“Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle”
This paper was inspired by a peculiar theme that emerged from qualitative interviews in Iceland, Norway and Sweden with leaders of Centres for Independent Living (CILs). CILs are peer-led organisations that maximise user-control of disability services. Paradoxically, the Nordic reputation as forerun...
Published in: | Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centre for Disability Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20388 https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-03 |
id |
ftskoevdehoeg:oai:DiVA.org:his-20388 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftskoevdehoeg:oai:DiVA.org:his-20388 2023-05-15T16:50:40+02:00 “Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle” Brennan, Ciara Traustadóttir, Rannveig Rice, James Anderberg, Peter 2018 application/pdf http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20388 https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-03 eng eng Centre for Disability Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland Department of Anthropology and Centre for Disability Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland Department of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden Nordisk välfärdsforskning %7C Nordic Welfare Research, 1799-4691, 2018, 3:1, s. 18-32 orcid:0000-0001-9870-8477 http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20388 doi:10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-03 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CRPD disability human rights independent living Nursing Omvårdnad Public Health Global Health Social Medicine and Epidemiology Folkhälsovetenskap global hälsa socialmedicin och epidemiologi Article in journal info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2018 ftskoevdehoeg https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-03 2022-10-25T20:52:34Z This paper was inspired by a peculiar theme that emerged from qualitative interviews in Iceland, Norway and Sweden with leaders of Centres for Independent Living (CILs). CILs are peer-led organisations that maximise user-control of disability services. Paradoxically, the Nordic reputation as forerunners in deinstitutionalisation and independent living was considered an impediment to implementing Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities which requires “access to a range of support services, including personal assistance necessary to support living and inclusion in the community”. This contradiction prompted the questions: How is Article 19 implemented in Nordic welfare services? And why is previous progress towards independent living and personal assistance seen as an impediment to implementing the rights-based approach required by the Convention? The findings suggest that it is difficult to change a developed welfare system in which there are vested interests in maintaining the status quo. The reputation of “being number one” conceals problems such as inflexible services and the imbalance of power where the control of services lies with the system and the professionals, not the users. CC BY-NC 4.0 Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland University of Skövde: Publications (DiVA) Norway Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research 3 1 18 32 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Skövde: Publications (DiVA) |
op_collection_id |
ftskoevdehoeg |
language |
English |
topic |
CRPD disability human rights independent living Nursing Omvårdnad Public Health Global Health Social Medicine and Epidemiology Folkhälsovetenskap global hälsa socialmedicin och epidemiologi |
spellingShingle |
CRPD disability human rights independent living Nursing Omvårdnad Public Health Global Health Social Medicine and Epidemiology Folkhälsovetenskap global hälsa socialmedicin och epidemiologi Brennan, Ciara Traustadóttir, Rannveig Rice, James Anderberg, Peter “Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle” |
topic_facet |
CRPD disability human rights independent living Nursing Omvårdnad Public Health Global Health Social Medicine and Epidemiology Folkhälsovetenskap global hälsa socialmedicin och epidemiologi |
description |
This paper was inspired by a peculiar theme that emerged from qualitative interviews in Iceland, Norway and Sweden with leaders of Centres for Independent Living (CILs). CILs are peer-led organisations that maximise user-control of disability services. Paradoxically, the Nordic reputation as forerunners in deinstitutionalisation and independent living was considered an impediment to implementing Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities which requires “access to a range of support services, including personal assistance necessary to support living and inclusion in the community”. This contradiction prompted the questions: How is Article 19 implemented in Nordic welfare services? And why is previous progress towards independent living and personal assistance seen as an impediment to implementing the rights-based approach required by the Convention? The findings suggest that it is difficult to change a developed welfare system in which there are vested interests in maintaining the status quo. The reputation of “being number one” conceals problems such as inflexible services and the imbalance of power where the control of services lies with the system and the professionals, not the users. CC BY-NC 4.0 |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Brennan, Ciara Traustadóttir, Rannveig Rice, James Anderberg, Peter |
author_facet |
Brennan, Ciara Traustadóttir, Rannveig Rice, James Anderberg, Peter |
author_sort |
Brennan, Ciara |
title |
“Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle” |
title_short |
“Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle” |
title_full |
“Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle” |
title_fullStr |
“Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle” |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Being Number One is the Biggest Obstacle” |
title_sort |
“being number one is the biggest obstacle” |
publisher |
Centre for Disability Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20388 https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-03 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
Nordisk välfärdsforskning %7C Nordic Welfare Research, 1799-4691, 2018, 3:1, s. 18-32 orcid:0000-0001-9870-8477 http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20388 doi:10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-03 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-03 |
container_title |
Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research |
container_volume |
3 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
18 |
op_container_end_page |
32 |
_version_ |
1766040786637422592 |