“We had nothing left to lose”

As conflicts between reindeer herding communities and exploitative industries such as forestry continue in Sweden, new collaborations between these reindeer herding communities and the environmental movement arise. Such collaborations have the aim to provide their members with an advantage; a synerg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lohaus, Annalena
Format: Text
Language:Swedish
English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17891/1/lohaus-a-20220623.pdf
id ftsluppsalast:oai:stud.epsilon.slu.se:17891
record_format openpolar
spelling ftsluppsalast:oai:stud.epsilon.slu.se:17891 2023-05-15T17:44:57+02:00 “We had nothing left to lose” Lohaus, Annalena 2022-06-23 application/pdf https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17891/1/lohaus-a-20220623.pdf sv eng swe eng https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17891/ urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-500384 https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17891/1/lohaus-a-20220623.pdf Nature conservation and land resources Second cycle, A2E NonPeerReviewed 2022 ftsluppsalast 2022-09-10T18:13:17Z As conflicts between reindeer herding communities and exploitative industries such as forestry continue in Sweden, new collaborations between these reindeer herding communities and the environmental movement arise. Such collaborations have the aim to provide their members with an advantage; a synergy that is achieved by working together. However, studies of such collaborations also show that they often are sources of frustrations instead, due to differences in e.g., purposes and resources. Previous research on collaborations between Indigenous communities and environmental organisations in other parts of the world have shown that these collaborations often bridge the aim to achieve self-determination with the aim of nature protection. While these collaborations can be a source of strength, they also struggle with addressing e.g., power imbalances. Yet, research on these kind of collaborations in a Swedish context is limited. This thesis addresses that knowledge gap by providing insight into the dynamics of such collaborations, using the example of the collaboration between Muonio reindeer herding community in northern Sweden and Greenpeace Sweden. The analysis revealed three main themes how the collaboration is perceived: The collaboration as a stepping stone, the collaboration as a place of empowerment and the collaboration as a place of asymmetry. It is shown that agreed common aims on both the outcome and the process of the collaboration are essential to building trust and guiding the collaboration forward. Being two organisations with different purposes and fields of expertise makes collaborative advantage possible in the first place, as the partners complement each other. Paradoxically, these very differences also cause challenges that need to be overcome through continuous commitment and willingness to adapt. This study then not only adds to understanding the dynamics of the collaboration at hand, but furthermore offers insights into how members can actively create conditions to make collaborations between ... Text Northern Sweden Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Epsilon Archive for Student Projects Muonio ENVELOPE(23.833,23.833,67.833,67.833)
institution Open Polar
collection Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Epsilon Archive for Student Projects
op_collection_id ftsluppsalast
language Swedish
English
topic Nature conservation and land resources
spellingShingle Nature conservation and land resources
Lohaus, Annalena
“We had nothing left to lose”
topic_facet Nature conservation and land resources
description As conflicts between reindeer herding communities and exploitative industries such as forestry continue in Sweden, new collaborations between these reindeer herding communities and the environmental movement arise. Such collaborations have the aim to provide their members with an advantage; a synergy that is achieved by working together. However, studies of such collaborations also show that they often are sources of frustrations instead, due to differences in e.g., purposes and resources. Previous research on collaborations between Indigenous communities and environmental organisations in other parts of the world have shown that these collaborations often bridge the aim to achieve self-determination with the aim of nature protection. While these collaborations can be a source of strength, they also struggle with addressing e.g., power imbalances. Yet, research on these kind of collaborations in a Swedish context is limited. This thesis addresses that knowledge gap by providing insight into the dynamics of such collaborations, using the example of the collaboration between Muonio reindeer herding community in northern Sweden and Greenpeace Sweden. The analysis revealed three main themes how the collaboration is perceived: The collaboration as a stepping stone, the collaboration as a place of empowerment and the collaboration as a place of asymmetry. It is shown that agreed common aims on both the outcome and the process of the collaboration are essential to building trust and guiding the collaboration forward. Being two organisations with different purposes and fields of expertise makes collaborative advantage possible in the first place, as the partners complement each other. Paradoxically, these very differences also cause challenges that need to be overcome through continuous commitment and willingness to adapt. This study then not only adds to understanding the dynamics of the collaboration at hand, but furthermore offers insights into how members can actively create conditions to make collaborations between ...
format Text
author Lohaus, Annalena
author_facet Lohaus, Annalena
author_sort Lohaus, Annalena
title “We had nothing left to lose”
title_short “We had nothing left to lose”
title_full “We had nothing left to lose”
title_fullStr “We had nothing left to lose”
title_full_unstemmed “We had nothing left to lose”
title_sort “we had nothing left to lose”
publishDate 2022
url https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17891/1/lohaus-a-20220623.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(23.833,23.833,67.833,67.833)
geographic Muonio
geographic_facet Muonio
genre Northern Sweden
genre_facet Northern Sweden
op_relation https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17891/
urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-s-500384
https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/17891/1/lohaus-a-20220623.pdf
_version_ 1766147252837941248