Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification

Determining the origin of individuals in mixed population samples is key in many ecological, conservation and management contexts. Genetic data can be analyzed using genetic stock identification (GSI), where the origin of single individuals is determined using Individual Assignment (IA) and populati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Östergren, Johan, Palm, Stefan, Gilbey, John, Dannewitz, Johan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/
https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/1/ostergen_j_et_al_200406.pdf
_version_ 1830586467845406720
author Östergren, Johan
Palm, Stefan
Gilbey, John
Dannewitz, Johan
author_facet Östergren, Johan
Palm, Stefan
Gilbey, John
Dannewitz, Johan
author_sort Östergren, Johan
collection Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU): Epsilon Open Archive
description Determining the origin of individuals in mixed population samples is key in many ecological, conservation and management contexts. Genetic data can be analyzed using genetic stock identification (GSI), where the origin of single individuals is determined using Individual Assignment (IA) and population proportions are estimated with Mixed Stock Analysis (MSA). In such analyses, allele frequencies in a reference baseline are required. Unknown individuals or mixture proportions are assigned to source populations based on the likelihood that their multilocus genotypes occur in a particular baseline sample. Representative sampling of populations included in a baseline is important when designing and performing GSI. Here, we investigate the effects of family sampling on GSI, using both simulated and empirical genotypes for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). We show that nonrepresentative sampling leading to inclusion of close relatives in a reference baseline may introduce bias in estimated proportions of contributing populations in a mixed sample, and increases the amount of incorrectly assigned individual fish. Simulated data further show that the induced bias increases with increasing family structure, but that it can be partly mitigated by increased baseline population sample sizes. Results from standard accuracy tests of GSI (using only a reference baseline and/or self-assignment) gave a false and elevated indication of the baseline power and accuracy to identify stock proportions and individuals. These findings suggest that family structure in baseline population samples should be quantified and its consequences evaluated, before carrying out GSI.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
id ftslunivuppsala:oai:pub.epsilon.slu.se:16839
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftslunivuppsala
op_relation https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/1/ostergen_j_et_al_200406.pdf
Östergren, Johan and Palm, Stefan and Gilbey, John and Dannewitz, Johan (2020). Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification. Molecular Ecology Resources. 20 , 498-510 [Research article]
op_rights cc_by_4
publishDate 2020
record_format openpolar
spelling ftslunivuppsala:oai:pub.epsilon.slu.se:16839 2025-04-27T14:26:16+00:00 Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification Östergren, Johan Palm, Stefan Gilbey, John Dannewitz, Johan 2020 application/pdf https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/ https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/1/ostergen_j_et_al_200406.pdf en eng eng https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/1/ostergen_j_et_al_200406.pdf Östergren, Johan and Palm, Stefan and Gilbey, John and Dannewitz, Johan (2020). Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification. Molecular Ecology Resources. 20 , 498-510 [Research article] cc_by_4 Ecology Fish and Aquacultural Science Genetics (medical genetics to be 30107 and agricultural genetics to be 40402) Research article NonPeerReviewed info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2020 ftslunivuppsala 2025-03-28T11:17:59Z Determining the origin of individuals in mixed population samples is key in many ecological, conservation and management contexts. Genetic data can be analyzed using genetic stock identification (GSI), where the origin of single individuals is determined using Individual Assignment (IA) and population proportions are estimated with Mixed Stock Analysis (MSA). In such analyses, allele frequencies in a reference baseline are required. Unknown individuals or mixture proportions are assigned to source populations based on the likelihood that their multilocus genotypes occur in a particular baseline sample. Representative sampling of populations included in a baseline is important when designing and performing GSI. Here, we investigate the effects of family sampling on GSI, using both simulated and empirical genotypes for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). We show that nonrepresentative sampling leading to inclusion of close relatives in a reference baseline may introduce bias in estimated proportions of contributing populations in a mixed sample, and increases the amount of incorrectly assigned individual fish. Simulated data further show that the induced bias increases with increasing family structure, but that it can be partly mitigated by increased baseline population sample sizes. Results from standard accuracy tests of GSI (using only a reference baseline and/or self-assignment) gave a false and elevated indication of the baseline power and accuracy to identify stock proportions and individuals. These findings suggest that family structure in baseline population samples should be quantified and its consequences evaluated, before carrying out GSI. Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU): Epsilon Open Archive
spellingShingle Ecology
Fish and Aquacultural Science
Genetics (medical genetics to be 30107 and agricultural genetics to be 40402)
Östergren, Johan
Palm, Stefan
Gilbey, John
Dannewitz, Johan
Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification
title Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification
title_full Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification
title_fullStr Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification
title_full_unstemmed Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification
title_short Close relatives in population samples: Evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification
title_sort close relatives in population samples: evaluation of the consequences for genetic stock identification
topic Ecology
Fish and Aquacultural Science
Genetics (medical genetics to be 30107 and agricultural genetics to be 40402)
topic_facet Ecology
Fish and Aquacultural Science
Genetics (medical genetics to be 30107 and agricultural genetics to be 40402)
url https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/
https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16839/1/ostergen_j_et_al_200406.pdf