A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage

To supplement catch and effort regulations with the purpose to rebuild the cod (Gadus morhua) stock in Kattegat, Sweden and Denmark established a large (426 km(2)) year-round no-take zone (NTZ) surrounded by partially protected areas (PPAs) in 2009. The purpose of these spatial regulations was to pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sköld, Mattias, Börjesson, Patrik, Wennhage, Håkan, Hjelm, Joakim, Lövgren, Johan, Ringdahl, Katja
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/
https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/1/skold-m-et-al-20221017.pdf
id ftslunivuppsala:oai:pub.epsilon.slu.se:29262
record_format openpolar
spelling ftslunivuppsala:oai:pub.epsilon.slu.se:29262 2023-05-15T16:19:22+02:00 A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage Sköld, Mattias Börjesson, Patrik Wennhage, Håkan Hjelm, Joakim Lövgren, Johan Ringdahl, Katja 2022 application/pdf https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/ https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/1/skold-m-et-al-20221017.pdf en eng eng https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/1/skold-m-et-al-20221017.pdf Sköld, Mattias and Börjesson, Patrik and Wennhage, Håkan and Hjelm, Joakim and Lövgren, Johan and Ringdahl, Katja (2022). A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage. ICES Journal of Marine Science [Research article] Fish and Aquacultural Science Fish and Wildlife Management Research article NonPeerReviewed info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2022 ftslunivuppsala 2022-10-20T16:13:51Z To supplement catch and effort regulations with the purpose to rebuild the cod (Gadus morhua) stock in Kattegat, Sweden and Denmark established a large (426 km(2)) year-round no-take zone (NTZ) surrounded by partially protected areas (PPAs) in 2009. The purpose of these spatial regulations was to prohibit cod fishing on the spawning grounds and to displace fisheries bycatch of cod from areas where mature cod aggregate in the Kattegat. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the established NTZ and PPAs on the local fish assemblage, including cod. Based on a spatially high-resolution bottom trawl survey in the Kattegat (covering 2008-2021), multivariate analyses revealed significant shifts in the fish assemblage. A closer analysis indicated that six to seven fish species, including cod increased in the NTZ relative to control areas depending on if abundance or biomass was used as dependent variable. Univariate analysis showed that two flatfish species dab (Limanda limanda) and lemon sole (Microstomus kitt), and Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) significantly increased in biomass in the NTZ, and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in the PPA relative to the control areas. These results suggest that the NTZ protected even relatively mobile species in an open sea system, such as the Kattegat. However, neither cod abundance nor biomass showed a significant increase as an effect of the NTZ and PPA despite two relatively strong year classes in 2012 and 2013, which possibly would have helped the recovery of the cod stock. As assessed by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea in 2022, Kattegat cod continuously suffer from being severely overfished with low recruitment, and high discard rates in the mixed N. norvegicus fishery, is considered the major driver behind the reinforced depletion of the stock. Article in Journal/Newspaper Gadus morhua Scophthalmus maximus Turbot Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU): Epsilon Open Archive Kattegat ENVELOPE(9.692,9.692,63.563,63.563) Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU): Epsilon Open Archive
op_collection_id ftslunivuppsala
language English
topic Fish and Aquacultural Science
Fish and Wildlife Management
spellingShingle Fish and Aquacultural Science
Fish and Wildlife Management
Sköld, Mattias
Börjesson, Patrik
Wennhage, Håkan
Hjelm, Joakim
Lövgren, Johan
Ringdahl, Katja
A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage
topic_facet Fish and Aquacultural Science
Fish and Wildlife Management
description To supplement catch and effort regulations with the purpose to rebuild the cod (Gadus morhua) stock in Kattegat, Sweden and Denmark established a large (426 km(2)) year-round no-take zone (NTZ) surrounded by partially protected areas (PPAs) in 2009. The purpose of these spatial regulations was to prohibit cod fishing on the spawning grounds and to displace fisheries bycatch of cod from areas where mature cod aggregate in the Kattegat. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the established NTZ and PPAs on the local fish assemblage, including cod. Based on a spatially high-resolution bottom trawl survey in the Kattegat (covering 2008-2021), multivariate analyses revealed significant shifts in the fish assemblage. A closer analysis indicated that six to seven fish species, including cod increased in the NTZ relative to control areas depending on if abundance or biomass was used as dependent variable. Univariate analysis showed that two flatfish species dab (Limanda limanda) and lemon sole (Microstomus kitt), and Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) significantly increased in biomass in the NTZ, and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in the PPA relative to the control areas. These results suggest that the NTZ protected even relatively mobile species in an open sea system, such as the Kattegat. However, neither cod abundance nor biomass showed a significant increase as an effect of the NTZ and PPA despite two relatively strong year classes in 2012 and 2013, which possibly would have helped the recovery of the cod stock. As assessed by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea in 2022, Kattegat cod continuously suffer from being severely overfished with low recruitment, and high discard rates in the mixed N. norvegicus fishery, is considered the major driver behind the reinforced depletion of the stock.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sköld, Mattias
Börjesson, Patrik
Wennhage, Håkan
Hjelm, Joakim
Lövgren, Johan
Ringdahl, Katja
author_facet Sköld, Mattias
Börjesson, Patrik
Wennhage, Håkan
Hjelm, Joakim
Lövgren, Johan
Ringdahl, Katja
author_sort Sköld, Mattias
title A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage
title_short A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage
title_full A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage
title_fullStr A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage
title_full_unstemmed A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage
title_sort no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage
publishDate 2022
url https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/
https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/1/skold-m-et-al-20221017.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(9.692,9.692,63.563,63.563)
geographic Kattegat
Norway
geographic_facet Kattegat
Norway
genre Gadus morhua
Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
genre_facet Gadus morhua
Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
op_relation https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/29262/1/skold-m-et-al-20221017.pdf
Sköld, Mattias and Börjesson, Patrik and Wennhage, Håkan and Hjelm, Joakim and Lövgren, Johan and Ringdahl, Katja (2022). A no-take zone and partially protected areas are not enough to save the Kattegat cod, but enhance biomass and abundance of the local fish assemblage. ICES Journal of Marine Science [Research article]
_version_ 1766005758946705408