ocean acidification
treatment group
program CO 2SYS
Chemosensory response data
target pH NBS
D-E
Mettler Toledo probe
Static Future Day
O-P
ldquo
spellingShingle Medicine
Molecular Biology
Neuroscience
Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Inorganic Chemistry
Mental Health
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Computational Biology
Q-R
Column D
Column B
2 min recording period
L R
Columns K-L
APEX
Fluctuating Future Day
M-N
H-I
B display treatment group
Column E
F-H
Column C
Amphiprion percula Attached
F-G
CO 2
I-J
ID
ocean acidification
treatment group
program CO 2SYS
Chemosensory response data
target pH NBS
D-E
Mettler Toledo probe
Static Future Day
O-P
ldquo
Vaughan, Matthew A (10028099)
Dixson, Danielle L (10028102)
Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula
topic_facet Medicine
Molecular Biology
Neuroscience
Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Inorganic Chemistry
Mental Health
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Computational Biology
Q-R
Column D
Column B
2 min recording period
L R
Columns K-L
APEX
Fluctuating Future Day
M-N
H-I
B display treatment group
Column E
F-H
Column C
Amphiprion percula Attached
F-G
CO 2
I-J
ID
ocean acidification
treatment group
program CO 2SYS
Chemosensory response data
target pH NBS
D-E
Mettler Toledo probe
Static Future Day
O-P
ldquo
description Attached is the complete raw data from Vaughan and Dixson 2021 ‘Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula ’. Data collected from the behavioral lateralization trials has been inputted into the file ‘Vaughan_2020_Lateralization_Raw’. Column A indicate the CO 2 treatment group, where “SPD” = Static Present Day, “SFD” = Static Future Day, “FPD” = Fluctuating Present Day, and “FFD” = Fluctuating Future Day. Each individual fish used from each treatment group (n=30) is displayed in Column B. Column C shows the binary results, in order, of each fish’s turns in the T-maze, and was scored as 0 (right turn) or 1 (left turn) for a total of 10 turns. The total number of turns to the right and left are provided in Column D-E. The relative lateralization ( L R ) of each fish was calculated {L R = [(Turn to the right – Turn to the left)/(Turn to the right + Turn to the left)] ∗ 100} in Column F. Absolute lateralization ( L A ) is provided in Column G. Chemosensory response data has been inputted into the file ‘Vaughan_2020_Chemosensory_Raw’. Column A and B display treatment group and fish ID (n=20) as outlined above. The cue used in trial of either Tang (nonpredator) or Cod (predator) is provided in Column C, and the control in Column D. Numbers in these are used solely for the purpose of data analysis. The side of the cue in the flume is provided in Column E, and corresponds with the cue labelled in Column C. Buckets containing either the cue or control were placed above the flume and color coded as “BS” (blue side) and “RS” (red side), as the person scoring the trials was blinded. This also helped account for the switch (from one side of the flume to the other) that occurs halfway through each trial. Columns F-G represent results from the first 2min recording period, and Columns H-I represent results from the second 2min recording period. The total tallies from each fish are provided in Column J; the totals from each side are calculated in Columns K-L, and then sorted by either cue or control in Columns M-N. Proportions and percentages in cue and control are calculated and provided in Columns O-P and Q-R, respectively. Carbonate chemistry data is compiled and provided in the ‘Vaughan_2020_Carbonate_Chemistry’. Measurements were taken each week (Column A) of each treatment group (as stated above, Column B). Column C reflects the time recordings were taken in the fluctuating treatments to hit the high, mid and low CO 2 points at “6:30”, “12:30” and “18:30”. Measurements of static treatment groups were taken at randomly selected times to get the reflection of the carbonate chemistry of these treatments, but for the purpose of clarity in this document they are listed as “Static”. Measurements were taken from a subset of tanks each that rotated each week (Column D). Our target pH NBS values (i.e. what was programmed into the APEX System) are listed in Column E. Columns F-H displayed pH NBS (taken with APEX probes), temperature °C (taken with a portable Mettler Toledo probe) and salinity (taken with a refractometer). Water samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically to provide pH T and dissolved inorganic carbon, with values provided in Columns I-J. Using the program CO2SYS, total alkalinity and p CO 2 were calculated, with values provided in Columns K-L.
format Dataset
author Vaughan, Matthew A (10028099)
Dixson, Danielle L (10028102)
author_facet Vaughan, Matthew A (10028099)
Dixson, Danielle L (10028102)
author_sort Vaughan, Matthew A (10028099)
title Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula
title_short Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula
title_full Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula
title_sort assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of amphiprion percula
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4459414
long_lat ENVELOPE(-67.317,-67.317,-73.700,-73.700)
geographic Toledo
geographic_facet Toledo
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assessing_the_impact_of_static_and_fluctuating_ocean_acidification_on_the_behavior_of_Amphiprion_percula/13634601
doi:10.5281/zenodo.4459414
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4459414
_version_ 1766158465614479360
spelling ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/13634601 2023-05-15T17:51:21+02:00 Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula Vaughan, Matthew A (10028099) Dixson, Danielle L (10028102) 2021-01-23T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4459414 unknown https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assessing_the_impact_of_static_and_fluctuating_ocean_acidification_on_the_behavior_of_Amphiprion_percula/13634601 doi:10.5281/zenodo.4459414 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Medicine Molecular Biology Neuroscience Evolutionary Biology Ecology Inorganic Chemistry Mental Health Infectious Diseases Virology Computational Biology Q-R Column D Column B 2 min recording period L R Columns K-L APEX Fluctuating Future Day M-N H-I B display treatment group Column E F-H Column C Amphiprion percula Attached F-G CO 2 I-J ID ocean acidification treatment group program CO 2SYS Chemosensory response data target pH NBS D-E Mettler Toledo probe Static Future Day O-P ldquo Dataset 2021 ftsmithonian https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4459414 2021-02-03T09:08:55Z Attached is the complete raw data from Vaughan and Dixson 2021 ‘Assessing the impact of static and fluctuating ocean acidification on the behavior of Amphiprion percula ’. Data collected from the behavioral lateralization trials has been inputted into the file ‘Vaughan_2020_Lateralization_Raw’. Column A indicate the CO 2 treatment group, where “SPD” = Static Present Day, “SFD” = Static Future Day, “FPD” = Fluctuating Present Day, and “FFD” = Fluctuating Future Day. Each individual fish used from each treatment group (n=30) is displayed in Column B. Column C shows the binary results, in order, of each fish’s turns in the T-maze, and was scored as 0 (right turn) or 1 (left turn) for a total of 10 turns. The total number of turns to the right and left are provided in Column D-E. The relative lateralization ( L R ) of each fish was calculated {L R = [(Turn to the right – Turn to the left)/(Turn to the right + Turn to the left)] ∗ 100} in Column F. Absolute lateralization ( L A ) is provided in Column G. Chemosensory response data has been inputted into the file ‘Vaughan_2020_Chemosensory_Raw’. Column A and B display treatment group and fish ID (n=20) as outlined above. The cue used in trial of either Tang (nonpredator) or Cod (predator) is provided in Column C, and the control in Column D. Numbers in these are used solely for the purpose of data analysis. The side of the cue in the flume is provided in Column E, and corresponds with the cue labelled in Column C. Buckets containing either the cue or control were placed above the flume and color coded as “BS” (blue side) and “RS” (red side), as the person scoring the trials was blinded. This also helped account for the switch (from one side of the flume to the other) that occurs halfway through each trial. Columns F-G represent results from the first 2min recording period, and Columns H-I represent results from the second 2min recording period. The total tallies from each fish are provided in Column J; the totals from each side are calculated in Columns K-L, and then sorted by either cue or control in Columns M-N. Proportions and percentages in cue and control are calculated and provided in Columns O-P and Q-R, respectively. Carbonate chemistry data is compiled and provided in the ‘Vaughan_2020_Carbonate_Chemistry’. Measurements were taken each week (Column A) of each treatment group (as stated above, Column B). Column C reflects the time recordings were taken in the fluctuating treatments to hit the high, mid and low CO 2 points at “6:30”, “12:30” and “18:30”. Measurements of static treatment groups were taken at randomly selected times to get the reflection of the carbonate chemistry of these treatments, but for the purpose of clarity in this document they are listed as “Static”. Measurements were taken from a subset of tanks each that rotated each week (Column D). Our target pH NBS values (i.e. what was programmed into the APEX System) are listed in Column E. Columns F-H displayed pH NBS (taken with APEX probes), temperature °C (taken with a portable Mettler Toledo probe) and salinity (taken with a refractometer). Water samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically to provide pH T and dissolved inorganic carbon, with values provided in Columns I-J. Using the program CO2SYS, total alkalinity and p CO 2 were calculated, with values provided in Columns K-L. Dataset Ocean acidification Unknown Toledo ENVELOPE(-67.317,-67.317,-73.700,-73.700)