Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices

ABSTRACT Moose (Alces alces) foraging on young Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) might reduce economical profit in forestry due to deteriorated log quality and biomass loss. Different indices are used to quantitatively estimate browsing effect on this tree species. I wanted to compare the relationship b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lindqvist, Sara
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: SLU/Dept. of Ecology 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/5103/
_version_ 1829301309438689280
author Lindqvist, Sara
author_facet Lindqvist, Sara
author_sort Lindqvist, Sara
collection Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
description ABSTRACT Moose (Alces alces) foraging on young Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) might reduce economical profit in forestry due to deteriorated log quality and biomass loss. Different indices are used to quantitatively estimate browsing effect on this tree species. I wanted to compare the relationship between two commonly applied survey methods for assessing browsing: the Moose Damage and the Browsing Pressure surveys. Furthermore a variety of factors influencing browsing intensity have been identified, yet moose selectivity for apical or lateral shoots of Scots pine has never been tested. Data on damage and browsing pressure was collected in young Scots pine stands (n=60 stands) within the southern boreal zone in Sweden. Logistic models were fitted to test the relationship between the indices and other factors possibly influencing the relation: pine density and mean stand height. Moose browsed the same relative proportions of apical and lateral shoots in relation to availability and there was no significant difference in selectivity towards either of the shoot categories, suggesting that moose forage shoots proportionally to what is available. The relationship between the two browsing indices was significant but the fit was not statistically perfect. Damage and browsing pressure most often coincided but browsing pressure did not always equate to stem damage. The Moose Damage survey could be used in favor of Browsing Pressure survey although both pine density and mean stand height also significantly affected the relationship between the methods. Hence using stem damage to predict browsing pressure (and vice versa) should be done with caution.
format Other/Unknown Material
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
id ftsluppsalast:oai:stud.epsilon.slu.se:5103
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftsluppsalast
op_relation https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/5103/
publishDate 2012
publisher SLU/Dept. of Ecology
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsluppsalast:oai:stud.epsilon.slu.se:5103 2025-04-13T14:06:24+00:00 Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices Lindqvist, Sara 2012 https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/5103/ eng eng SLU/Dept. of Ecology https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/5103/ Alces alces selectivity Scots pine browsing pressure stem damage H2 2012 ftsluppsalast 2025-03-17T04:37:43Z ABSTRACT Moose (Alces alces) foraging on young Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) might reduce economical profit in forestry due to deteriorated log quality and biomass loss. Different indices are used to quantitatively estimate browsing effect on this tree species. I wanted to compare the relationship between two commonly applied survey methods for assessing browsing: the Moose Damage and the Browsing Pressure surveys. Furthermore a variety of factors influencing browsing intensity have been identified, yet moose selectivity for apical or lateral shoots of Scots pine has never been tested. Data on damage and browsing pressure was collected in young Scots pine stands (n=60 stands) within the southern boreal zone in Sweden. Logistic models were fitted to test the relationship between the indices and other factors possibly influencing the relation: pine density and mean stand height. Moose browsed the same relative proportions of apical and lateral shoots in relation to availability and there was no significant difference in selectivity towards either of the shoot categories, suggesting that moose forage shoots proportionally to what is available. The relationship between the two browsing indices was significant but the fit was not statistically perfect. Damage and browsing pressure most often coincided but browsing pressure did not always equate to stem damage. The Moose Damage survey could be used in favor of Browsing Pressure survey although both pine density and mean stand height also significantly affected the relationship between the methods. Hence using stem damage to predict browsing pressure (and vice versa) should be done with caution. Other/Unknown Material Alces alces Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
spellingShingle Alces alces
selectivity
Scots pine
browsing pressure
stem damage
Lindqvist, Sara
Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices
title Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices
title_full Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices
title_fullStr Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices
title_full_unstemmed Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices
title_short Moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices
title_sort moose foraging patterns : implications for the use of browsing indices
topic Alces alces
selectivity
Scots pine
browsing pressure
stem damage
topic_facet Alces alces
selectivity
Scots pine
browsing pressure
stem damage
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/5103/