»SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR
The article considers the relation between propositional knowledge and image; at the beginning, we review three theories which deal with this subject: Pylyshyn's, Paivio's and Kosslyn's. We accept Kosslyn's theory as most suitable for our purposes and reject the other two because...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611/3304 https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611 |
id |
ftslacadscienart:oai:ojs.zrc-sazu.si:article/3611 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftslacadscienart:oai:ojs.zrc-sazu.si:article/3611 2023-05-15T18:12:42+02:00 »SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR »ZDETI SE KOT« KOT METAFORA Kante, Božidar 2016-01-14 application/pdf https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611/3304 https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611 eng eng ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611 Filozofski vestnik; Vol. 9 No. 1 (1988): Vestnik Inštituta za marksistične študije ZRC SAZU Filozofski vestnik; Letn. 9 Št. 1 (1988): Vestnik Inštituta za marksistične študije ZRC SAZU 1581-1239 0353-4510 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2016 ftslacadscienart 2022-08-11T20:09:21Z The article considers the relation between propositional knowledge and image; at the beginning, we review three theories which deal with this subject: Pylyshyn's, Paivio's and Kosslyn's. We accept Kosslyn's theory as most suitable for our purposes and reject the other two because they are not true to the facts. Imagery is one of the essential parts of our mental life and it is not totally reducible to propositional knowledge. In the process of forming and understanding of metaphor, both imagery and propositional knowledge are present.Our concluding argument is that we cannot use the notion of »seeing as« in an account of metaphor because it is already metaphorical. For a correct account of metaphor, we need notions which are not themselves »laden« with metaphorical components. Članek obravnava odnos med propozicionalnim vedenjem in podobo. Na začetku podamo pregled treh teorij, ki se ukvarjajo s tem predmetom: Pylyshynovo, Paiviojevo in Kosslynovo. Kot najbolj sprejemljivo za naš namen sprejmemo Kossly-novo ter zavrnemo drugi dve, ker se ne ujemata z dejstvi. Prispodabljanje je eden od bistvenih delov našega duševnega življenja ter se ga ne da povsem reducirati na propozicionalno znanje. V procesu oblikovanja in razumevanja metafore sta navzoči tako propozicionalno znanje kot prispodabljanje. Naša sklepna ugotovitev je, da pojma »zdeti se kot« v primeru metafore ne moremo uporabljati, saj je že sam metaforičen. Za pravilno obravnavo metafore potrebujemo pojme, ki sami niso obremenjeni z metaforičnimi sestavinami. Article in Journal/Newspaper sami ZRC SAZU Publishing (Znanstvenoraziskovalni center - Slovenske akademije znanosti in umetnosti) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
ZRC SAZU Publishing (Znanstvenoraziskovalni center - Slovenske akademije znanosti in umetnosti) |
op_collection_id |
ftslacadscienart |
language |
English |
description |
The article considers the relation between propositional knowledge and image; at the beginning, we review three theories which deal with this subject: Pylyshyn's, Paivio's and Kosslyn's. We accept Kosslyn's theory as most suitable for our purposes and reject the other two because they are not true to the facts. Imagery is one of the essential parts of our mental life and it is not totally reducible to propositional knowledge. In the process of forming and understanding of metaphor, both imagery and propositional knowledge are present.Our concluding argument is that we cannot use the notion of »seeing as« in an account of metaphor because it is already metaphorical. For a correct account of metaphor, we need notions which are not themselves »laden« with metaphorical components. Članek obravnava odnos med propozicionalnim vedenjem in podobo. Na začetku podamo pregled treh teorij, ki se ukvarjajo s tem predmetom: Pylyshynovo, Paiviojevo in Kosslynovo. Kot najbolj sprejemljivo za naš namen sprejmemo Kossly-novo ter zavrnemo drugi dve, ker se ne ujemata z dejstvi. Prispodabljanje je eden od bistvenih delov našega duševnega življenja ter se ga ne da povsem reducirati na propozicionalno znanje. V procesu oblikovanja in razumevanja metafore sta navzoči tako propozicionalno znanje kot prispodabljanje. Naša sklepna ugotovitev je, da pojma »zdeti se kot« v primeru metafore ne moremo uporabljati, saj je že sam metaforičen. Za pravilno obravnavo metafore potrebujemo pojme, ki sami niso obremenjeni z metaforičnimi sestavinami. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Kante, Božidar |
spellingShingle |
Kante, Božidar »SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR |
author_facet |
Kante, Božidar |
author_sort |
Kante, Božidar |
title |
»SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR |
title_short |
»SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR |
title_full |
»SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR |
title_fullStr |
»SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR |
title_full_unstemmed |
»SEEING AS« AS METAPHOR |
title_sort |
»seeing as« as metaphor |
publisher |
ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611/3304 https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611 |
genre |
sami |
genre_facet |
sami |
op_source |
Filozofski vestnik; Vol. 9 No. 1 (1988): Vestnik Inštituta za marksistične študije ZRC SAZU Filozofski vestnik; Letn. 9 Št. 1 (1988): Vestnik Inštituta za marksistične študije ZRC SAZU 1581-1239 0353-4510 |
op_relation |
https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3611 |
_version_ |
1766185193263071232 |